Multiparty Communication: A New Direction in Characterizing the Impact of Traumatic Brain Injury on Social Communication.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Sophia Kekes-Szabo, Sharice Clough, Sarah Brown-Schmidt, Melissa C Duff
{"title":"Multiparty Communication: A New Direction in Characterizing the Impact of Traumatic Brain Injury on Social Communication.","authors":"Sophia Kekes-Szabo, Sharice Clough, Sarah Brown-Schmidt, Melissa C Duff","doi":"10.1044/2025_AJSLP-24-00151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this viewpoint is to advocate for increased study of common ground and audience design processes in multiparty communication in traumatic brain injury (TBI).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Building on discussions at the 2024 International Cognitive-Communication Disorders Conference, we review common ground and audience design processes in dyadic and multiparty communication. We discuss how the diffuse profiles of neural and cognitive deficits place individuals with TBI at increased risk for keeping track of who knows what in group settings and using that knowledge to flexibly adapt their communication behaviors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We routinely engage in social communication in groups of three or more people at work, school, and social functions. While academic, vocational, and interpersonal domains are all areas where individuals with TBI are at risk for negative outcomes, we know very little about the impact of TBI on group, or multiparty, communication.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The empirical study of common ground and audience design in multiparty communication in TBI presents a promising new direction in characterizing the impact of TBI on social communication, uncovering the underlying mechanisms of cognitive-communication disorders, and may lead to new interventions aimed at improving success in navigating group communication at work and school, and in interpersonal relationships.</p>","PeriodicalId":49240,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1044/2025_AJSLP-24-00151","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this viewpoint is to advocate for increased study of common ground and audience design processes in multiparty communication in traumatic brain injury (TBI).

Method: Building on discussions at the 2024 International Cognitive-Communication Disorders Conference, we review common ground and audience design processes in dyadic and multiparty communication. We discuss how the diffuse profiles of neural and cognitive deficits place individuals with TBI at increased risk for keeping track of who knows what in group settings and using that knowledge to flexibly adapt their communication behaviors.

Results: We routinely engage in social communication in groups of three or more people at work, school, and social functions. While academic, vocational, and interpersonal domains are all areas where individuals with TBI are at risk for negative outcomes, we know very little about the impact of TBI on group, or multiparty, communication.

Conclusions: The empirical study of common ground and audience design in multiparty communication in TBI presents a promising new direction in characterizing the impact of TBI on social communication, uncovering the underlying mechanisms of cognitive-communication disorders, and may lead to new interventions aimed at improving success in navigating group communication at work and school, and in interpersonal relationships.

多方沟通:表征创伤性脑损伤对社会沟通影响的新方向。
目的:本观点的目的是提倡增加对创伤性脑损伤(TBI)中多方沟通的共同点和受众设计过程的研究。方法:以2024年国际认知沟通障碍会议的讨论为基础,回顾二元和多方沟通中的共同点和受众设计过程。我们讨论了神经和认知缺陷的漫漫性特征如何使TBI患者在跟踪群体环境中谁知道什么并利用这些知识灵活地调整他们的沟通行为方面面临更高的风险。结果:在工作、学校和社交场合,我们经常在三人或三人以上的群体中进行社交交流。虽然学术、职业和人际领域都是TBI患者面临负面结果风险的领域,但我们对TBI对群体或多方沟通的影响知之甚少。结论:对创伤性脑损伤中多方沟通的共同点和受众设计的实证研究为描述创伤性脑损伤对社会沟通的影响、揭示认知-沟通障碍的潜在机制提供了一个有希望的新方向,并可能为提高工作、学校和人际关系中群体沟通的成功提供新的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
11.50%
发文量
353
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Mission: AJSLP publishes peer-reviewed research and other scholarly articles on all aspects of clinical practice in speech-language pathology. The journal is an international outlet for clinical research pertaining to screening, detection, diagnosis, management, and outcomes of communication and swallowing disorders across the lifespan as well as the etiologies and characteristics of these disorders. Because of its clinical orientation, the journal disseminates research findings applicable to diverse aspects of clinical practice in speech-language pathology. AJSLP seeks to advance evidence-based practice by disseminating the results of new studies as well as providing a forum for critical reviews and meta-analyses of previously published work. Scope: The broad field of speech-language pathology, including aphasia; apraxia of speech and childhood apraxia of speech; aural rehabilitation; augmentative and alternative communication; cognitive impairment; craniofacial disorders; dysarthria; fluency disorders; language disorders in children; speech sound disorders; swallowing, dysphagia, and feeding disorders; and voice disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信