A New Dawn-Using Teletrials for Early Phase Drug Development: A Practical Guideline.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY
G Gaughran, J Zalcberg, M Voskoboynik, M Shackleton
{"title":"A New Dawn-Using Teletrials for Early Phase Drug Development: A Practical Guideline.","authors":"G Gaughran, J Zalcberg, M Voskoboynik, M Shackleton","doi":"10.1111/ajco.14202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Access to early-phase cancer clinical trials is heavily skewed toward urban patients treated at tertiary centers, creating significant inequity for regional/rural (R/R) populations. For early drug development (EDD) trials, travel requirements are a major barrier to R/R participation. Growing public and governmental policy pressure on pharmaceutical stakeholders and trial centers has driven the exploration of innovative solutions to improve access. Among these, the teletrial model, which has been effective in later-phase studies, presents an opportunity to address recruitment challenges in phase 1 trials. This article provides practical guidelines for implementing teletrials in EDD.</p><p><strong>Methods/results: </strong>This review outlines key operational, regulatory, and logistical considerations for phase 1 teletrials, covering site evaluation, ethics and governance, resource allocation, and funding models. Several teletrial frameworks are presented, tailored to the varying capabilities of satellite sites and the complexities of early-phase trials. Lessons learned from successful pilot initiatives are integrated into the recommendations to help guide site conversion and trial design.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Phase 1 teletrials are a necessary evolution in clinical trial conduct, driven by increasing demands for equitable access to life-saving therapies. Challenges, including resource-intensive set-up, cost management, and oversight requirements, are acknowledged. However, with proper planning and stakeholder collaboration, teletrials offer significant benefits: increased trial recruitment, improved R/R patient access, and reduced geographic disparities. The expansion of teletrials will be crucial for meeting the recruitment challenges posed by biomarker-driven and rare-disease studies while maintaining safety and scientific integrity.</p>","PeriodicalId":8633,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology","volume":" ","pages":"e14202"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ajco.14202","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Access to early-phase cancer clinical trials is heavily skewed toward urban patients treated at tertiary centers, creating significant inequity for regional/rural (R/R) populations. For early drug development (EDD) trials, travel requirements are a major barrier to R/R participation. Growing public and governmental policy pressure on pharmaceutical stakeholders and trial centers has driven the exploration of innovative solutions to improve access. Among these, the teletrial model, which has been effective in later-phase studies, presents an opportunity to address recruitment challenges in phase 1 trials. This article provides practical guidelines for implementing teletrials in EDD.

Methods/results: This review outlines key operational, regulatory, and logistical considerations for phase 1 teletrials, covering site evaluation, ethics and governance, resource allocation, and funding models. Several teletrial frameworks are presented, tailored to the varying capabilities of satellite sites and the complexities of early-phase trials. Lessons learned from successful pilot initiatives are integrated into the recommendations to help guide site conversion and trial design.

Discussion: Phase 1 teletrials are a necessary evolution in clinical trial conduct, driven by increasing demands for equitable access to life-saving therapies. Challenges, including resource-intensive set-up, cost management, and oversight requirements, are acknowledged. However, with proper planning and stakeholder collaboration, teletrials offer significant benefits: increased trial recruitment, improved R/R patient access, and reduced geographic disparities. The expansion of teletrials will be crucial for meeting the recruitment challenges posed by biomarker-driven and rare-disease studies while maintaining safety and scientific integrity.

一个新的黎明——在早期药物开发中使用远距试验:实用指南。
在三级中心接受治疗的城市患者严重倾向于获得早期癌症临床试验,这对地区/农村(R/R)人口造成了严重的不平等。对于早期药物开发(EDD)试验,旅行要求是R/R参与的主要障碍。公众和政府对制药利益攸关方和试验中心的政策压力越来越大,这促使人们探索创新解决方案,以改善获取途径。其中,在后期研究中有效的远程试验模型为解决第一阶段试验中的招聘挑战提供了机会。本文提供了在EDD中实施远程试验的实用指南。方法/结果:本综述概述了第一阶段远程试验的关键操作、监管和后勤考虑因素,包括场地评估、道德和治理、资源分配和资助模式。根据卫星站点的不同能力和早期试验的复杂性,提出了几种远程试验框架。从成功的试点举措中吸取的经验教训被纳入建议,以帮助指导站点转换和试验设计。讨论:第一阶段远程试验是临床试验行为的必要演变,其驱动因素是对公平获得拯救生命的疗法的需求日益增加。挑战,包括资源密集的设置、成本管理和监督要求,都是公认的。然而,通过适当的规划和利益攸关方的协作,远程试验可以带来显著的好处:增加试验招募,改善复诊/复诊患者的可及性,并减少地域差异。扩大远程试验对于应对生物标志物驱动和罕见疾病研究带来的招募挑战,同时保持安全性和科学完整性至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
175
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Asia–Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology is a multidisciplinary journal of oncology that aims to be a forum for facilitating collaboration and exchanging information on what is happening in different countries of the Asia–Pacific region in relation to cancer treatment and care. The Journal is ideally positioned to receive publications that deal with diversity in cancer behavior, management and outcome related to ethnic, cultural, economic and other differences between populations. In addition to original articles, the Journal publishes reviews, editorials, letters to the Editor and short communications. Case reports are generally not considered for publication, only exceptional papers in which Editors find extraordinary oncological value may be considered for review. The Journal encourages clinical studies, particularly prospectively designed clinical trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信