Evaluation of the Performance and Utility of Global Gridded Precipitation Products for Health Applications and Impact Assessments in South America

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Geohealth Pub Date : 2025-06-18 DOI:10.1029/2024GH001260
Sally Jahn, Katy A. M. Gaythorpe, Caroline M. Wainwright, Neil M. Ferguson
{"title":"Evaluation of the Performance and Utility of Global Gridded Precipitation Products for Health Applications and Impact Assessments in South America","authors":"Sally Jahn,&nbsp;Katy A. M. Gaythorpe,&nbsp;Caroline M. Wainwright,&nbsp;Neil M. Ferguson","doi":"10.1029/2024GH001260","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Globally gridded precipitation products (GGPPs) are commonly used in impact assessments as substitutes for weather station data, each with unique strengths and limitations. Reanalysis products are among the most widely used for driving impact models, evaluating climate models, or bias-correcting and downscaling model outputs to generate climate change projections. However, they are often outperformed in accuracy by other GGPPs, particularly in tropical regions, including areas of the Global South. Therefore, we assessed the utility and suitability of GGPPs for climate and health research by examining how differences and uncertainties in these products affect area-level precipitation estimates, often used in health studies when epidemiological data are linked to administrative units. We compared reanalysis (ERA5/-Land) with satellite-based (CHIRPS, PERSIANN-CDR) and interpolated gauge-based products (CRUTS, GPCC), each a viable candidate to serve as reference climatology in climate change impact assessments. We focused on seasonal patterns, disease-related bioclimatic variables, and climate change-relevant indices, such as the number of wet or dry periods. Our findings revealed substantial variation in the accuracy of local precipitation estimates across GGPPs, with differences in maximum pixel precipitation values exceeding 75% between ERA5-Land and CHIRPS. These differences in GGPPs translated into area-level precipitation and, consequently, in vector carrying capacity estimates, demonstrating their impact on health assessments. Our analysis focused on Brazil and Colombia, two diverse countries differing for example, in orography, climate, and size. Each product was evaluated against national station data. Our results indicate that estimating tropical precipitation is particularly challenging for reanalysis, while CHIRPS demonstrated the best overall performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":48618,"journal":{"name":"Geohealth","volume":"9 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024GH001260","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geohealth","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024GH001260","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Globally gridded precipitation products (GGPPs) are commonly used in impact assessments as substitutes for weather station data, each with unique strengths and limitations. Reanalysis products are among the most widely used for driving impact models, evaluating climate models, or bias-correcting and downscaling model outputs to generate climate change projections. However, they are often outperformed in accuracy by other GGPPs, particularly in tropical regions, including areas of the Global South. Therefore, we assessed the utility and suitability of GGPPs for climate and health research by examining how differences and uncertainties in these products affect area-level precipitation estimates, often used in health studies when epidemiological data are linked to administrative units. We compared reanalysis (ERA5/-Land) with satellite-based (CHIRPS, PERSIANN-CDR) and interpolated gauge-based products (CRUTS, GPCC), each a viable candidate to serve as reference climatology in climate change impact assessments. We focused on seasonal patterns, disease-related bioclimatic variables, and climate change-relevant indices, such as the number of wet or dry periods. Our findings revealed substantial variation in the accuracy of local precipitation estimates across GGPPs, with differences in maximum pixel precipitation values exceeding 75% between ERA5-Land and CHIRPS. These differences in GGPPs translated into area-level precipitation and, consequently, in vector carrying capacity estimates, demonstrating their impact on health assessments. Our analysis focused on Brazil and Colombia, two diverse countries differing for example, in orography, climate, and size. Each product was evaluated against national station data. Our results indicate that estimating tropical precipitation is particularly challenging for reanalysis, while CHIRPS demonstrated the best overall performance.

评估全球网格降水产品在南美洲的健康应用和影响评估的性能和效用
全球网格化降水产品(GGPPs)通常用于影响评估,作为气象站数据的替代品,每种产品都有其独特的优势和局限性。再分析产品是最广泛用于驱动影响模型、评估气候模型或偏差校正和缩小模型输出以生成气候变化预测的产品之一。然而,它们在准确性方面往往优于其他ggp,特别是在热带地区,包括全球南方地区。因此,我们评估了ggpp在气候和健康研究中的效用和适用性,方法是检查这些产品的差异和不确定性如何影响区域级降水估算,当流行病学数据与行政单位相关联时,通常用于健康研究。我们将再分析(ERA5/-Land)与基于卫星的(CHIRPS, PERSIANN-CDR)和插值的基于测量的产品(CRUTS, GPCC)进行了比较,每个产品都可以作为气候变化影响评估的参考气候学。我们关注季节模式、疾病相关的生物气候变量和气候变化相关指数,如湿润期或干旱期的数量。我们的研究结果表明,ggpp估算的本地降水精度存在很大差异,ERA5-Land和CHIRPS的最大像元降水值差异超过75%。ggpp的这些差异转化为区域级降水,从而转化为病媒承载能力估算,表明它们对健康评估的影响。我们的分析集中在巴西和哥伦比亚,这两个不同的国家在地形、气候和面积等方面都有所不同。每个产品都是根据国家气象站的数据进行评估的。我们的研究结果表明,估计热带降水对再分析尤其具有挑战性,而CHIRPS表现出最好的整体性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geohealth
Geohealth Environmental Science-Pollution
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
6.20%
发文量
124
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: GeoHealth will publish original research, reviews, policy discussions, and commentaries that cover the growing science on the interface among the Earth, atmospheric, oceans and environmental sciences, ecology, and the agricultural and health sciences. The journal will cover a wide variety of global and local issues including the impacts of climate change on human, agricultural, and ecosystem health, air and water pollution, environmental persistence of herbicides and pesticides, radiation and health, geomedicine, and the health effects of disasters. Many of these topics and others are of critical importance in the developing world and all require bringing together leading research across multiple disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信