Ventilatory Thresholds Differences According to Aerobic Fitness Level in 1450 Males and 241 Females on Cycle-Ergometer: A Cross-Sectional Study

José Antonio Benítez-Muñoz, María Alcocer-Ayuga, Rocío Cupeiro, Isabel Guisado-Cuadrado, Miguel Ángel Rojo-Tirado, Víctor M. Alfaro-Magallanes, Nuria Romero-Parra, Eliane Aparecida-Castro, Domingo J. Ramos-Campo, Alberto Armero-Sotillo, Ana Belén Peinado, Pedro J. Benito
{"title":"Ventilatory Thresholds Differences According to Aerobic Fitness Level in 1450 Males and 241 Females on Cycle-Ergometer: A Cross-Sectional Study","authors":"José Antonio Benítez-Muñoz,&nbsp;María Alcocer-Ayuga,&nbsp;Rocío Cupeiro,&nbsp;Isabel Guisado-Cuadrado,&nbsp;Miguel Ángel Rojo-Tirado,&nbsp;Víctor M. Alfaro-Magallanes,&nbsp;Nuria Romero-Parra,&nbsp;Eliane Aparecida-Castro,&nbsp;Domingo J. Ramos-Campo,&nbsp;Alberto Armero-Sotillo,&nbsp;Ana Belén Peinado,&nbsp;Pedro J. Benito","doi":"10.1002/ejsc.12323","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <p>The aim of the study was to analyze the influence of an aerobic fitness level on the percentage of maximum oxygen consumption, heart rate, and power output (%VO<sub>2max</sub>, %HR<sub>max</sub>, and %<i>W</i><sub>max</sub>) at which ventilatory thresholds 1 (VT1) and 2 (VT2) occur during a ramp incremental cycle-ergometer test in males and females considering age. 1450 males and 241 females performed a ramp incremental exercise test until exhaustion to determine VT1, VT2, and VO<sub>2max</sub>. Combining the oxygen consumption at VT1, VT2, and VO<sub>2max</sub> by clustering analysis, males were classified as a low, medium, or high aerobic fitness level and females were classified as a low or high aerobic fitness level. Results showed VO<sub>2max</sub> was very poorly correlated with the %VO<sub>2max</sub> at which VT1 and VT2 occur (<i>r</i> ≤ 0.115), whereas oxygen consumption at VT1 and VT2 showed a stronger positive association with the %VO<sub>2max</sub> at which VT1 and VT2 occur, respectively (<i>r</i> = 0.357–0.604). Furthermore, the %VO<sub>2max</sub> at which VT1 and VT2 occur were greater the higher the aerobic fitness level (all <i>p</i> ≤ 0.002), observing a high heterogeneity in the %VO<sub>2max</sub> at which VT1 and VT2 occur even stratifying the sample by sex and aerobic fitness levels. In conclusion, the percentage of maximum at which VT1 and VT2 occur are better related to oxygen consumption at VT1 and VT2, respectively, than to VO<sub>2max</sub>. Moreover, the common strategy consisting of establishing exercise intensity as a fixed percentage of maximum might not be effective to match intensity across individuals even if sex and aerobic fitness levels is considered.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Trial Registration</h3>\n \n <p>NCT06246760.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":93999,"journal":{"name":"European journal of sport science","volume":"25 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ejsc.12323","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of sport science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ejsc.12323","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of the study was to analyze the influence of an aerobic fitness level on the percentage of maximum oxygen consumption, heart rate, and power output (%VO2max, %HRmax, and %Wmax) at which ventilatory thresholds 1 (VT1) and 2 (VT2) occur during a ramp incremental cycle-ergometer test in males and females considering age. 1450 males and 241 females performed a ramp incremental exercise test until exhaustion to determine VT1, VT2, and VO2max. Combining the oxygen consumption at VT1, VT2, and VO2max by clustering analysis, males were classified as a low, medium, or high aerobic fitness level and females were classified as a low or high aerobic fitness level. Results showed VO2max was very poorly correlated with the %VO2max at which VT1 and VT2 occur (r ≤ 0.115), whereas oxygen consumption at VT1 and VT2 showed a stronger positive association with the %VO2max at which VT1 and VT2 occur, respectively (r = 0.357–0.604). Furthermore, the %VO2max at which VT1 and VT2 occur were greater the higher the aerobic fitness level (all p ≤ 0.002), observing a high heterogeneity in the %VO2max at which VT1 and VT2 occur even stratifying the sample by sex and aerobic fitness levels. In conclusion, the percentage of maximum at which VT1 and VT2 occur are better related to oxygen consumption at VT1 and VT2, respectively, than to VO2max. Moreover, the common strategy consisting of establishing exercise intensity as a fixed percentage of maximum might not be effective to match intensity across individuals even if sex and aerobic fitness levels is considered.

Trial Registration

NCT06246760.

1450名男性和241名女性在有氧健身水平上的通气阈值差异:一项横断面研究
该研究的目的是分析有氧健身水平对考虑年龄的男性和女性坡道增量周期-体能计测试中最大耗氧量百分比、心率和功率输出(%VO2max、%HRmax和%Wmax)的影响,其中通气阈值1 (VT1)和2 (VT2)发生。1450名男性和241名女性进行了坡道增量运动试验,直到精疲力竭,以确定VT1, VT2和VO2max。通过聚类分析,结合VT1、VT2和VO2max耗氧量,将男性分为低、中、高有氧适应度,将女性分为低、高有氧适应度。结果表明,VO2max与VT1和VT2发生时的VO2max百分比相关性极低(r≤0.115),而VT1和VT2的耗氧量分别与VT1和VT2发生时的VO2max百分比呈较强的正相关(r = 0.357-0.604)。此外,VT1和VT2发生时的VO2max百分比随有氧适能水平的提高而增加(p均≤0.002),即使按性别和有氧适能水平分层,VT1和VT2发生时的VO2max百分比也存在高度异质性。综上所述,VT1和VT2的最大耗氧量百分比分别与VT1和VT2的耗氧量有关,而不是与VO2max有关。此外,即使考虑到性别和有氧健康水平,将运动强度确定为最大运动强度的固定百分比的常见策略也可能无法有效地匹配个体之间的强度。试验注册编号NCT06246760。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信