Association Between Argatroban and Outcomes of Branch Atheromatous Disease: A Propensity-Matched Analysis From MRI-Based Study

IF 5 1区 医学 Q1 NEUROSCIENCES
Shengde Li, Haizhou Hu, Yaping Zhou, Ping Zhang, Guofang Chen, Hongying Bai, Bin Liu, Lixin Zhou, Yicheng Zhu, Bin Peng, Jun Ni, BAD-study investigators
{"title":"Association Between Argatroban and Outcomes of Branch Atheromatous Disease: A Propensity-Matched Analysis From MRI-Based Study","authors":"Shengde Li,&nbsp;Haizhou Hu,&nbsp;Yaping Zhou,&nbsp;Ping Zhang,&nbsp;Guofang Chen,&nbsp;Hongying Bai,&nbsp;Bin Liu,&nbsp;Lixin Zhou,&nbsp;Yicheng Zhu,&nbsp;Bin Peng,&nbsp;Jun Ni,&nbsp;BAD-study investigators","doi":"10.1111/cns.70467","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background and Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>Argatroban is widely used for patients with acute branch atheromatous disease (BAD)-related stroke, but its efficacy remains unclear. This study aims to evaluate its clinical outcomes in this patient population.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A prospective, MRI-based cohort (BAD-study) was conducted across 20 hospitals in China from June 2021 to June 2023, enrolling patients aged 18–80 years with BAD-related stroke within 72 h of onset. Patients were divided into two groups: Argatroban and non-argatroban. The primary outcome was an excellent outcome, defined as a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0–1 at 90 days. Secondary outcomes included good outcome (mRS 0–2), mRS score, Barthel Index score at 90 days, and NIHSS score at 7 days. Logistic regression analyses were performed to assess the association between argatroban and outcomes after propensity score matching (PSM).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 467 patients were included, with a median age of 60 years and a median NIHSS score of 4 at admission. Eighty-six patients (18.4%) were in the argatroban group, and 381 patients (81.6%) were in the non-argatroban group. After PSM, excellent outcomes occurred in 60.0% of the argatroban group and 64.2% of the non-argatroban group (odds ratio [OR] = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.47–1.49, <i>p</i> = 0.542). Argatroban was not significantly associated with secondary outcomes and remained ineffective in sensitivity analyses.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Argatroban was not associated with excellent outcome at 90 days in patients with acute BAD-related stroke. Our study suggests that the risks and benefits of argatroban need reevaluation in patients with BAD-related stroke.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":154,"journal":{"name":"CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics","volume":"31 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cns.70467","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cns.70467","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Purpose

Argatroban is widely used for patients with acute branch atheromatous disease (BAD)-related stroke, but its efficacy remains unclear. This study aims to evaluate its clinical outcomes in this patient population.

Methods

A prospective, MRI-based cohort (BAD-study) was conducted across 20 hospitals in China from June 2021 to June 2023, enrolling patients aged 18–80 years with BAD-related stroke within 72 h of onset. Patients were divided into two groups: Argatroban and non-argatroban. The primary outcome was an excellent outcome, defined as a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0–1 at 90 days. Secondary outcomes included good outcome (mRS 0–2), mRS score, Barthel Index score at 90 days, and NIHSS score at 7 days. Logistic regression analyses were performed to assess the association between argatroban and outcomes after propensity score matching (PSM).

Results

A total of 467 patients were included, with a median age of 60 years and a median NIHSS score of 4 at admission. Eighty-six patients (18.4%) were in the argatroban group, and 381 patients (81.6%) were in the non-argatroban group. After PSM, excellent outcomes occurred in 60.0% of the argatroban group and 64.2% of the non-argatroban group (odds ratio [OR] = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.47–1.49, p = 0.542). Argatroban was not significantly associated with secondary outcomes and remained ineffective in sensitivity analyses.

Conclusion

Argatroban was not associated with excellent outcome at 90 days in patients with acute BAD-related stroke. Our study suggests that the risks and benefits of argatroban need reevaluation in patients with BAD-related stroke.

Abstract Image

阿加曲班与分支动脉粥样硬化疾病结局之间的关系:基于mri的倾向匹配分析
背景与目的阿加曲班广泛用于急性分支动脉粥样硬化性疾病(BAD)相关脑卒中患者,但其疗效尚不清楚。本研究旨在评估其在该患者群体中的临床效果。方法于2021年6月至2023年6月在中国20家医院进行了一项基于mri的前瞻性队列研究(bad -based cohort, BAD-study),纳入了发病72小时内年龄在18-80岁之间的bad相关卒中患者。患者分为两组:阿加曲班和非阿加曲班。主要结局是一个极好的结局,定义为90天的修正Rankin量表(mRS)评分0-1。次要结局包括良好结局(mRS 0-2)、mRS评分、90天Barthel指数评分和7天NIHSS评分。采用Logistic回归分析评估阿加曲班与倾向评分匹配(PSM)后结果之间的关系。结果共纳入467例患者,入院时NIHSS评分中位数为4分,平均年龄为60岁。阿加曲班组86例(18.4%),非阿加曲班组381例(81.6%)。PSM后,60.0%的阿加曲班组和64.2%的非阿加曲班组的预后良好(优势比[OR] = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.47-1.49, p = 0.542)。阿加曲班与次要结果无显著相关性,在敏感性分析中仍然无效。结论阿加曲班与急性脑卒中患者90天预后无显著相关性。我们的研究表明,阿加曲班对bad相关脑卒中患者的风险和益处需要重新评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics
CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
12.70%
发文量
240
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics provides a medium for rapid publication of original clinical, experimental, and translational research papers, timely reviews and reports of novel findings of therapeutic relevance to the central nervous system, as well as papers related to clinical pharmacology, drug development and novel methodologies for drug evaluation. The journal focuses on neurological and psychiatric diseases such as stroke, Parkinson’s disease, Alzheimer’s disease, depression, schizophrenia, epilepsy, and drug abuse.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信