Standardised Drone Procedures for Phytosociological Data Collection

IF 2 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY
Giacomo Quattrini, Simone Pesaresi, Lara Lucchetti, Nicole Hofmann, Felipe Saiter, Adriano Mancini, Simona Casavecchia
{"title":"Standardised Drone Procedures for Phytosociological Data Collection","authors":"Giacomo Quattrini,&nbsp;Simone Pesaresi,&nbsp;Lara Lucchetti,&nbsp;Nicole Hofmann,&nbsp;Felipe Saiter,&nbsp;Adriano Mancini,&nbsp;Simona Casavecchia","doi":"10.1111/avsc.70032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>Phytosociological maps are crucial for biodiversity conservation. Supervised mapping with machine learning demands high-quality reference data that field surveys alone cannot provide. This study evaluates drone-based procedures for phytosociological data collection, comparing them with field surveys. The research questions are as follows: Are species abundance data collected via drone surveys consistent with those obtained through traditional field phytosociological methods? Can plots be correctly assigned to known plant communities using drone data?</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Location</h3>\n \n <p>Marche, Central Italy.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Drone surveys were conducted over forest and grassland plots using tailored imaging protocols. Forest plots were captured at 14 m with 11 high-zoom images per plot, while grasslands were surveyed at 5 m with seven images per plot. The images were analysed to identify plant species and estimate their abundances, generating plot × species matrices. Multivariate analyses, including PCA, Mantel tests and supervised k-means classification, were used to compare drone data with those obtained from the field traditional method.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>PCA and Mantel test results (<i>r</i> = 0.782, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) demonstrated a strong relationship between species abundance data collected by drone and traditional field methods in both forest and grassland. The supervised classification achieved an overall accuracy exceeding 90% in assigning drone-surveyed plots to predefined plant associations.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>This study introduces the proposal of standardised drone procedures to assist botanists in collecting phytosociological data in sub-Mediterranean grasslands and forests. They can effectively complement and enhance the traditional Braun-Blanquet method, broadening its scope and efficiently performing tasks such as vegetation unit assignment and creating reference data useful for the continuous production of supervised phytosociological maps of vegetation and habitats, which are essential for environmental monitoring.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55494,"journal":{"name":"Applied Vegetation Science","volume":"28 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/avsc.70032","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Vegetation Science","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/avsc.70032","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims

Phytosociological maps are crucial for biodiversity conservation. Supervised mapping with machine learning demands high-quality reference data that field surveys alone cannot provide. This study evaluates drone-based procedures for phytosociological data collection, comparing them with field surveys. The research questions are as follows: Are species abundance data collected via drone surveys consistent with those obtained through traditional field phytosociological methods? Can plots be correctly assigned to known plant communities using drone data?

Location

Marche, Central Italy.

Methods

Drone surveys were conducted over forest and grassland plots using tailored imaging protocols. Forest plots were captured at 14 m with 11 high-zoom images per plot, while grasslands were surveyed at 5 m with seven images per plot. The images were analysed to identify plant species and estimate their abundances, generating plot × species matrices. Multivariate analyses, including PCA, Mantel tests and supervised k-means classification, were used to compare drone data with those obtained from the field traditional method.

Results

PCA and Mantel test results (r = 0.782, p < 0.001) demonstrated a strong relationship between species abundance data collected by drone and traditional field methods in both forest and grassland. The supervised classification achieved an overall accuracy exceeding 90% in assigning drone-surveyed plots to predefined plant associations.

Conclusions

This study introduces the proposal of standardised drone procedures to assist botanists in collecting phytosociological data in sub-Mediterranean grasslands and forests. They can effectively complement and enhance the traditional Braun-Blanquet method, broadening its scope and efficiently performing tasks such as vegetation unit assignment and creating reference data useful for the continuous production of supervised phytosociological maps of vegetation and habitats, which are essential for environmental monitoring.

植物社会学数据收集的标准化无人机程序
目的植物社会学地图对生物多样性保护具有重要意义。机器学习的监督测绘需要高质量的参考数据,仅靠实地调查是无法提供的。本研究评估了基于无人机的植物社会学数据收集程序,并将其与实地调查进行了比较。研究问题如下:通过无人机调查收集的物种丰度数据与通过传统的野外植物社会学方法获得的数据一致吗?是否可以使用无人机数据正确地将地块分配给已知的植物群落?地点:马尔凯,意大利中部。方法采用定制成像方案对森林和草地样地进行无人机调查。森林样地在14 m高度拍摄,每个样地高变焦图像11张;草地样地在5 m高度拍摄,每个样地高变焦图像7张。通过对图像进行分析,确定植物种类并估算其丰度,生成plot × species矩阵。使用多元分析,包括PCA、Mantel检验和监督k-means分类,将无人机数据与现场传统方法获得的数据进行比较。结果PCA和Mantel检验结果(r = 0.782, p < 0.001)表明,在森林和草地中,无人机采集的物种丰度数据与传统野外方法之间存在很强的相关性。在将无人机调查的地块分配给预定义的植物关联方面,监督分类的总体准确性超过90%。本研究提出了一种标准化的无人机程序,以帮助植物学家收集亚地中海草原和森林的植物社会学数据。它们可以有效地补充和增强传统的布朗-布兰凯方法,扩大其范围,并有效地执行植被单元分配和创建参考数据等任务,这些数据对环境监测必不可少的植被和生境的监督植物社会学图的连续制作有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Vegetation Science
Applied Vegetation Science 环境科学-林学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
10.70%
发文量
67
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Applied Vegetation Science focuses on community-level topics relevant to human interaction with vegetation, including global change, nature conservation, nature management, restoration of plant communities and of natural habitats, and the planning of semi-natural and urban landscapes. Vegetation survey, modelling and remote-sensing applications are welcome. Papers on vegetation science which do not fit to this scope (do not have an applied aspect and are not vegetation survey) should be directed to our associate journal, the Journal of Vegetation Science. Both journals publish papers on the ecology of a single species only if it plays a key role in structuring plant communities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信