Correlation of retinal thickness, macular volume, and their fluctuation with visual outcomes in patients with macular edema due to retinal vein occlusion.

IF 2.4 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Kwanchanok Rattanalert, Patama Bhurayanontachai, Mansing Ratanasukon, Pichai Jirarattanasopa, Wantanee Dangboon Tsutsumi
{"title":"Correlation of retinal thickness, macular volume, and their fluctuation with visual outcomes in patients with macular edema due to retinal vein occlusion.","authors":"Kwanchanok Rattanalert, Patama Bhurayanontachai, Mansing Ratanasukon, Pichai Jirarattanasopa, Wantanee Dangboon Tsutsumi","doi":"10.1186/s40942-025-00693-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to examine the utility of macular volume (MV), central retinal thickness (CRT), and their fluctuations for predicting post-treatment visual acuity in patients with macular edema (ME) secondary to retinal vein occlusion (RVO).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included patients treated with intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy for ME due to RVO at a tertiary university hospital between August 2016 and July 2020. We identify the correlation of the MV, CRT, with their fluctuations, and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) measured using optical coherence tomography at baseline and at 1-, 3-, 6-, and 12-months post-treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 74 eyes included, 27 and 47 had central RVO (CRVO) and branch RVO (BRVO), respectively. Following anti-VEGF therapy both, the CRVO and BRVO group exhibited significant improvements in BCVA, CRT, and MV compared to baseline. In all patients, MV was consistently correlated with BCVA, whereas CRT was correlated with BCVA at selected time points. In patients with CRVO, MV was a better predictor of post-treatment visual outcomes than CRT. Moreover, fluctuations in CRT and MV correlated with BCVA over 12 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MV yielded more correlation with visual outcomes in patients with RVO and ME receiving anti-VEGF therapy than CRT. Considering concurrent MV and CRT measurements could enhance more precision of treatment assessment, especially in CRVO patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":14289,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Retina and Vitreous","volume":"11 1","pages":"67"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12168338/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Retina and Vitreous","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40942-025-00693-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to examine the utility of macular volume (MV), central retinal thickness (CRT), and their fluctuations for predicting post-treatment visual acuity in patients with macular edema (ME) secondary to retinal vein occlusion (RVO).

Methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients treated with intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy for ME due to RVO at a tertiary university hospital between August 2016 and July 2020. We identify the correlation of the MV, CRT, with their fluctuations, and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) measured using optical coherence tomography at baseline and at 1-, 3-, 6-, and 12-months post-treatment.

Results: Among the 74 eyes included, 27 and 47 had central RVO (CRVO) and branch RVO (BRVO), respectively. Following anti-VEGF therapy both, the CRVO and BRVO group exhibited significant improvements in BCVA, CRT, and MV compared to baseline. In all patients, MV was consistently correlated with BCVA, whereas CRT was correlated with BCVA at selected time points. In patients with CRVO, MV was a better predictor of post-treatment visual outcomes than CRT. Moreover, fluctuations in CRT and MV correlated with BCVA over 12 months.

Conclusions: MV yielded more correlation with visual outcomes in patients with RVO and ME receiving anti-VEGF therapy than CRT. Considering concurrent MV and CRT measurements could enhance more precision of treatment assessment, especially in CRVO patients.

视网膜静脉阻塞引起的黄斑水肿患者视网膜厚度、黄斑体积及其波动与视力结果的相关性
背景:本研究旨在探讨黄斑体积(MV)、视网膜中央厚度(CRT)及其波动对视网膜静脉阻塞(RVO)继发黄斑水肿(ME)患者治疗后视力的预测作用。方法:本回顾性队列研究纳入了2016年8月至2020年7月在某三级大学医院接受玻璃体内抗血管内皮生长因子(anti-VEGF)治疗RVO所致ME的患者。我们确定了MV、CRT及其波动的相关性,以及在基线和治疗后1、3、6和12个月使用光学相干断层扫描测量的最佳矫正视力(BCVA)。结果:74只眼中枢性RVO (CRVO) 27只眼,分支性RVO (BRVO) 47只眼。在抗vegf治疗后,与基线相比,CRVO组和BRVO组的BCVA、CRT和MV均有显著改善。在所有患者中,MV与BCVA一致相关,而CRT在选定的时间点与BCVA相关。在CRVO患者中,MV比CRT更能预测治疗后的视力结果。此外,12个月内CRT和MV的波动与BCVA相关。结论:与CRT相比,接受抗vegf治疗的RVO和ME患者的MV与视力结果的相关性更高。同时考虑MV和CRT测量可以提高治疗评估的准确性,特别是对CRVO患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
81
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Retina and Vitreous focuses on the ophthalmic subspecialty of vitreoretinal disorders. The journal presents original articles on new approaches to diagnosis, outcomes of clinical trials, innovations in pharmacological therapy and surgical techniques, as well as basic science advances that impact clinical practice. Topical areas include, but are not limited to: -Imaging of the retina, choroid and vitreous -Innovations in optical coherence tomography (OCT) -Small-gauge vitrectomy, retinal detachment, chromovitrectomy -Electroretinography (ERG), microperimetry, other functional tests -Intraocular tumors -Retinal pharmacotherapy & drug delivery -Diabetic retinopathy & other vascular diseases -Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) & other macular entities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信