Şeyma Nur Ertekin, Abe D Hofman, Han van der Maas, Dora Matzke, Carolin Streitberger, Julia M Haaf
{"title":"Extending empirical benchmarks of working memory to children: Insights from an adaptive learning environment.","authors":"Şeyma Nur Ertekin, Abe D Hofman, Han van der Maas, Dora Matzke, Carolin Streitberger, Julia M Haaf","doi":"10.1037/dev0001992","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this study, we explored whether the key benchmarks of working memory processing identified in adults by Oberauer et al. (2018a) also apply to children, using data from a large adaptive learning environment. Over 9,000 children from Dutch primary schools (age between 6 and 12) played two serial recall tasks (verbal domain and visuospatial domain), providing a means for studying working memory processing in students' regular educational environment. Using Bayesian multilevel modeling, we found that the difficulty of the over 2,000 lists was affected by characteristics related to response facilitation, spatial grouping, and set size. Set size and spatial grouping also affected the accuracy of students' responses. Furthermore, we investigated primacy and recency effects and found that, as expected, the effect of serial position of items varies across set size. This result is also in line with previous findings on developmental changes in working memory processing, where primacy and recency effects change as children grow older. Finally, key benchmark findings on error categorization were replicated, revealing that children were more prone to omission and intrusion errors than transposition errors. However, as children matured, the proportion of transposition errors increased. Additionally, we found limited evidence for an infill effect in transpositions in the verbal working memory tasks and substantial evidence for locality constraints on transpositions in both tasks. Our findings provide an understanding of the development of working memory processing in children and highlight the robustness of classical working memory findings in online educational data. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48464,"journal":{"name":"Developmental Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"1963-1990"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developmental Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0001992","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In this study, we explored whether the key benchmarks of working memory processing identified in adults by Oberauer et al. (2018a) also apply to children, using data from a large adaptive learning environment. Over 9,000 children from Dutch primary schools (age between 6 and 12) played two serial recall tasks (verbal domain and visuospatial domain), providing a means for studying working memory processing in students' regular educational environment. Using Bayesian multilevel modeling, we found that the difficulty of the over 2,000 lists was affected by characteristics related to response facilitation, spatial grouping, and set size. Set size and spatial grouping also affected the accuracy of students' responses. Furthermore, we investigated primacy and recency effects and found that, as expected, the effect of serial position of items varies across set size. This result is also in line with previous findings on developmental changes in working memory processing, where primacy and recency effects change as children grow older. Finally, key benchmark findings on error categorization were replicated, revealing that children were more prone to omission and intrusion errors than transposition errors. However, as children matured, the proportion of transposition errors increased. Additionally, we found limited evidence for an infill effect in transpositions in the verbal working memory tasks and substantial evidence for locality constraints on transpositions in both tasks. Our findings provide an understanding of the development of working memory processing in children and highlight the robustness of classical working memory findings in online educational data. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
期刊介绍:
Developmental Psychology ® publishes articles that significantly advance knowledge and theory about development across the life span. The journal focuses on seminal empirical contributions. The journal occasionally publishes exceptionally strong scholarly reviews and theoretical or methodological articles. Studies of any aspect of psychological development are appropriate, as are studies of the biological, social, and cultural factors that affect development. The journal welcomes not only laboratory-based experimental studies but studies employing other rigorous methodologies, such as ethnographies, field research, and secondary analyses of large data sets. We especially seek submissions in new areas of inquiry and submissions that will address contradictory findings or controversies in the field as well as the generalizability of extant findings in new populations. Although most articles in this journal address human development, studies of other species are appropriate if they have important implications for human development. Submissions can consist of single manuscripts, proposed sections, or short reports.