Retrospective Cohort Study of Mesh-Related Complications of Minimally Invasive Sacrocervicopexy in 603 cases.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Vi Duong, Stephanie Schatzman-Bone, Joe Shi, Kaitlyn James, Milena M Weinstein
{"title":"Retrospective Cohort Study of Mesh-Related Complications of Minimally Invasive Sacrocervicopexy in 603 cases.","authors":"Vi Duong, Stephanie Schatzman-Bone, Joe Shi, Kaitlyn James, Milena M Weinstein","doi":"10.1007/s00192-025-06194-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction and hypothesis: </strong>Minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy (SCP) with concurrent supracervical hysterectomy (SCH) has become the preferred treatment for uterovaginal prolapse over traditional open surgery. However, there is a lack of standardization in surgical materials and techniques, leading to variations in outcomes. This study aims to examine mesh-related complications in women undergoing SCP with concurrent SCH.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted within a large academic hospital system between May 2007 and December 2021. Participants who underwent SCP with concurrent SCH were included. Demographics, perioperative characteristics, and postoperative data were collected. Mesh complications were identified using CPT codes and confirmed by chart review. Parametric and nonparametric tests were used to assess differences in participant and surgical factors, with significance set at p ≤ 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 603 participants were analyzed with a mean follow-up of 55 months. Most underwent laparoscopic SCP (87%), with 53% performed by minimally invasive gynecologic surgery (MIGS) and 47% performed by urogynecology and reconstructive pelvic surgery (URPS). Mesh exposure occurred in 1.2% of cases and was significantly associated with permanent multifilament braided suture use for vaginal mesh attachment (p < 0.001). All exposures occurred in surgeries performed by MIGS surgeons. No significant associations were found with smoking, menopausal status, estrogen use, primary energy instrumentation, or mesh weight. Notably, no mesh erosions were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Mesh-related complications following SCP with concurrent SCH are rare. Permanent multifilament braided suture was the only factor associated with mesh exposure. Further research is needed to evaluate surgical factors and optimize techniques.</p>","PeriodicalId":14355,"journal":{"name":"International Urogynecology Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Urogynecology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-025-06194-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis: Minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy (SCP) with concurrent supracervical hysterectomy (SCH) has become the preferred treatment for uterovaginal prolapse over traditional open surgery. However, there is a lack of standardization in surgical materials and techniques, leading to variations in outcomes. This study aims to examine mesh-related complications in women undergoing SCP with concurrent SCH.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted within a large academic hospital system between May 2007 and December 2021. Participants who underwent SCP with concurrent SCH were included. Demographics, perioperative characteristics, and postoperative data were collected. Mesh complications were identified using CPT codes and confirmed by chart review. Parametric and nonparametric tests were used to assess differences in participant and surgical factors, with significance set at p ≤ 0.05.

Results: A total of 603 participants were analyzed with a mean follow-up of 55 months. Most underwent laparoscopic SCP (87%), with 53% performed by minimally invasive gynecologic surgery (MIGS) and 47% performed by urogynecology and reconstructive pelvic surgery (URPS). Mesh exposure occurred in 1.2% of cases and was significantly associated with permanent multifilament braided suture use for vaginal mesh attachment (p < 0.001). All exposures occurred in surgeries performed by MIGS surgeons. No significant associations were found with smoking, menopausal status, estrogen use, primary energy instrumentation, or mesh weight. Notably, no mesh erosions were observed.

Conclusion: Mesh-related complications following SCP with concurrent SCH are rare. Permanent multifilament braided suture was the only factor associated with mesh exposure. Further research is needed to evaluate surgical factors and optimize techniques.

603例微创骶颈固定术网孔相关并发症回顾性队列研究。
简介与假设:微创骶阴道固定术(SCP)联合宫颈上子宫切除术(SCH)已成为治疗子宫阴道脱垂的首选方法,超过传统的开放手术。然而,由于手术材料和技术缺乏标准化,导致结果的变化。本研究旨在探讨女性SCP并发sch的网状相关并发症。方法:2007年5月至2021年12月在一家大型学术医院系统进行回顾性队列研究。同时接受SCP并伴有SCH的参与者也包括在内。收集人口统计学、围手术期特征和术后数据。使用CPT代码识别补片并发症,并通过图表检查确认。采用参数检验和非参数检验评估参与者和手术因素的差异,p≤0.05为显著性。结果:共分析603名参与者,平均随访55个月。大多数患者接受腹腔镜SCP手术(87%),其中53%采用微创妇科手术(MIGS), 47%采用泌尿妇科和盆腔重建手术(URPS)。1.2%的病例出现补片暴露,并且与使用永久性多丝编织缝线进行阴道补片附着密切相关(p结论:SCP并发SCH后补片相关并发症非常罕见。永久性多丝编织缝线是唯一与补片暴露相关的因素。需要进一步的研究来评估手术因素和优化技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
22.20%
发文量
406
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Urogynecology Journal is the official journal of the International Urogynecological Association (IUGA).The International Urogynecology Journal has evolved in response to a perceived need amongst the clinicians, scientists, and researchers active in the field of urogynecology and pelvic floor disorders. Gynecologists, urologists, physiotherapists, nurses and basic scientists require regular means of communication within this field of pelvic floor dysfunction to express new ideas and research, and to review clinical practice in the diagnosis and treatment of women with disorders of the pelvic floor. This Journal has adopted the peer review process for all original contributions and will maintain high standards with regard to the research published therein. The clinical approach to urogynecology and pelvic floor disorders will be emphasized with each issue containing clinically relevant material that will be immediately applicable for clinical medicine. This publication covers all aspects of the field in an interdisciplinary fashion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信