Bone-Targeted High-Intensity Training Does Not Reduce Quality of Life Related to Pelvic Floor Dysfunction: The MEDEX-OP Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Melanie Kistler-Fischbacher, Benjamin K Weeks, Belinda R Beck
{"title":"Bone-Targeted High-Intensity Training Does Not Reduce Quality of Life Related to Pelvic Floor Dysfunction: The MEDEX-OP Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Melanie Kistler-Fischbacher, Benjamin K Weeks, Belinda R Beck","doi":"10.1007/s00192-025-06187-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction and hypothesis: </strong>High-intensity resistance and impact training (HiRIT) is the most effective exercise for improving bone strength, but it is traditionally discouraged for individuals with pelvic floor dysfunction, a condition that often coexists with osteoporosis. We therefore aimed to compare the effect of HiRIT with low-intensity Pilates-based exercise (LiPBE) on quality of life related to pelvic floor dysfunction in postmenopausal women.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Healthy postmenopausal women with low bone mass were recruited and randomized to 8-month, twice-weekly supervised HiRIT or LiPBE. Pelvic floor-related quality of life was assessed using the Pelvic Floor Disability Index (PFDI-20) and Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7). Subgroup analysis was conducted to explore the overall effect of exercise (HiRIT or LiPBE) on PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7 total scores in individuals with and without a history of pelvic organ prolapse (POP).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 115 women were included (mean age 64.4 years). There were no significant between-group differences in 8-month change in the PFDI-20 or its subscales, or the PFIQ-7. There was a significant within-group improvement in the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory subscale of the PFDI-20 (-2.3 [95% CI -4.4, 0.2]) in the LiPBE group. Exploratory subgroup analyses of the combined exercise groups showed an improvement in the PFDI-20 among participants with a history of POP over the 8-month training period (-11.9 [95% CI -22.8, -1.1]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings suggest no negative effects of bone-targeted HiRIT on pelvic floor-related quality of life in postmenopausal women. On the contrary, our data provide preliminary evidence that exercise may have beneficial effects on pelvic floor health. However, further studies are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":14355,"journal":{"name":"International Urogynecology Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Urogynecology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-025-06187-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis: High-intensity resistance and impact training (HiRIT) is the most effective exercise for improving bone strength, but it is traditionally discouraged for individuals with pelvic floor dysfunction, a condition that often coexists with osteoporosis. We therefore aimed to compare the effect of HiRIT with low-intensity Pilates-based exercise (LiPBE) on quality of life related to pelvic floor dysfunction in postmenopausal women.

Methods: Healthy postmenopausal women with low bone mass were recruited and randomized to 8-month, twice-weekly supervised HiRIT or LiPBE. Pelvic floor-related quality of life was assessed using the Pelvic Floor Disability Index (PFDI-20) and Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7). Subgroup analysis was conducted to explore the overall effect of exercise (HiRIT or LiPBE) on PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7 total scores in individuals with and without a history of pelvic organ prolapse (POP).

Results: A total of 115 women were included (mean age 64.4 years). There were no significant between-group differences in 8-month change in the PFDI-20 or its subscales, or the PFIQ-7. There was a significant within-group improvement in the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory subscale of the PFDI-20 (-2.3 [95% CI -4.4, 0.2]) in the LiPBE group. Exploratory subgroup analyses of the combined exercise groups showed an improvement in the PFDI-20 among participants with a history of POP over the 8-month training period (-11.9 [95% CI -22.8, -1.1]).

Conclusion: Our findings suggest no negative effects of bone-targeted HiRIT on pelvic floor-related quality of life in postmenopausal women. On the contrary, our data provide preliminary evidence that exercise may have beneficial effects on pelvic floor health. However, further studies are needed.

针对骨骼的高强度训练不会降低与盆底功能障碍相关的生活质量:MEDEX-OP随机对照试验
介绍和假设:高强度抵抗和冲击训练(HiRIT)是提高骨强度最有效的运动,但传统上不鼓励盆底功能障碍患者进行,因为盆底功能障碍通常与骨质疏松症并存。因此,我们旨在比较HiRIT与低强度普拉提运动(LiPBE)对绝经后妇女盆底功能障碍相关生活质量的影响。方法:招募健康的低骨量绝经后妇女,随机分为8个月,每周两次的HiRIT或LiPBE。使用盆底残疾指数(PFDI-20)和盆底影响问卷(PFIQ-7)评估盆底相关生活质量。进行亚组分析,探讨运动(HiRIT或LiPBE)对有或无盆腔器官脱垂(POP)病史个体PFDI-20和PFIQ-7总分的总体影响。结果:共纳入115例女性,平均年龄64.4岁。PFDI-20或其分量表、PFIQ-7的8个月变化在组间无显著差异。LiPBE组盆腔器官脱垂窘迫量表(PFDI-20)组内显著改善(-2.3 [95% CI -4.4, 0.2])。联合运动组的探索性亚组分析显示,在8个月的训练期中,有POP病史的参与者的PFDI-20有所改善(-11.9 [95% CI -22.8, -1.1])。结论:我们的研究结果表明,骨靶向HiRIT对绝经后妇女盆底相关生活质量没有负面影响。相反,我们的数据提供了初步证据,表明运动可能对盆底健康有有益的影响。然而,还需要进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
22.20%
发文量
406
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Urogynecology Journal is the official journal of the International Urogynecological Association (IUGA).The International Urogynecology Journal has evolved in response to a perceived need amongst the clinicians, scientists, and researchers active in the field of urogynecology and pelvic floor disorders. Gynecologists, urologists, physiotherapists, nurses and basic scientists require regular means of communication within this field of pelvic floor dysfunction to express new ideas and research, and to review clinical practice in the diagnosis and treatment of women with disorders of the pelvic floor. This Journal has adopted the peer review process for all original contributions and will maintain high standards with regard to the research published therein. The clinical approach to urogynecology and pelvic floor disorders will be emphasized with each issue containing clinically relevant material that will be immediately applicable for clinical medicine. This publication covers all aspects of the field in an interdisciplinary fashion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信