Accuracy of intraoral scans of the edentulous maxilla - an in vitro study.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Panagiotis Kontis, Jan-Frederik Güth, Christine Keul
{"title":"Accuracy of intraoral scans of the edentulous maxilla - an in vitro study.","authors":"Panagiotis Kontis, Jan-Frederik Güth, Christine Keul","doi":"10.1007/s00784-025-06419-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Investigation of the accuracy of various digitalization methods and the accuracy of digitalization of different regions of the edentulous maxilla.</p><p><strong>Material and method: </strong>A PEEK edentulous maxilla with four spherical reference geometries served as the testing model. A reference dataset (REF) was generated using a highly accurate 3D measuring instrument. The testing model was digitized as follows (n = 25/group). Direct digitalization (DD) with intraoral scanners (IOS): 1) Cerec AC Primescan (PRI), 2) Trios 4 Move (TR4), 3) Trios 3 Wireless (TR3), 4) Indirect digitalization of PVS impression with laboratory scanner 3Shape D810 (D8I). Three-dimensional deviations between REF and TEST were evaluated (GOM Inspect) in different areas of the model: 1) Complete Surface, 2) Alveolar Ridge, 3) Vestibular Ridge, 4) Palate, 5) Posterior Seal, 6) Border. Significant differences were analyzed with the Games-Howell test for trueness (p < 0.05) and multiple comparisons Levene's test for precision (for IOS: p < 0.008, for area: p < 0.003).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Group D8I revealed the best trueness for Complete Surface (7.95 µm), Palate (9.11 µm), and Border (20.22 µm). Alveolar Ridge showed for PRI (16.45 µm) and TR4 (8.96 µm) the highest trueness. Groups TR4 and PRI resulted in significantly higher precision for Alveolar Ridge. Groups TR4 and D8I demonstrated the highest precision for Palate. Complete Surface and Alveolar Ridge showed for all digitalization methods significantly higher precision.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Indirect digitalization of impressions remains the most accurate approach for capturing edentulous jaws, whereas IOS deliver datasets with clinically acceptable accuracy. Peripheral regions characterized by limited accessibility and smooth surface morphology tend to demonstrate increased deviations in the resulting digital datasets.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Indirect digitalization of the impression still appears to be the most appropriate technique to access the clinical workflow for full dentures due to the superior digitalization trueness and inclusion of functional movements. Direct and indirect digitalization show nearly equal values for precision.</p>","PeriodicalId":10461,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Oral Investigations","volume":"29 7","pages":"342"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12170734/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Oral Investigations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-025-06419-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Investigation of the accuracy of various digitalization methods and the accuracy of digitalization of different regions of the edentulous maxilla.

Material and method: A PEEK edentulous maxilla with four spherical reference geometries served as the testing model. A reference dataset (REF) was generated using a highly accurate 3D measuring instrument. The testing model was digitized as follows (n = 25/group). Direct digitalization (DD) with intraoral scanners (IOS): 1) Cerec AC Primescan (PRI), 2) Trios 4 Move (TR4), 3) Trios 3 Wireless (TR3), 4) Indirect digitalization of PVS impression with laboratory scanner 3Shape D810 (D8I). Three-dimensional deviations between REF and TEST were evaluated (GOM Inspect) in different areas of the model: 1) Complete Surface, 2) Alveolar Ridge, 3) Vestibular Ridge, 4) Palate, 5) Posterior Seal, 6) Border. Significant differences were analyzed with the Games-Howell test for trueness (p < 0.05) and multiple comparisons Levene's test for precision (for IOS: p < 0.008, for area: p < 0.003).

Results: Group D8I revealed the best trueness for Complete Surface (7.95 µm), Palate (9.11 µm), and Border (20.22 µm). Alveolar Ridge showed for PRI (16.45 µm) and TR4 (8.96 µm) the highest trueness. Groups TR4 and PRI resulted in significantly higher precision for Alveolar Ridge. Groups TR4 and D8I demonstrated the highest precision for Palate. Complete Surface and Alveolar Ridge showed for all digitalization methods significantly higher precision.

Conclusions: Indirect digitalization of impressions remains the most accurate approach for capturing edentulous jaws, whereas IOS deliver datasets with clinically acceptable accuracy. Peripheral regions characterized by limited accessibility and smooth surface morphology tend to demonstrate increased deviations in the resulting digital datasets.

Clinical relevance: Indirect digitalization of the impression still appears to be the most appropriate technique to access the clinical workflow for full dentures due to the superior digitalization trueness and inclusion of functional movements. Direct and indirect digitalization show nearly equal values for precision.

无牙上颌骨口腔内扫描的准确性及体外研究。
目的:探讨各种数字化方法的准确性及无牙颌不同区域数字化的准确性。材料与方法:以聚醚醚酮(PEEK)无牙上颌骨为实验模型。参考数据集(REF)是使用高精度的三维测量仪器生成的。试验模型数字化如下(n = 25/组)。使用口内扫描仪(IOS)直接数字化(DD): 1) Cerec AC Primescan (PRI), 2) Trios 4 Move (TR4), 3) Trios 3 Wireless (TR3), 4)使用实验室扫描仪3Shape D810 (D8I)间接数字化PVS印模。采用GOM Inspect对模型不同区域(1)全面、2)牙槽嵴、3)前庭嵴、4)上颚、5)后封闭、6)边界进行REF与TEST的三维偏差评估。结果:D8I组的完整表面(7.95µm)、上颚(9.11µm)和边界(20.22µm)的真实度最高。肺泡嵴(Alveolar Ridge)在PRI(16.45µm)和TR4(8.96µm)中准确率最高。TR4组和PRI组对牙槽嵴的定位精度显著提高。TR4组和D8I组对上颚的定位精度最高。完整表面和牙槽嵴显示,所有数字化方法的精度都显著提高。结论:间接数字化印模仍然是捕获无牙颌最准确的方法,而IOS提供的数据集具有临床可接受的准确性。外围区域以有限的可达性和光滑的表面形态为特征,往往在由此产生的数字数据集中表现出越来越大的偏差。临床相关性:印模的间接数字化仍然是进入全口义齿临床工作流程的最合适的技术,因为数字化的准确性和功能运动的包含。直接数字化和间接数字化的精度几乎相等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Oral Investigations
Clinical Oral Investigations 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
484
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The journal Clinical Oral Investigations is a multidisciplinary, international forum for publication of research from all fields of oral medicine. The journal publishes original scientific articles and invited reviews which provide up-to-date results of basic and clinical studies in oral and maxillofacial science and medicine. The aim is to clarify the relevance of new results to modern practice, for an international readership. Coverage includes maxillofacial and oral surgery, prosthetics and restorative dentistry, operative dentistry, endodontics, periodontology, orthodontics, dental materials science, clinical trials, epidemiology, pedodontics, oral implant, preventive dentistiry, oral pathology, oral basic sciences and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信