Quantification of Ozone Exposure Impacts and Their Uncertainties on Growth and Survival of 88 Tree Species Across the United States

IF 3.4 2区 地球科学 Q2 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
Nathan R. Pavlovic, Shih Ying Chang, Kenneth J. Craig, Charles R. Scarborough, Justin G. Coughlin, Jeffrey D. Herrick, Charles T. Driscoll
{"title":"Quantification of Ozone Exposure Impacts and Their Uncertainties on Growth and Survival of 88 Tree Species Across the United States","authors":"Nathan R. Pavlovic,&nbsp;Shih Ying Chang,&nbsp;Kenneth J. Craig,&nbsp;Charles R. Scarborough,&nbsp;Justin G. Coughlin,&nbsp;Jeffrey D. Herrick,&nbsp;Charles T. Driscoll","doi":"10.1029/2024JD042063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Exposure to ambient ozone (O<sub>3</sub>) impacts vegetation through cascading effects. Numerous tree species experience biomass loss and increased mortality following O<sub>3</sub> exposure. Quantifying levels of O<sub>3</sub> at which deleterious impacts occur to individual trees under in situ conditions is essential for the effective management of air and forest resources. Previously, O<sub>3</sub> critical levels (CLs) were established based on controlled seedling experiments. However, seedling experiments may fail to reflect O<sub>3</sub> impacts on mature trees. In this study, we report the first results for empirically derived, species-specific O<sub>3</sub> CLs for tree growth and survival using a database of ∼1.5 million trees observed over time across the conterminous United States. Using a machine learning approach, we calculated O<sub>3</sub> CLs for 88 tree species (growth: 72 species; survival: 51 species). To our knowledge, most tree species we assessed have no prior determination of O<sub>3</sub> CLs. Estimated O<sub>3</sub> CLs (W126) for 5% decline in the tree growth rate ranged from 1.9 to 37.6 ppm-hr (mean: 10.5 ppm-hr), and estimated O<sub>3</sub> CLs for 1% tree survival probability decline ranged from 1.9 to 37.9 ppm-hr (mean: 9.3 ppm-hr) across species. Recently (2016–2018), portions of the western United States exceeded O<sub>3</sub> CLs for nearly all tree species for both growth and survival. Nationally, O<sub>3</sub> exposure levels were below the growth CLs for most species, while levels may have exceeded the survival CLs for some species. Our results provide new evidence of the range and uncertainty of impacts of ozone exposure on trees across the United States.</p>","PeriodicalId":15986,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres","volume":"130 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024JD042063","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Exposure to ambient ozone (O3) impacts vegetation through cascading effects. Numerous tree species experience biomass loss and increased mortality following O3 exposure. Quantifying levels of O3 at which deleterious impacts occur to individual trees under in situ conditions is essential for the effective management of air and forest resources. Previously, O3 critical levels (CLs) were established based on controlled seedling experiments. However, seedling experiments may fail to reflect O3 impacts on mature trees. In this study, we report the first results for empirically derived, species-specific O3 CLs for tree growth and survival using a database of ∼1.5 million trees observed over time across the conterminous United States. Using a machine learning approach, we calculated O3 CLs for 88 tree species (growth: 72 species; survival: 51 species). To our knowledge, most tree species we assessed have no prior determination of O3 CLs. Estimated O3 CLs (W126) for 5% decline in the tree growth rate ranged from 1.9 to 37.6 ppm-hr (mean: 10.5 ppm-hr), and estimated O3 CLs for 1% tree survival probability decline ranged from 1.9 to 37.9 ppm-hr (mean: 9.3 ppm-hr) across species. Recently (2016–2018), portions of the western United States exceeded O3 CLs for nearly all tree species for both growth and survival. Nationally, O3 exposure levels were below the growth CLs for most species, while levels may have exceeded the survival CLs for some species. Our results provide new evidence of the range and uncertainty of impacts of ozone exposure on trees across the United States.

臭氧暴露对美国88种树种生长和存活影响的量化及其不确定性
暴露于环境臭氧(O3)通过级联效应影响植被。许多树种在暴露于臭氧后经历生物量损失和死亡率增加。量化在原地条件下对单个树木产生有害影响的臭氧水平对于有效管理空气和森林资源至关重要。以往的O3临界水平(CLs)是在对照苗期试验的基础上确定的。然而,幼苗试验可能无法反映O3对成熟树木的影响。在这项研究中,我们报告了经验推导的第一个结果,物种特异性的O3 CLs用于树木的生长和生存,使用了一个在美国相邻地区观察到的150万棵树的数据库。使用机器学习方法,我们计算了88种树种的O3 CLs(生长:72种;生存:51种)。据我们所知,我们评估的大多数树种没有事先测定O3 CLs。树木生长率下降5%的O3 CLs (W126)估计范围为1.9至37.6 ppm-hr(平均值:10.5 ppm-hr),树木生存概率下降1%的O3 CLs估计范围为1.9至37.9 ppm-hr(平均值:9.3 ppm-hr)。最近(2016-2018),美国西部部分地区几乎所有树种的生长和生存都超过了O3 CLs。在全国范围内,大多数物种的臭氧暴露水平低于生长极限,而某些物种的臭氧暴露水平可能超过生存极限。我们的研究结果为臭氧暴露对美国树木影响的范围和不确定性提供了新的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres Earth and Planetary Sciences-Geophysics
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
11.40%
发文量
684
期刊介绍: JGR: Atmospheres publishes articles that advance and improve understanding of atmospheric properties and processes, including the interaction of the atmosphere with other components of the Earth system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信