{"title":"Measurement of gas dispersion parameters in a reflux flotation cell","authors":"Abdullaziz Glabe Zakari, Raju Chowdhury, Peter Ireland, Geoffrey Evans, Subhasish Mitra","doi":"10.1016/j.mineng.2025.109526","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Performance of mineral flotation process in terms of grade and recovery is critically dependent on achieving the optimal gas dispersion in a flotation cell which involves three parameters − superficial gas velocity (j<sub>G</sub>), gas holdup (<span><math><mrow><msub><mover><mrow><mi>α</mi></mrow><mrow><mo>¯</mo></mrow></mover><mi>G</mi></msub></mrow></math></span>), and bubble size (d<sub>sea</sub>). In mechanical flotation cells, these parameters have been extensively studied, however current understanding of these parameters in the Reflux Flotation Cell (RFC™) remains significantly limited. This study aims to experimentally measure these parameters in a pilot-scale RFC™ system using high-speed imaging and differential pressure measurement technique by varying four operating fluxes which include − gas (j<sub>G</sub> = 0.42 to 2.09 cm/s), feed (F = 1.46 to 1.88 cm/s), wash water (W = 0.21 to 0.63 cm/s), and underflow (U = 1.46 to 1.88 cm/s). It was noted that increasing F and W fluxes resulted in smaller d<sub>sea</sub> due to increased shear rate and corresponding bubble breakups. The relationship between d<sub>sea</sub> and F was linear, while it plateaued with W. With F and W fluxes, the d<sub>sea</sub> decreased from a maximum of 1.37 and 1.11 mm to a minimum of 0.44 and 0.62 mm, respectively. Conversely, U flux increased d<sub>sea</sub> at low j<sub>G</sub> but decreased it at higher j<sub>G</sub>, with values ranging from ∼ 0.48 to 0.97 mm. Gas holdup exhibited a linear increase with j<sub>G</sub> but decreased with higher F and W fluxes or reduced U flux. The <span><math><mrow><msub><mover><mrow><mi>α</mi></mrow><mrow><mo>¯</mo></mrow></mover><mi>G</mi></msub></mrow></math></span> ranged between ∼ 0.37 and 0.72 for F and ∼ 0.46 and 0.65 for W, while U varied from ∼ 0.30 to 0.64. Feed flux had a stronger impact on d<sub>sea</sub>, whereas U flux was noted to affect <span><math><mrow><msub><mover><mrow><mi>α</mi></mrow><mrow><mo>¯</mo></mrow></mover><mi>G</mi></msub></mrow></math></span> more. Suitable empirical correlations were also developed to predict d<sub>sea</sub> and <span><math><mrow><msub><mover><mrow><mi>α</mi></mrow><mrow><mo>¯</mo></mrow></mover><mi>G</mi></msub></mrow></math></span> which agreed well with the experimental data. The overall hydrodynamics was characterised by two distinct flow regimes − bubbly flow, with minimal bubble coalescence at low j<sub>G</sub>, and churn-turbulent flow, characterized by frequent coalescence at high j<sub>G</sub>. It was noted that wash water flux destabilises the bubbly flow regime into churn turbulent flow with transition occurring at <span><math><mrow><msub><mover><mrow><mi>α</mi></mrow><mrow><mo>¯</mo></mrow></mover><mi>G</mi></msub></mrow></math></span> ≥ 0.6 and j<sub>G</sub> = 1.46 cm/s.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18594,"journal":{"name":"Minerals Engineering","volume":"232 ","pages":"Article 109526"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerals Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0892687525003541","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Performance of mineral flotation process in terms of grade and recovery is critically dependent on achieving the optimal gas dispersion in a flotation cell which involves three parameters − superficial gas velocity (jG), gas holdup (), and bubble size (dsea). In mechanical flotation cells, these parameters have been extensively studied, however current understanding of these parameters in the Reflux Flotation Cell (RFC™) remains significantly limited. This study aims to experimentally measure these parameters in a pilot-scale RFC™ system using high-speed imaging and differential pressure measurement technique by varying four operating fluxes which include − gas (jG = 0.42 to 2.09 cm/s), feed (F = 1.46 to 1.88 cm/s), wash water (W = 0.21 to 0.63 cm/s), and underflow (U = 1.46 to 1.88 cm/s). It was noted that increasing F and W fluxes resulted in smaller dsea due to increased shear rate and corresponding bubble breakups. The relationship between dsea and F was linear, while it plateaued with W. With F and W fluxes, the dsea decreased from a maximum of 1.37 and 1.11 mm to a minimum of 0.44 and 0.62 mm, respectively. Conversely, U flux increased dsea at low jG but decreased it at higher jG, with values ranging from ∼ 0.48 to 0.97 mm. Gas holdup exhibited a linear increase with jG but decreased with higher F and W fluxes or reduced U flux. The ranged between ∼ 0.37 and 0.72 for F and ∼ 0.46 and 0.65 for W, while U varied from ∼ 0.30 to 0.64. Feed flux had a stronger impact on dsea, whereas U flux was noted to affect more. Suitable empirical correlations were also developed to predict dsea and which agreed well with the experimental data. The overall hydrodynamics was characterised by two distinct flow regimes − bubbly flow, with minimal bubble coalescence at low jG, and churn-turbulent flow, characterized by frequent coalescence at high jG. It was noted that wash water flux destabilises the bubbly flow regime into churn turbulent flow with transition occurring at ≥ 0.6 and jG = 1.46 cm/s.
期刊介绍:
The purpose of the journal is to provide for the rapid publication of topical papers featuring the latest developments in the allied fields of mineral processing and extractive metallurgy. Its wide ranging coverage of research and practical (operating) topics includes physical separation methods, such as comminution, flotation concentration and dewatering, chemical methods such as bio-, hydro-, and electro-metallurgy, analytical techniques, process control, simulation and instrumentation, and mineralogical aspects of processing. Environmental issues, particularly those pertaining to sustainable development, will also be strongly covered.