Comparing Health Outcomes in Patients with Hypertension Receiving Continuity of Care From Regular Family Physician With Care From Multiple Physicians: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

IF 3 Q1 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
Galih Kunarso, Ngiap Chuan Tan
{"title":"Comparing Health Outcomes in Patients with Hypertension Receiving Continuity of Care From Regular Family Physician With Care From Multiple Physicians: A Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Galih Kunarso, Ngiap Chuan Tan","doi":"10.1177/21501319251346702","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Effective hypertension management requires long-term lifestyle and medication adherence facilitated by regular physician. Higher continuity of care (CoC) is postulated to lead to better outcomes.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study compares health outcomes of patients with hypertension receiving CoC from single family physicians over 5-year period with those treated by multiple physicians.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective cohort study was conducted using electronic medical records from multi-ethnic Asian adults with hypertension and other non-communicable diseases. Patients managed in Family Physician Clinic (FPC) across 7 Singapore public primary care polyclinics from 2015 to 2019 were propensity scores matched with those treated by multiple physicians in General Clinic (GC) of the same polyclinics. CoC Index (COCI), health outcomes including blood pressure (BP), LDL-Cholesterol (LDL-C), cardiovascular complications and preventive measures were compared until 2021.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysis of 6520 patients (mean age 64.8 years, 56% female, 76% Chinese) showed FPC cohort had higher COCI (mean = 0.432 vs 0.073; <i>P</i> < .001). This was associated with further reduction in diastolic BP of 0.13 mmHg (<i>P</i> < .001) and LDL-C levels of 0.01 mmol/L (<i>P</i> = .001) per year faster than in GC, with higher proportion of patients meeting LDL-C targets (74.1% vs 68.0%; <i>P</i> < .001) in 2021. FPC cohort also showed greater influenza (OR = 2.88; <i>P</i> < .001) and pneumococcal (OR = 1.34; <i>P</i> < .001) vaccinations uptake. Subgroup analysis of patients with diabetes indicated better diabetic foot screening completion (OR = 1.34; <i>P</i> < .001). No significant improvement was found in systolic BP or cardiovascular complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Higher CoC in FPC led to clinically relevant improvement in LDL-C and vaccination, but not BP or cardiovascular complication rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":46723,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Primary Care and Community Health","volume":"16 ","pages":"21501319251346702"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12174722/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Primary Care and Community Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21501319251346702","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Effective hypertension management requires long-term lifestyle and medication adherence facilitated by regular physician. Higher continuity of care (CoC) is postulated to lead to better outcomes.

Objectives: This study compares health outcomes of patients with hypertension receiving CoC from single family physicians over 5-year period with those treated by multiple physicians.

Methods: Retrospective cohort study was conducted using electronic medical records from multi-ethnic Asian adults with hypertension and other non-communicable diseases. Patients managed in Family Physician Clinic (FPC) across 7 Singapore public primary care polyclinics from 2015 to 2019 were propensity scores matched with those treated by multiple physicians in General Clinic (GC) of the same polyclinics. CoC Index (COCI), health outcomes including blood pressure (BP), LDL-Cholesterol (LDL-C), cardiovascular complications and preventive measures were compared until 2021.

Results: Analysis of 6520 patients (mean age 64.8 years, 56% female, 76% Chinese) showed FPC cohort had higher COCI (mean = 0.432 vs 0.073; P < .001). This was associated with further reduction in diastolic BP of 0.13 mmHg (P < .001) and LDL-C levels of 0.01 mmol/L (P = .001) per year faster than in GC, with higher proportion of patients meeting LDL-C targets (74.1% vs 68.0%; P < .001) in 2021. FPC cohort also showed greater influenza (OR = 2.88; P < .001) and pneumococcal (OR = 1.34; P < .001) vaccinations uptake. Subgroup analysis of patients with diabetes indicated better diabetic foot screening completion (OR = 1.34; P < .001). No significant improvement was found in systolic BP or cardiovascular complications.

Conclusion: Higher CoC in FPC led to clinically relevant improvement in LDL-C and vaccination, but not BP or cardiovascular complication rates.

比较接受常规家庭医生和多名医生连续治疗的高血压患者的健康结果:一项回顾性队列研究
背景:有效的高血压管理需要长期的生活方式和在常规医生指导下的药物依从性。更高的护理连续性(CoC)被认为会导致更好的结果。目的:本研究比较了5年间接受单一家庭医生CoC治疗的高血压患者与接受多家医生CoC治疗的高血压患者的健康结果。方法:回顾性队列研究,使用多民族亚洲成人高血压和其他非传染性疾病的电子病历。2015年至2019年,新加坡7家公立初级保健综合诊所的家庭医生诊所(FPC)管理的患者倾向得分与同一综合诊所的普通诊所(GC)的多名医生治疗的患者相匹配。CoC指数(COCI)、健康结果包括血压(BP)、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)、心血管并发症和预防措施的比较一直持续到2021年。结果:6520例患者(平均年龄64.8岁,女性56%,中国人76%)的分析显示,FPC队列的COCI较高(平均= 0.432 vs 0.073;P P P = .001),达到LDL-C目标的患者比例更高(74.1% vs 68.0%;结论:FPC患者CoC升高导致LDL-C和疫苗接种的临床相关改善,但对血压和心血管并发症发生率没有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
2.80%
发文量
183
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信