Denise Azar, Sofia Wang, Liz Flemming-Judge, Anna Wong Shee, Rebecca Jessup, Laveena Sharma, Shihoko Fukumori, Jason Talevski, Stephen J. Nicholls, James Harris, Laura Alston, Catherine Martin, Ernesto Oqueli, William van Gaal, Alison Beauchamp
{"title":"Using Codesign to Develop a Health Literacy Intervention to Improve the Accessibility and Acceptability of Cardiac Services: The Equal Hearts Study","authors":"Denise Azar, Sofia Wang, Liz Flemming-Judge, Anna Wong Shee, Rebecca Jessup, Laveena Sharma, Shihoko Fukumori, Jason Talevski, Stephen J. Nicholls, James Harris, Laura Alston, Catherine Martin, Ernesto Oqueli, William van Gaal, Alison Beauchamp","doi":"10.1111/hex.70328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>The burden of coronary heart disease (CHD) is disproportionately greater among socio-economically disadvantaged groups. Health services play a crucial role in addressing this social gradient by ensuring equitable access to care. However, there is limited evidence on effective strategies to improve health service accessibility for CHD patients, particularly those that are codesigned with people with lived experience and clinicians. The Equal Hearts study aimed to codesign a health literacy-based intervention to improve the accessibility of hospital-based cardiac services for underserved population groups with CHD.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This study employed a mixed-methods approach based on codesign principles. The study comprises three phases: identifying and understanding the problem, codeveloping an intervention, and translating the intervention into practice. Phases 1 and 2 are reported in this paper and included focus groups, interviews and an intervention development workshop. Participants for focus groups and interviews were recruited from four health services in [Victoria] and included patients with CHD, health consumers from culturally diverse communities and clinicians. Findings from focus groups and interviews were analysed via thematic analysis using Levesque's conceptual framework to identify health literacy barriers to accessibility of cardiac services. These barriers were prioritised in a codesign workshop with cardiac patients, health consumers and clinicians.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Thirty-seven cardiac patients, 10 clinicians and 44 culturally diverse health consumers participated in focus groups/interviews. Among these participants, eight cardiac patients/carers and five clinicians attended the workshop. Cardiac patients reported a lack of preparedness for hospital discharge and feeling ‘lost’ and uncertain about how to confidently manage their health at home after a cardiac event. A codesigned intervention—The Patient Discharge Action Plan—aims to improve patients' transition from hospital to home.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Using a codesign approach and health literacy principles, a health service intervention was developed to improve accessibility of cardiac services. The Patient Discharge Action Plan is currently being evaluated in a pilot RCT.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Patient or Public Contribution</h3>\n \n <p>Two consumer co-authors [L.F.J. and J.H.] informed the development of the study protocol. A Stakeholder Advisory Panel, including six people with lived experience of CHD and four clinicians/health service managers from participating sites, guided all steps within this study.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Trial Registration</h3>\n \n <p>ACTRN12624000780550p (Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry). Registered on 25 June 2024.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55070,"journal":{"name":"Health Expectations","volume":"28 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/hex.70328","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Expectations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hex.70328","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
The burden of coronary heart disease (CHD) is disproportionately greater among socio-economically disadvantaged groups. Health services play a crucial role in addressing this social gradient by ensuring equitable access to care. However, there is limited evidence on effective strategies to improve health service accessibility for CHD patients, particularly those that are codesigned with people with lived experience and clinicians. The Equal Hearts study aimed to codesign a health literacy-based intervention to improve the accessibility of hospital-based cardiac services for underserved population groups with CHD.
Methods
This study employed a mixed-methods approach based on codesign principles. The study comprises three phases: identifying and understanding the problem, codeveloping an intervention, and translating the intervention into practice. Phases 1 and 2 are reported in this paper and included focus groups, interviews and an intervention development workshop. Participants for focus groups and interviews were recruited from four health services in [Victoria] and included patients with CHD, health consumers from culturally diverse communities and clinicians. Findings from focus groups and interviews were analysed via thematic analysis using Levesque's conceptual framework to identify health literacy barriers to accessibility of cardiac services. These barriers were prioritised in a codesign workshop with cardiac patients, health consumers and clinicians.
Results
Thirty-seven cardiac patients, 10 clinicians and 44 culturally diverse health consumers participated in focus groups/interviews. Among these participants, eight cardiac patients/carers and five clinicians attended the workshop. Cardiac patients reported a lack of preparedness for hospital discharge and feeling ‘lost’ and uncertain about how to confidently manage their health at home after a cardiac event. A codesigned intervention—The Patient Discharge Action Plan—aims to improve patients' transition from hospital to home.
Conclusion
Using a codesign approach and health literacy principles, a health service intervention was developed to improve accessibility of cardiac services. The Patient Discharge Action Plan is currently being evaluated in a pilot RCT.
Patient or Public Contribution
Two consumer co-authors [L.F.J. and J.H.] informed the development of the study protocol. A Stakeholder Advisory Panel, including six people with lived experience of CHD and four clinicians/health service managers from participating sites, guided all steps within this study.
Trial Registration
ACTRN12624000780550p (Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry). Registered on 25 June 2024.
期刊介绍:
Health Expectations promotes critical thinking and informed debate about all aspects of patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) in health and social care, health policy and health services research including:
• Person-centred care and quality improvement
• Patients'' participation in decisions about disease prevention and management
• Public perceptions of health services
• Citizen involvement in health care policy making and priority-setting
• Methods for monitoring and evaluating participation
• Empowerment and consumerism
• Patients'' role in safety and quality
• Patient and public role in health services research
• Co-production (researchers working with patients and the public) of research, health care and policy
Health Expectations is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal publishing original research, review articles and critical commentaries. It includes papers which clarify concepts, develop theories, and critically analyse and evaluate specific policies and practices. The Journal provides an inter-disciplinary and international forum in which researchers (including PPIE researchers) from a range of backgrounds and expertise can present their work to other researchers, policy-makers, health care professionals, managers, patients and consumer advocates.