Chandler S Hinson, Hallie Masters, MengJie Hu, Benjamin Michaels, Matthew Beyers, Ronald M Brooks
{"title":"Addition of Erector Spinae Nerve Block Effect on Opioid Use and Pain Levels in Reduction Mammoplasty.","authors":"Chandler S Hinson, Hallie Masters, MengJie Hu, Benjamin Michaels, Matthew Beyers, Ronald M Brooks","doi":"10.1097/GOX.0000000000006900","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Macromastia causes significant physical and emotional distress. Reduction mammoplasty often requires opioid analgesia. This study compared the efficacy of combining an erector spinae plane (ESP) block with a field block of long-acting bupivacaine (LLAB) versus LLAB alone in managing pain and opioid use during breast reduction surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective review of breast reduction patients from March 2021 to March 2022 at an academic center. The variables included specimen weights, liposuction volume, opioid use (standardized to morphine milligram equivalents [MME]), and pain scores (0-10 scale). Two-sample <i>z</i> tests were used to assess significance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety-eight patients were analyzed: 50 received ESP blocks with LLAB, and 48 received LLAB alone. The ESP block group had significantly lower perioperative opioid use (33.5 versus 89.8 MME, <i>P</i> < 0.001). Preoperative opioid use was similar (27.8 versus 31.5 MME, <i>P</i> = 0.16). Postoperative opioid use trended lower in the ESP block group (22.5 versus 31.4 MME, <i>P</i> = 0.06). ESP block patients also reported lower postanesthesia care unit pain scores (4.3 versus 6.0, <i>P</i> < 0.001) and fewer postdischarge pain medication refills (12.0% versus 20.8%, <i>P</i> = 0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ESP blocks with LLAB reduced perioperative opioid use, immediate postoperative pain, and the need for postdischarge refills compared with LLAB alone. Although postoperative opioid reduction was not statistically significant, a clear trend was observed. These findings support further evaluation and potential adoption of the ESP block in breast reduction procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":20149,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","volume":"13 6","pages":"e6900"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12169968/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000006900","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Macromastia causes significant physical and emotional distress. Reduction mammoplasty often requires opioid analgesia. This study compared the efficacy of combining an erector spinae plane (ESP) block with a field block of long-acting bupivacaine (LLAB) versus LLAB alone in managing pain and opioid use during breast reduction surgery.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of breast reduction patients from March 2021 to March 2022 at an academic center. The variables included specimen weights, liposuction volume, opioid use (standardized to morphine milligram equivalents [MME]), and pain scores (0-10 scale). Two-sample z tests were used to assess significance.
Results: Ninety-eight patients were analyzed: 50 received ESP blocks with LLAB, and 48 received LLAB alone. The ESP block group had significantly lower perioperative opioid use (33.5 versus 89.8 MME, P < 0.001). Preoperative opioid use was similar (27.8 versus 31.5 MME, P = 0.16). Postoperative opioid use trended lower in the ESP block group (22.5 versus 31.4 MME, P = 0.06). ESP block patients also reported lower postanesthesia care unit pain scores (4.3 versus 6.0, P < 0.001) and fewer postdischarge pain medication refills (12.0% versus 20.8%, P = 0.02).
Conclusions: ESP blocks with LLAB reduced perioperative opioid use, immediate postoperative pain, and the need for postdischarge refills compared with LLAB alone. Although postoperative opioid reduction was not statistically significant, a clear trend was observed. These findings support further evaluation and potential adoption of the ESP block in breast reduction procedures.
背景:大乳突症会引起严重的身体和精神困扰。缩乳术通常需要阿片类药物止痛。本研究比较了竖脊肌平面(ESP)阻滞联合长效布比卡因(LLAB)阻滞与LLAB单独阻滞在缩胸手术中控制疼痛和阿片类药物使用的疗效。方法:对某学术中心2021年3月至2022年3月的缩胸患者进行回顾性分析。变量包括标本重量、吸脂量、阿片类药物使用(标准化为吗啡毫克当量[MME])和疼痛评分(0-10分)。采用双样本z检验评估显著性。结果:98例患者中,50例接受LLAB联合ESP阻滞治疗,48例单独接受LLAB治疗。ESP阻滞组围手术期阿片类药物使用明显降低(33.5 MME vs 89.8 MME, P < 0.001)。术前阿片类药物使用相似(27.8 MME对31.5 MME, P = 0.16)。ESP阻滞组术后阿片类药物使用趋势较低(22.5 MME vs 31.4 MME, P = 0.06)。ESP阻滞患者还报告了较低的麻醉后护理单元疼痛评分(4.3比6.0,P < 0.001)和较少的出院后止痛药再次使用(12.0%比20.8%,P = 0.02)。结论:与单独使用LLAB相比,LLAB联合ESP阻滞减少了围手术期阿片类药物的使用、术后即刻疼痛和出院后再填充的需求。虽然术后阿片类药物减少没有统计学意义,但有明显的趋势。这些发现支持进一步的评估和在缩乳手术中应用ESP块的可能性。
期刊介绍:
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open is an open access, peer reviewed, international journal focusing on global plastic and reconstructive surgery.Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open publishes on all areas of plastic and reconstructive surgery, including basic science/experimental studies pertinent to the field and also clinical articles on such topics as: breast reconstruction, head and neck surgery, pediatric and craniofacial surgery, hand and microsurgery, wound healing, and cosmetic and aesthetic surgery. Clinical studies, experimental articles, ideas and innovations, and techniques and case reports are all welcome article types. Manuscript submission is open to all surgeons, researchers, and other health care providers world-wide who wish to communicate their research results on topics related to plastic and reconstructive surgery. Furthermore, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open, a complimentary journal to Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, provides an open access venue for the publication of those research studies sponsored by private and public funding agencies that require open access publication of study results. Its mission is to disseminate high quality, peer reviewed research in plastic and reconstructive surgery to the widest possible global audience, through an open access platform. As an open access journal, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open offers its content for free to any viewer. Authors of articles retain their copyright to the materials published. Additionally, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open provides rapid review and publication of accepted papers.