Angle of progression as a potential risk factor for emergency cesarean section following induction of labor in Japanese nulliparous women at term

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Satoshi Shinohara, Rei Sunami, Genki Yasuda, Mayuko Kasai
{"title":"Angle of progression as a potential risk factor for emergency cesarean section following induction of labor in Japanese nulliparous women at term","authors":"Satoshi Shinohara,&nbsp;Rei Sunami,&nbsp;Genki Yasuda,&nbsp;Mayuko Kasai","doi":"10.1111/jog.16343","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>To examine the association between the angle of progression (AOP) measured before labor induction and the occurrence of emergency cesarean section (ECS). Additionally, a predictive model was developed for ECS following labor induction using sonographic and clinical data accessible to obstetricians.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This prospective observational cohort study was conducted at the Yamanashi Prefectural Central Hospital between January 2022 and July 2024. A total of 143 nulliparous Japanese women with singleton term pregnancies in the cephalic presentation were recruited. Transabdominal and transperineal ultrasound examinations were performed before labor induction. All variables with a <i>p</i>-value of &lt;0.05 in the bivariate analysis were evaluated using multivariable logistic regression analysis to examine the association between AOP and ECS and to identify AOP cutoff values predictive of ECS.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The incidence of ECS was 39.9% (57/143). Multivariable analysis indicated that the AOP (adjusted odds ratio [OR]: 0.89, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.85–0.94) and pre-pregnancy body mass index (adjusted OR: 1.14, 95% CI: 1.03–1.27) were associated with ECS. The prediction model had a sensitivity and specificity of 82.5% and 82.6%, respectively (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.88). The optimal AOP cutoff point for predicting ECS was 91.2° (AUC: 0.77).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The ECS prediction model incorporating AOP may facilitate individualized counseling before labor induction. Women with an AOP less than 91.2° are at an elevated risk for ECS.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16593,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research","volume":"51 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jog.16343","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

To examine the association between the angle of progression (AOP) measured before labor induction and the occurrence of emergency cesarean section (ECS). Additionally, a predictive model was developed for ECS following labor induction using sonographic and clinical data accessible to obstetricians.

Methods

This prospective observational cohort study was conducted at the Yamanashi Prefectural Central Hospital between January 2022 and July 2024. A total of 143 nulliparous Japanese women with singleton term pregnancies in the cephalic presentation were recruited. Transabdominal and transperineal ultrasound examinations were performed before labor induction. All variables with a p-value of <0.05 in the bivariate analysis were evaluated using multivariable logistic regression analysis to examine the association between AOP and ECS and to identify AOP cutoff values predictive of ECS.

Results

The incidence of ECS was 39.9% (57/143). Multivariable analysis indicated that the AOP (adjusted odds ratio [OR]: 0.89, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.85–0.94) and pre-pregnancy body mass index (adjusted OR: 1.14, 95% CI: 1.03–1.27) were associated with ECS. The prediction model had a sensitivity and specificity of 82.5% and 82.6%, respectively (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.88). The optimal AOP cutoff point for predicting ECS was 91.2° (AUC: 0.77).

Conclusion

The ECS prediction model incorporating AOP may facilitate individualized counseling before labor induction. Women with an AOP less than 91.2° are at an elevated risk for ECS.

进展角度是日本足月无产妇女引产后紧急剖宫产的潜在危险因素
目的探讨引产前产程角度(AOP)测量与急诊剖宫产(ECS)发生的关系。此外,利用超声和产科医生可获得的临床数据,开发了引产后ECS的预测模型。该前瞻性观察队列研究于2022年1月至2024年7月在山梨县中心医院进行。本研究共招募了143名头位单胎足月未生育的日本妇女。引产前行经腹部和经会阴超声检查。使用多变量logistic回归分析对双变量分析中p值为0.05的所有变量进行评估,以检验AOP与ECS之间的关联,并确定预测ECS的AOP截断值。结果ECS发生率为39.9%(57/143)。多变量分析表明,AOP(校正优势比[OR]: 0.89, 95%可信区间[CI]: 0.85-0.94)和孕前体重指数(校正优势比[OR]: 1.14, 95% CI: 1.03-1.27)与ECS相关。预测模型的敏感性和特异性分别为82.5%和82.6%(曲线下面积[AUC] = 0.88)。预测ECS的最佳AOP截止点为91.2°(AUC: 0.77)。结论结合AOP的ECS预测模型有助于引产前的个体化咨询。AOP小于91.2°的女性发生ECS的风险较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
376
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research is the official Journal of the Asia and Oceania Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology and of the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology, and aims to provide a medium for the publication of articles in the fields of obstetrics and gynecology. The Journal publishes original research articles, case reports, review articles and letters to the editor. The Journal will give publication priority to original research articles over case reports. Accepted papers become the exclusive licence of the Journal. Manuscripts are peer reviewed by at least two referees and/or Associate Editors expert in the field of the submitted paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信