Next-generation machine learning model to measure the Norberg angle on canine hip radiographs increases accuracy and time to completion.

IF 1.3 3区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES
George C Hansen, Yuxiao Yao, Anthony J Fischetti, Anthony Gonzalez, Ian Porter, Rory J Todhunter, Youshan Zhang
{"title":"Next-generation machine learning model to measure the Norberg angle on canine hip radiographs increases accuracy and time to completion.","authors":"George C Hansen, Yuxiao Yao, Anthony J Fischetti, Anthony Gonzalez, Ian Porter, Rory J Todhunter, Youshan Zhang","doi":"10.2460/ajvr.25.02.0044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To apply machine learning (ML) to measure the Norberg angle (NA) on canine ventrodorsal hip-extended pelvic radiographs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this observational study, an NA-AI model was trained on real and synthetic radiographs. Additional radiographs were used for validation and testing. Each NA was predicted using a hybrid architecture derived from 2 ML vision models. The NAs were measured by 4 authors, and the model all were compared to each other. The time taken to correct the NAs predicted by the model was compared to unassisted human measurements.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The NA-AI model was trained on 733 real and 1,474 synthetic radiographs; 105 real radiographs were used for validation and 128 for testing. The mean absolute error between each human measurement ranged from 3° to 10° ± SD = 3° to 10° with an intraclass correlation between humans of 0.38 to 0.92. The mean absolute error between the NA-AI model prediction and the human measurements was 5° to 6° ± SD = 5° (intraclass correlation, 0.39 to 0.94). Bland-Altman plots showed good agreement between human and AI measurements when the NAs were greater than 80°. The time taken to check the accuracy of the NA measurement compared to unassisted measurements was reduced by 45% to 80%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The NA-AI model proved more accurate than the original model except when the hip dysplasia was severe, and its assistance decreased the time needed to analyze radiographs.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>The assistance of the NA-AI model reduces the time taken for radiographic hip analysis for clinical applications. However, it is less reliable in cases involving severe osteoarthritic change, requiring manual review for such cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":7754,"journal":{"name":"American journal of veterinary research","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of veterinary research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.25.02.0044","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To apply machine learning (ML) to measure the Norberg angle (NA) on canine ventrodorsal hip-extended pelvic radiographs.

Methods: In this observational study, an NA-AI model was trained on real and synthetic radiographs. Additional radiographs were used for validation and testing. Each NA was predicted using a hybrid architecture derived from 2 ML vision models. The NAs were measured by 4 authors, and the model all were compared to each other. The time taken to correct the NAs predicted by the model was compared to unassisted human measurements.

Results: The NA-AI model was trained on 733 real and 1,474 synthetic radiographs; 105 real radiographs were used for validation and 128 for testing. The mean absolute error between each human measurement ranged from 3° to 10° ± SD = 3° to 10° with an intraclass correlation between humans of 0.38 to 0.92. The mean absolute error between the NA-AI model prediction and the human measurements was 5° to 6° ± SD = 5° (intraclass correlation, 0.39 to 0.94). Bland-Altman plots showed good agreement between human and AI measurements when the NAs were greater than 80°. The time taken to check the accuracy of the NA measurement compared to unassisted measurements was reduced by 45% to 80%.

Conclusions: The NA-AI model proved more accurate than the original model except when the hip dysplasia was severe, and its assistance decreased the time needed to analyze radiographs.

Clinical relevance: The assistance of the NA-AI model reduces the time taken for radiographic hip analysis for clinical applications. However, it is less reliable in cases involving severe osteoarthritic change, requiring manual review for such cases.

下一代机器学习模型用于测量犬髋关节x线片上的Norberg角,提高了准确性和完成时间。
目的:应用机器学习(ML)技术测量犬髋部腹背侧骨盆x线片的Norberg角(NA)。方法:在本观察性研究中,对真实x线片和合成x线片进行NA-AI模型训练。额外的x线片用于验证和测试。每个NA使用来自2 ML视觉模型的混合架构进行预测。NAs由4位作者测量,并相互比较模型。修正由模型预测的NAs所需的时间与无辅助的人类测量结果进行了比较。结果:对733张真实x线片和1474张合成x线片进行了NA-AI模型训练;105张真实x光片用于验证,128张用于测试。每次人类测量的平均绝对误差范围为3°至10°±SD = 3°至10°,人类之间的类内相关性为0.38至0.92。NA-AI模型预测与人类测量值的平均绝对误差为5°~ 6°±SD = 5°(类内相关性为0.39 ~ 0.94)。Bland-Altman图显示,当na大于80°时,人类和人工智能的测量结果吻合良好。与无辅助测量相比,检查NA测量准确性所需的时间减少了45%至80%。结论:除了髋关节发育不良严重的情况外,NA-AI模型比原始模型更准确,并且它的辅助减少了分析x线片所需的时间。临床相关性:NA-AI模型的辅助减少了临床应用放射学髋关节分析所需的时间。然而,在涉及严重骨关节炎改变的病例中,它不太可靠,需要人工检查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
186
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Veterinary Research supports the collaborative exchange of information between researchers and clinicians by publishing novel research findings that bridge the gulf between basic research and clinical practice or that help to translate laboratory research and preclinical studies to the development of clinical trials and clinical practice. The journal welcomes submission of high-quality original studies and review articles in a wide range of scientific fields, including anatomy, anesthesiology, animal welfare, behavior, epidemiology, genetics, heredity, infectious disease, molecular biology, oncology, pharmacology, pathogenic mechanisms, physiology, surgery, theriogenology, toxicology, and vaccinology. Species of interest include production animals, companion animals, equids, exotic animals, birds, reptiles, and wild and marine animals. Reports of laboratory animal studies and studies involving the use of animals as experimental models of human diseases are considered only when the study results are of demonstrable benefit to the species used in the research or to another species of veterinary interest. Other fields of interest or animals species are not necessarily excluded from consideration, but such reports must focus on novel research findings. Submitted papers must make an original and substantial contribution to the veterinary medicine knowledge base; preliminary studies are not appropriate.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信