The Application of Augmented Reality Technology in Free Flap Reconstruction: A Systematic Review

IF 1.5 3区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Microsurgery Pub Date : 2025-06-17 DOI:10.1002/micr.70080
Thao T. Wolbert, Anna E. White, Joohee Han, Shalmali Mirajkar, John A. Van Aalst, Perry J. Johnson, Shannon L. Wong, Sean C. Figy
{"title":"The Application of Augmented Reality Technology in Free Flap Reconstruction: A Systematic Review","authors":"Thao T. Wolbert,&nbsp;Anna E. White,&nbsp;Joohee Han,&nbsp;Shalmali Mirajkar,&nbsp;John A. Van Aalst,&nbsp;Perry J. Johnson,&nbsp;Shannon L. Wong,&nbsp;Sean C. Figy","doi":"10.1002/micr.70080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Augmented reality (AR) is an emerging technology in microsurgery for free flap reconstruction. AR allows surgeons to superimpose preoperative CT images onto the patient, providing real-time insight into the underlying anatomy and aiding in the decision-making process; however, there is limited empirical evidence supporting the effectiveness of this modality. We conducted a systematic review to investigate whether the use of AR devices in free flap reconstruction correlates with improved outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, and Scopus was performed on February 19, 2025. Our search included retrospective and prospective articles that demonstrated the use of AR technology intraoperatively and reported surgical outcomes in any type of free flap reconstruction. The initial search yielded 158 articles, with 8 ultimately included in the study. Articles were reviewed for technical accuracy, surgeon ease of use, operative time, complications, and operative costs.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>AR can guide surgeons, particularly those with less experience. As surgeons gain a better understanding of perforator locations, they operate with increased confidence and efficiency. AR outperformed Doppler ultrasound in perforator identification, demonstrating higher accuracy during flap planning and dissection. The time required to harvest flaps was significantly shorter when AR was used compared to traditional flap dissection techniques. Compared to computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) navigation systems, AR surgical guidance exhibited greater accuracy and required significantly less time for flap design. AR devices surpassed cutting guides in various aspects, including cost savings, reduced preparation time, increased flexibility in surgical plan modification, intraoperative tissue drift, and a more favorable effect on hand-eye coordination. No conclusive postoperative complications were reported.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The majority of the literature about AR in free flap surgery comes from small clinical studies. Widescale, multi-center studies are necessary to determine the true clinical impact of AR technology in microsurgery.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":18600,"journal":{"name":"Microsurgery","volume":"45 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microsurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/micr.70080","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Augmented reality (AR) is an emerging technology in microsurgery for free flap reconstruction. AR allows surgeons to superimpose preoperative CT images onto the patient, providing real-time insight into the underlying anatomy and aiding in the decision-making process; however, there is limited empirical evidence supporting the effectiveness of this modality. We conducted a systematic review to investigate whether the use of AR devices in free flap reconstruction correlates with improved outcomes.

Methods

A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, and Scopus was performed on February 19, 2025. Our search included retrospective and prospective articles that demonstrated the use of AR technology intraoperatively and reported surgical outcomes in any type of free flap reconstruction. The initial search yielded 158 articles, with 8 ultimately included in the study. Articles were reviewed for technical accuracy, surgeon ease of use, operative time, complications, and operative costs.

Results

AR can guide surgeons, particularly those with less experience. As surgeons gain a better understanding of perforator locations, they operate with increased confidence and efficiency. AR outperformed Doppler ultrasound in perforator identification, demonstrating higher accuracy during flap planning and dissection. The time required to harvest flaps was significantly shorter when AR was used compared to traditional flap dissection techniques. Compared to computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) navigation systems, AR surgical guidance exhibited greater accuracy and required significantly less time for flap design. AR devices surpassed cutting guides in various aspects, including cost savings, reduced preparation time, increased flexibility in surgical plan modification, intraoperative tissue drift, and a more favorable effect on hand-eye coordination. No conclusive postoperative complications were reported.

Conclusion

The majority of the literature about AR in free flap surgery comes from small clinical studies. Widescale, multi-center studies are necessary to determine the true clinical impact of AR technology in microsurgery.

增强现实技术在自由皮瓣重建中的应用综述
增强现实(AR)技术是显微外科自由皮瓣重建的新兴技术。增强现实允许外科医生将术前CT图像叠加到患者身上,提供对潜在解剖结构的实时洞察,并帮助决策过程;然而,支持这种方式有效性的经验证据有限。我们进行了一项系统综述,以调查在自由皮瓣重建中使用AR设备是否与改善的结果相关。方法于2025年2月19日综合检索PubMed、Embase、Scopus。我们的搜索包括回顾性和前瞻性的文章,这些文章展示了术中AR技术的使用,并报道了任何类型的游离皮瓣重建的手术结果。最初的搜索产生了158篇文章,其中8篇最终被纳入了研究。文章回顾了技术准确性,外科医生的易用性,手术时间,并发症和手术费用。结果增强现实技术可以指导外科医生,特别是经验不足的外科医生。随着外科医生对穿支位置的了解越来越深入,他们的手术信心和效率也越来越高。AR在穿支识别方面优于多普勒超声,在皮瓣规划和剥离方面具有更高的准确性。与传统的皮瓣剥离技术相比,使用AR获取皮瓣所需的时间明显缩短。与计算机辅助设计和计算机辅助制造(CAD/CAM)导航系统相比,AR手术引导具有更高的准确性,并且需要更少的皮瓣设计时间。AR设备在成本节约、准备时间缩短、手术方案修改灵活性增加、术中组织漂移、手眼协调效果更佳等方面均优于切割导轨。无结论性术后并发症报道。结论关于游离皮瓣手术中AR的文献大多来自于小规模的临床研究。为了确定AR技术在显微外科手术中的真正临床影响,需要进行大规模、多中心的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Microsurgery
Microsurgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
19.00%
发文量
128
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Microsurgery is an international and interdisciplinary publication of original contributions concerning surgery under microscopic magnification. Microsurgery publishes clinical studies, research papers, invited articles, relevant reviews, and other scholarly works from all related fields including orthopaedic surgery, otolaryngology, pediatric surgery, plastic surgery, urology, and vascular surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信