Local anesthesia is associated with better functional outcomes than conscious sedation in endovascular thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke: A retrospective analysis of the OPTIMISE registry.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
George Nunes Mendes, Alexandre Y Poppe, Steve Verreault, Alexander Khaw, Richard Swartz, Darren Ferguson, Aditya Bharatha, George Medvedev, David Volders, Grant Stotts, Aristeidis Katsanos, Grégory Jacquin
{"title":"Local anesthesia is associated with better functional outcomes than conscious sedation in endovascular thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke: A retrospective analysis of the OPTIMISE registry.","authors":"George Nunes Mendes, Alexandre Y Poppe, Steve Verreault, Alexander Khaw, Richard Swartz, Darren Ferguson, Aditya Bharatha, George Medvedev, David Volders, Grant Stotts, Aristeidis Katsanos, Grégory Jacquin","doi":"10.1177/15910199251349662","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionThere are several possible anesthetic strategies during endovascular therapy (EVT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS), including general anesthesia (GA), conscious sedation (CS), and local anesthesia (LA). While randomized trials have not shown a clear advantage of GA or CS, LA remains understudied. We aimed to determine if LA is associated with better functional outcomes compared to CS in a Canadian EVT registry.Patients and MethodsA retrospective analysis of the OPTIMISE registry was conducted, focusing on adult patients with anterior circulation AIS treated with EVT between January 2018 and December 2021. Patients with available information regarding anesthetic modality and 3-month functional outcome were included. The primary endpoint was a favorable functional outcome at 3 months (defined as a modified Rankin Scale score of 0-2) when using LA compared to CS (average treatment effect [ATE] determined by targeted maximum likelihood estimation). Secondary outcomes included procedural time, favorable reperfusion, complications, and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage.ResultsA total of 2204 patients were included in the analysis (763 LA, 1441 CS). In the LA group, 57.5% (n = 439) had a favorable outcome at 3 months compared to 55.6% (n = 801) in the CS group (ATE 0.04 [0.00-0.07]; adjusted odds ratio 1.16 [1.01-1.34]; p = 0.04). No significant difference was found between groups regarding reperfusion rates, procedural times, and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage.ConclusionIn this large, Canadian multicenter cohort of patients undergoing EVT for anterior circulation AIS, LA was safe and led to better functional outcomes at 3 months compared to CS. Given its simplicity and potential benefits, LA warrants greater consideration in clinical practice and inclusion as a treatment arm in future randomized controlled trials studying the optimal anesthetic strategy for EVT.</p>","PeriodicalId":49174,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":"15910199251349662"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12174581/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventional Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15910199251349662","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

IntroductionThere are several possible anesthetic strategies during endovascular therapy (EVT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS), including general anesthesia (GA), conscious sedation (CS), and local anesthesia (LA). While randomized trials have not shown a clear advantage of GA or CS, LA remains understudied. We aimed to determine if LA is associated with better functional outcomes compared to CS in a Canadian EVT registry.Patients and MethodsA retrospective analysis of the OPTIMISE registry was conducted, focusing on adult patients with anterior circulation AIS treated with EVT between January 2018 and December 2021. Patients with available information regarding anesthetic modality and 3-month functional outcome were included. The primary endpoint was a favorable functional outcome at 3 months (defined as a modified Rankin Scale score of 0-2) when using LA compared to CS (average treatment effect [ATE] determined by targeted maximum likelihood estimation). Secondary outcomes included procedural time, favorable reperfusion, complications, and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage.ResultsA total of 2204 patients were included in the analysis (763 LA, 1441 CS). In the LA group, 57.5% (n = 439) had a favorable outcome at 3 months compared to 55.6% (n = 801) in the CS group (ATE 0.04 [0.00-0.07]; adjusted odds ratio 1.16 [1.01-1.34]; p = 0.04). No significant difference was found between groups regarding reperfusion rates, procedural times, and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage.ConclusionIn this large, Canadian multicenter cohort of patients undergoing EVT for anterior circulation AIS, LA was safe and led to better functional outcomes at 3 months compared to CS. Given its simplicity and potential benefits, LA warrants greater consideration in clinical practice and inclusion as a treatment arm in future randomized controlled trials studying the optimal anesthetic strategy for EVT.

局部麻醉在急性缺血性卒中血管内取栓术中比清醒镇静具有更好的功能结果:一项OPTIMISE注册的回顾性分析。
在急性缺血性卒中(AIS)血管内治疗(EVT)过程中,有几种可能的麻醉策略,包括全身麻醉(GA)、清醒镇静(CS)和局部麻醉(LA)。虽然随机试验没有显示出GA或CS的明显优势,但LA仍未得到充分研究。我们的目的是确定在加拿大EVT登记中,与CS相比,LA是否与更好的功能结果相关。患者和方法对OPTIMISE注册表进行回顾性分析,重点是2018年1月至2021年12月期间接受EVT治疗的成年前循环AIS患者。有麻醉方式和3个月功能结局可用信息的患者纳入研究。主要终点是与CS(由目标最大似然估计确定的平均治疗效果[ATE])相比,使用LA在3个月时具有良好的功能结局(定义为修改的Rankin量表评分0-2)。次要结果包括手术时间、有利的再灌注、并发症和症状性颅内出血。结果共纳入2204例患者(LA 763例,CS 1441例)。在LA组中,57.5% (n = 439)的患者在3个月时预后良好,而CS组为55.6% (n = 801) (ATE为0.04 [0.00-0.07];校正优势比1.16 [1.01-1.34];p = 0.04)。在再灌注率、手术时间和症状性颅内出血方面,两组间无显著差异。在这个加拿大多中心的接受EVT治疗前循环AIS患者的大型队列中,LA是安全的,与CS相比,LA在3个月时的功能结果更好。鉴于其简单性和潜在的益处,LA在临床实践中值得更多的考虑,并在未来研究EVT最佳麻醉策略的随机对照试验中作为治疗组。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Interventional Neuroradiology
Interventional Neuroradiology CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
11.80%
发文量
192
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Interventional Neuroradiology (INR) is a peer-reviewed clinical practice journal documenting the current state of interventional neuroradiology worldwide. INR publishes original clinical observations, descriptions of new techniques or procedures, case reports, and articles on the ethical and social aspects of related health care. Original research published in INR is related to the practice of interventional neuroradiology...
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信