Acute Effects of Ammonia Nitrogen or Nitrite Nitrogen Exposure on Micropterus salmoides and the Post-Exposure Recovery

IF 1.9 Q3 FISHERIES
Zeguo Zeng, Shuifa Zhu, Fan Zhou, Jie Chen, Xiaoming Shen, Wei Liu, Xiaofeng Zhang, Gaohua Yao
{"title":"Acute Effects of Ammonia Nitrogen or Nitrite Nitrogen Exposure on Micropterus salmoides and the Post-Exposure Recovery","authors":"Zeguo Zeng,&nbsp;Shuifa Zhu,&nbsp;Fan Zhou,&nbsp;Jie Chen,&nbsp;Xiaoming Shen,&nbsp;Wei Liu,&nbsp;Xiaofeng Zhang,&nbsp;Gaohua Yao","doi":"10.1002/aff2.70085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>To provide guidance for the actual cultivation of <i>Micropterus salmoides</i>, the effects of ammonia-nitrogen (ammonia-N) or nitrite nitrogen (nitrite-N) stress on enzymatic activity, tissue structure and gut microbiota were investigated. The experimental groups consisted of Group 1 (control group), Group 2 (ammonia-N stress group), Group 3 (ammonia-N stress recovery group), Group 4 (nitrite-N stress group) and Group 5 (nitrite-N stress recovery group). In these groups, the LC50 of ammonia-N and nitrite-N were measured over 96 h. The superoxide dismutase (SOD), acid phosphatase (ACP) and alkaline phosphatase (AKP) activities in the experimental groups showed a trend of first increasing and then decreasing. The SOD activity of Groups 1, 3 and 5 was significantly higher than that of Group 2 at 192 h, whereas the malondialdehyde (MDA) index was significantly lower than that of Groups 2 and 4. The ACP and AKP activities of Groups 1, 3 and 5 were significantly higher than those of Groups 2 and 4 at 192 h. Histology observation revealed the liver cells gradually worsened with increasing duration of stress; Groups 3 and 5 were less severe than Groups 2 and 4. The gills were similar to those of the liver. After ammonia-N stress, Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria and <i>Candidatus Bacilloplasma</i> decreased, whereas Fusobacteriota, <i>Mycoplasma</i> and <i>Cetobacterium</i> increased. After nitrite-N stress, Firmicutes, Actinobacteria and <i>Candidatus Bacilloplasma</i> decreased, whereas Fusobacteriota, <i>Aeromonas</i>, <i>Cetobacterium</i> and <i>Mycoplasma</i> increased. During recovery period, Fusobacteriota, <i>Cetobacterium</i> and <i>Mycoplasma</i> continued to increase. The microbial diversity of Groups 3 and 5 was higher than that of Groups 2 and 4. In conclusion, 50 mg/L ammonia-N or 45 mg/L nitrite-N caused changes in enzyme activity, damage to the liver and gills and alterations in the gut microbiota. Besides, the physiological condition of <i>M. salmoides</i> did improve after recovery but did not return to the pre-stress state.</p>","PeriodicalId":100114,"journal":{"name":"Aquaculture, Fish and Fisheries","volume":"5 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/aff2.70085","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aquaculture, Fish and Fisheries","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aff2.70085","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To provide guidance for the actual cultivation of Micropterus salmoides, the effects of ammonia-nitrogen (ammonia-N) or nitrite nitrogen (nitrite-N) stress on enzymatic activity, tissue structure and gut microbiota were investigated. The experimental groups consisted of Group 1 (control group), Group 2 (ammonia-N stress group), Group 3 (ammonia-N stress recovery group), Group 4 (nitrite-N stress group) and Group 5 (nitrite-N stress recovery group). In these groups, the LC50 of ammonia-N and nitrite-N were measured over 96 h. The superoxide dismutase (SOD), acid phosphatase (ACP) and alkaline phosphatase (AKP) activities in the experimental groups showed a trend of first increasing and then decreasing. The SOD activity of Groups 1, 3 and 5 was significantly higher than that of Group 2 at 192 h, whereas the malondialdehyde (MDA) index was significantly lower than that of Groups 2 and 4. The ACP and AKP activities of Groups 1, 3 and 5 were significantly higher than those of Groups 2 and 4 at 192 h. Histology observation revealed the liver cells gradually worsened with increasing duration of stress; Groups 3 and 5 were less severe than Groups 2 and 4. The gills were similar to those of the liver. After ammonia-N stress, Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria and Candidatus Bacilloplasma decreased, whereas Fusobacteriota, Mycoplasma and Cetobacterium increased. After nitrite-N stress, Firmicutes, Actinobacteria and Candidatus Bacilloplasma decreased, whereas Fusobacteriota, Aeromonas, Cetobacterium and Mycoplasma increased. During recovery period, Fusobacteriota, Cetobacterium and Mycoplasma continued to increase. The microbial diversity of Groups 3 and 5 was higher than that of Groups 2 and 4. In conclusion, 50 mg/L ammonia-N or 45 mg/L nitrite-N caused changes in enzyme activity, damage to the liver and gills and alterations in the gut microbiota. Besides, the physiological condition of M. salmoides did improve after recovery but did not return to the pre-stress state.

Abstract Image

氨氮或亚硝酸盐氮暴露对沙尾小腹的急性影响及暴露后的恢复
为了给实际养殖提供指导,研究了氨氮(氨氮-n)或亚硝酸盐氮(亚硝酸盐-n)胁迫对沙颡鱼酶活性、组织结构和肠道菌群的影响。试验组分为1组(对照组)、2组(氨氮应激组)、3组(氨氮应激恢复组)、4组(亚硝酸盐-氮应激组)和5组(亚硝酸盐-氮应激恢复组)。在96 h内测定氨氮和亚硝酸盐氮的LC50值。各试验组超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)、酸性磷酸酶(ACP)和碱性磷酸酶(AKP)活性均呈现先升高后降低的趋势。192 h时,1、3、5组SOD活性显著高于2组,MDA指数显著低于2、4组。在192 h时,1、3、5组的ACP和AKP活性显著高于2、4组。组织学观察显示,随着应激时间的延长,肝细胞逐渐恶化;第3组和第5组的病情较第2组和第4组轻。鳃与肝脏的鳃相似。氨氮胁迫后,变形杆菌、放线菌和芽孢杆菌减少,而梭杆菌、支原体和鲸杆菌增加。亚硝酸盐- n胁迫后,厚壁菌门、放线菌门、芽孢杆菌门数量减少,梭杆菌门、气单胞菌门、鲸杆菌门、支原体门数量增加。恢复期梭杆菌、鲸杆菌和支原体继续增多。3、5组的微生物多样性高于2、4组。综上所述,50 mg/L氨氮或45 mg/L亚硝酸盐氮均可引起酶活性的变化、肝脏和鳃的损伤以及肠道菌群的改变。此外,恢复后沙门草的生理状况有所改善,但没有恢复到胁迫前的状态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信