Kostyrka-Allchorne Katarzyna, Bourgaize Jake, Murray Aja, Stoilova Mariya, Abbas Iqra, Bridgwood Amy, Azeri Eliz, Hollis Chris, Townsend Ellen, Livingstone Sonia, Edmund J. S. Sonuga-Barke, the Digital Youth Research Programme
{"title":"Understanding Youth Online Experiences and Mental Health: Development and Validation of the Digital Activity and Feelings Inventory (DAFI)","authors":"Kostyrka-Allchorne Katarzyna, Bourgaize Jake, Murray Aja, Stoilova Mariya, Abbas Iqra, Bridgwood Amy, Azeri Eliz, Hollis Chris, Townsend Ellen, Livingstone Sonia, Edmund J. S. Sonuga-Barke, the Digital Youth Research Programme","doi":"10.1002/mpr.70028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>We created the Digital Activity and Feelings Inventory (DAFI) to measure youth digital activities and the psychological reactions they evoke, established its psychometric properties and tested its validity in predicting mental health relative to screen time estimates.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>An initial pool of items was generated using the existing research on youth digital activity and mental health and further refined via consultations with experts and young people (online youth panel sessions, <i>n</i> = 14). The participants (<i>n</i> = 383, mean age = 19 years) completed the resulting DAFI alongside established measures of depression, anxiety, wellbeing, and screen time. The DAFI factor structure, reliability and predictive validity were tested.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Exploratory factor analyses identified five digital activity subscales: <i>Risky Content</i>, <i>Risky Interactions</i>, <i>Social Comparison, Leisure Activities and Social Engagement</i> and three psychological reactions subscales: <i>Negative Self-Reactions, Negative Stress Reactions</i>, and <i>Positive Reactions</i>. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability were high. <i>Social Comparison</i> and <i>Negative Self-Reactions</i>, but not screen time, independently predicted depression and anxiety symptoms. <i>Positive Reactions</i>, lack of <i>Negative Self-Reactions</i>, lower screen time and <i>Social Engagement</i> predicted wellbeing.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The DAFI is a reliable measure of digital activities and associated psychological reactions and predicts youth mental health better than screen time.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50310,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research","volume":"34 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/mpr.70028","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mpr.70028","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives
We created the Digital Activity and Feelings Inventory (DAFI) to measure youth digital activities and the psychological reactions they evoke, established its psychometric properties and tested its validity in predicting mental health relative to screen time estimates.
Methods
An initial pool of items was generated using the existing research on youth digital activity and mental health and further refined via consultations with experts and young people (online youth panel sessions, n = 14). The participants (n = 383, mean age = 19 years) completed the resulting DAFI alongside established measures of depression, anxiety, wellbeing, and screen time. The DAFI factor structure, reliability and predictive validity were tested.
Results
Exploratory factor analyses identified five digital activity subscales: Risky Content, Risky Interactions, Social Comparison, Leisure Activities and Social Engagement and three psychological reactions subscales: Negative Self-Reactions, Negative Stress Reactions, and Positive Reactions. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability were high. Social Comparison and Negative Self-Reactions, but not screen time, independently predicted depression and anxiety symptoms. Positive Reactions, lack of Negative Self-Reactions, lower screen time and Social Engagement predicted wellbeing.
Conclusion
The DAFI is a reliable measure of digital activities and associated psychological reactions and predicts youth mental health better than screen time.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research (MPR) publishes high-standard original research of a technical, methodological, experimental and clinical nature, contributing to the theory, methodology, practice and evaluation of mental and behavioural disorders. The journal targets in particular detailed methodological and design papers from major national and international multicentre studies. There is a close working relationship with the US National Institute of Mental Health, the World Health Organisation (WHO) Diagnostic Instruments Committees, as well as several other European and international organisations.
MPR aims to publish rapidly articles of highest methodological quality in such areas as epidemiology, biostatistics, generics, psychopharmacology, psychology and the neurosciences. Articles informing about innovative and critical methodological, statistical and clinical issues, including nosology, can be submitted as regular papers and brief reports. Reviews are only occasionally accepted.
MPR seeks to monitor, discuss, influence and improve the standards of mental health and behavioral neuroscience research by providing a platform for rapid publication of outstanding contributions. As a quarterly journal MPR is a major source of information and ideas and is an important medium for students, clinicians and researchers in psychiatry, clinical psychology, epidemiology and the allied disciplines in the mental health field.