Impact of Different Nitrogen Fertilizers on the Diversity and Abundance of Bacterial and Fungal Communities in Grassland Soils: The Emerging Case of Ammonium Sulfate and Sulfammox Process

IF 5.9 3区 工程技术 Q1 AGRONOMY
Bella Tsachidou, Magdalena Calusinska, Christophe Hissler, Jérôme Gennen, Benjamin Daigneux, Séverine Piutti, Alexandre Laflotte, Isabelle George, Philippe Delfosse
{"title":"Impact of Different Nitrogen Fertilizers on the Diversity and Abundance of Bacterial and Fungal Communities in Grassland Soils: The Emerging Case of Ammonium Sulfate and Sulfammox Process","authors":"Bella Tsachidou,&nbsp;Magdalena Calusinska,&nbsp;Christophe Hissler,&nbsp;Jérôme Gennen,&nbsp;Benjamin Daigneux,&nbsp;Séverine Piutti,&nbsp;Alexandre Laflotte,&nbsp;Isabelle George,&nbsp;Philippe Delfosse","doi":"10.1111/gcbb.70050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Improving agricultural productivity to meet the growing food and feed demand via nitrogen fertilization comes with trade-offs such as environmental pollution and biodiversity loss. Biogas residues (BRs) being a relatively new biofertilizer aiming at substituting chemical nitrogen fertilizers, have raised questions regarding their biosecurity and environmental footprint. In this study, we explored and compared the effect of repeated application of different nitrogen fertilizers on the bacterial and fungal α-diversity, relative abundance, β-diversity, and taxonomic composition in grassland soils over a period of two years. Given the paramount importance of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in sustainable agriculture and climate change, we examined the relative abundance of Glomeromycota and their response to the different nitrogen fertilizers. Finally, the soil microbial community was scanned for the most prominent pathogens that are often detected in BRs and are the main concern related to their application on agricultural soils. Microbial communities in the soil were identified and quantified via high-throughput sequencing of the 16S rDNA marker gene for bacteria, and the ribosomal DNA Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS2) region for fungi. Overall, the results suggest that the soil bacteriome is more sensitive than the mycobiome to nitrogen fertilization. Specifically, ammonium sulfate application appears to negatively impact bacterial alpha-diversity, while also altering the relative abundance of Glomeromycota, prompting us to question the potential involvement of the sulfammox process in the loss of soil microbial diversity. Notably, the application of biogas residues did not alter the diversity or abundance of soil microbial communities, nor harbored any significant pathogens; therefore, advocating for their safety and encouraging further research to validate their safe nature and beneficial properties.</p>","PeriodicalId":55126,"journal":{"name":"Global Change Biology Bioenergy","volume":"17 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gcbb.70050","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Change Biology Bioenergy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcbb.70050","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Improving agricultural productivity to meet the growing food and feed demand via nitrogen fertilization comes with trade-offs such as environmental pollution and biodiversity loss. Biogas residues (BRs) being a relatively new biofertilizer aiming at substituting chemical nitrogen fertilizers, have raised questions regarding their biosecurity and environmental footprint. In this study, we explored and compared the effect of repeated application of different nitrogen fertilizers on the bacterial and fungal α-diversity, relative abundance, β-diversity, and taxonomic composition in grassland soils over a period of two years. Given the paramount importance of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in sustainable agriculture and climate change, we examined the relative abundance of Glomeromycota and their response to the different nitrogen fertilizers. Finally, the soil microbial community was scanned for the most prominent pathogens that are often detected in BRs and are the main concern related to their application on agricultural soils. Microbial communities in the soil were identified and quantified via high-throughput sequencing of the 16S rDNA marker gene for bacteria, and the ribosomal DNA Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS2) region for fungi. Overall, the results suggest that the soil bacteriome is more sensitive than the mycobiome to nitrogen fertilization. Specifically, ammonium sulfate application appears to negatively impact bacterial alpha-diversity, while also altering the relative abundance of Glomeromycota, prompting us to question the potential involvement of the sulfammox process in the loss of soil microbial diversity. Notably, the application of biogas residues did not alter the diversity or abundance of soil microbial communities, nor harbored any significant pathogens; therefore, advocating for their safety and encouraging further research to validate their safe nature and beneficial properties.

Abstract Image

不同氮肥对草地土壤细菌和真菌群落多样性和丰度的影响——以硫酸铵和磺胺肟处理为例
通过氮肥提高农业生产力以满足日益增长的粮食和饲料需求,需要做出环境污染和生物多样性丧失等权衡。沼气渣作为一种以替代化学氮肥为目标的新型生物肥料,其生物安全性和环境足迹问题一直备受关注。本研究在2年的时间里,探讨并比较了不同氮肥重复施用对草地土壤细菌和真菌α-多样性、相对丰度、β-多样性和分类组成的影响。鉴于丛枝菌根真菌在可持续农业和气候变化中的重要作用,我们研究了丛枝菌根真菌的相对丰度及其对不同氮肥的响应。最后,对土壤微生物群落进行扫描,寻找BRs中经常检测到的最突出的病原体,这些病原体是与BRs在农业土壤上的应用相关的主要问题。通过对细菌的16S rDNA标记基因和真菌的核糖体DNA内转录间隔区(ITS2)进行高通量测序,对土壤中的微生物群落进行了鉴定和定量。综上所述,土壤细菌组比真菌组对施氮更为敏感。具体来说,硫酸铵的施用似乎对细菌的α多样性产生了负面影响,同时也改变了肾小球菌的相对丰度,这促使我们质疑磺胺肟过程可能参与土壤微生物多样性的丧失。值得注意的是,施用沼气渣没有改变土壤微生物群落的多样性或丰度,也没有任何重要的病原体;因此,提倡它们的安全性,并鼓励进一步研究以验证它们的安全性和有益特性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Change Biology Bioenergy
Global Change Biology Bioenergy AGRONOMY-ENERGY & FUELS
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
96
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: GCB Bioenergy is an international journal publishing original research papers, review articles and commentaries that promote understanding of the interface between biological and environmental sciences and the production of fuels directly from plants, algae and waste. The scope of the journal extends to areas outside of biology to policy forum, socioeconomic analyses, technoeconomic analyses and systems analysis. Papers do not need a global change component for consideration for publication, it is viewed as implicit that most bioenergy will be beneficial in avoiding at least a part of the fossil fuel energy that would otherwise be used. Key areas covered by the journal: Bioenergy feedstock and bio-oil production: energy crops and algae their management,, genomics, genetic improvements, planting, harvesting, storage, transportation, integrated logistics, production modeling, composition and its modification, pests, diseases and weeds of feedstocks. Manuscripts concerning alternative energy based on biological mimicry are also encouraged (e.g. artificial photosynthesis). Biological Residues/Co-products: from agricultural production, forestry and plantations (stover, sugar, bio-plastics, etc.), algae processing industries, and municipal sources (MSW). Bioenergy and the Environment: ecosystem services, carbon mitigation, land use change, life cycle assessment, energy and greenhouse gas balances, water use, water quality, assessment of sustainability, and biodiversity issues. Bioenergy Socioeconomics: examining the economic viability or social acceptability of crops, crops systems and their processing, including genetically modified organisms [GMOs], health impacts of bioenergy systems. Bioenergy Policy: legislative developments affecting biofuels and bioenergy. Bioenergy Systems Analysis: examining biological developments in a whole systems context.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信