Interactive effects between pregnancy-related alcohol policies and state spirits availability on infant and maternal outcomes.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Alex Schulte, Meenakshi S Subbaraman, Guodong Liu, William C Kerr, Pamela J Trangenstein, Sarah C M Roberts
{"title":"Interactive effects between pregnancy-related alcohol policies and state spirits availability on infant and maternal outcomes.","authors":"Alex Schulte, Meenakshi S Subbaraman, Guodong Liu, William C Kerr, Pamela J Trangenstein, Sarah C M Roberts","doi":"10.1080/00952990.2025.2503459","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Background:</i> Most state policies targeting pregnant people's alcohol use are ineffective, while some broader alcohol availability policies like government monopolies on retail spirits sales are effective. Previous research has not explored interactions of these policies.<i>Objective:</i> Analyze whether there are interactive effects between pregnancy-specific alcohol policies and government monopolies over retail spirits sales on infant and maternal outcomes.<i>Methods:</i> Outcome data were from Merative MarketScan®, a commercial insurance claims database, and included individuals who birthed singletons between 2006 and 2019 (<i>N</i> = 1,432,979 birthing person-infant pairs). We examined interactions between six pregnancy-specific policies and government monopolies. Regression models include (monopolyXpregnancy-specific policy) interaction terms, state and year fixed-effects, state-specific time trends, individual- and state-level controls, and clustering by state.<i>Results:</i> Associations of pregnancy-specific policies were generally stronger, or only present, in monopoly states. However, there was no consistent pattern regarding direction. Conversely, government monopolies consistently related to reduced infant maltreatment, with the largest effect when Priority Treatment for pregnant women policies were also in place [-1.64% (95% CI -1.87, -1.41)]. Protective associations of government monopolies on infant morbidities differed across reporting policies; for example, monopolies were protective without Reporting Requirements for child welfare [-0.28% (95% CI -0.40, -0.17)], but no longer protective with this policy [0.00% (95% CI -0.53, 0.55)].<i>Conclusions:</i> Government monopolies on retail spirits sales generally relate to reduced infant maltreatment and morbidities, although some pregnancy-specific alcohol policies blunt the protective effects of government monopolies. Repealing some ineffective pregnancy-specific policies - e.g. some Reporting Requirements - in monopoly states might improve infant outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":48957,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00952990.2025.2503459","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Most state policies targeting pregnant people's alcohol use are ineffective, while some broader alcohol availability policies like government monopolies on retail spirits sales are effective. Previous research has not explored interactions of these policies.Objective: Analyze whether there are interactive effects between pregnancy-specific alcohol policies and government monopolies over retail spirits sales on infant and maternal outcomes.Methods: Outcome data were from Merative MarketScan®, a commercial insurance claims database, and included individuals who birthed singletons between 2006 and 2019 (N = 1,432,979 birthing person-infant pairs). We examined interactions between six pregnancy-specific policies and government monopolies. Regression models include (monopolyXpregnancy-specific policy) interaction terms, state and year fixed-effects, state-specific time trends, individual- and state-level controls, and clustering by state.Results: Associations of pregnancy-specific policies were generally stronger, or only present, in monopoly states. However, there was no consistent pattern regarding direction. Conversely, government monopolies consistently related to reduced infant maltreatment, with the largest effect when Priority Treatment for pregnant women policies were also in place [-1.64% (95% CI -1.87, -1.41)]. Protective associations of government monopolies on infant morbidities differed across reporting policies; for example, monopolies were protective without Reporting Requirements for child welfare [-0.28% (95% CI -0.40, -0.17)], but no longer protective with this policy [0.00% (95% CI -0.53, 0.55)].Conclusions: Government monopolies on retail spirits sales generally relate to reduced infant maltreatment and morbidities, although some pregnancy-specific alcohol policies blunt the protective effects of government monopolies. Repealing some ineffective pregnancy-specific policies - e.g. some Reporting Requirements - in monopoly states might improve infant outcomes.

与怀孕有关的酒精政策和国家烈酒供应对婴儿和产妇结局的相互影响。
背景:大多数针对孕妇饮酒的国家政策是无效的,而一些更广泛的酒精供应政策,如政府垄断零售烈酒销售是有效的。以前的研究没有探讨这些政策的相互作用。目的:分析孕期酒精政策和政府对酒精零售销售的垄断对母婴结局是否存在交互影响。方法:结局数据来自商业保险索赔数据库Merative MarketScan®,包括2006年至2019年间生育单胎的个体(N = 1,432,979对生育人-婴儿)。我们研究了六项针对怀孕的政策与政府垄断之间的相互作用。回归模型包括(特定于垄断和怀孕的政策)相互作用项、州和年份固定效应、州特定的时间趋势、个人和州级别的控制,以及各州的聚类。结果:妊娠特异性政策的关联通常更强,或仅存在于垄断国家。然而,在方向上没有一致的模式。相反,政府垄断始终与减少婴儿虐待有关,当孕妇优先治疗政策也到位时,效果最大[-1.64% (95% CI -1.87, -1.41)]。政府垄断婴儿发病率的保护性关联因报告政策而异;例如,垄断在没有儿童福利报告要求的情况下具有保护作用[-0.28% (95% CI -0.40, -0.17)],但在这项政策下不再具有保护作用[0.00% (95% CI -0.53, 0.55)]。结论:政府对零售烈酒销售的垄断通常与减少婴儿虐待和发病率有关,尽管一些针对怀孕的酒精政策削弱了政府垄断的保护作用。在垄断国家废除一些无效的针对怀孕的政策——例如一些报告要求——可能会改善婴儿的结局。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse (AJDAA) is an international journal published six times per year and provides an important and stimulating venue for the exchange of ideas between the researchers working in diverse areas, including public policy, epidemiology, neurobiology, and the treatment of addictive disorders. AJDAA includes a wide range of translational research, covering preclinical and clinical aspects of the field. AJDAA covers these topics with focused data presentations and authoritative reviews of timely developments in our field. Manuscripts exploring addictions other than substance use disorders are encouraged. Reviews and Perspectives of emerging fields are given priority consideration. Areas of particular interest include: public health policy; novel research methodologies; human and animal pharmacology; human translational studies, including neuroimaging; pharmacological and behavioral treatments; new modalities of care; molecular and family genetic studies; medicinal use of substances traditionally considered substances of abuse.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信