Measurement of gas dispersion parameters in a reflux flotation cell

IF 4.9 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL
Abdullaziz Glabe Zakari, Raju Chowdhury, Peter Ireland, Geoffrey Evans, Subhasish Mitra
{"title":"Measurement of gas dispersion parameters in a reflux flotation cell","authors":"Abdullaziz Glabe Zakari,&nbsp;Raju Chowdhury,&nbsp;Peter Ireland,&nbsp;Geoffrey Evans,&nbsp;Subhasish Mitra","doi":"10.1016/j.mineng.2025.109526","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Performance of mineral flotation process in terms of grade and recovery is critically dependent on achieving the optimal gas dispersion in a flotation cell which involves three parameters − superficial gas velocity (j<sub>G</sub>), gas holdup (<span><math><mrow><msub><mover><mrow><mi>α</mi></mrow><mrow><mo>¯</mo></mrow></mover><mi>G</mi></msub></mrow></math></span>), and bubble size (d<sub>sea</sub>). In mechanical flotation cells, these parameters have been extensively studied, however current understanding of these parameters in the Reflux Flotation Cell (RFC™) remains significantly limited. This study aims to experimentally measure these parameters in a pilot-scale RFC™ system using high-speed imaging and differential pressure measurement technique by varying four operating fluxes which include − gas (j<sub>G</sub> = 0.42 to 2.09 cm/s), feed (F = 1.46 to 1.88 cm/s), wash water (W = 0.21 to 0.63 cm/s), and underflow (U = 1.46 to 1.88 cm/s). It was noted that increasing F and W fluxes resulted in smaller d<sub>sea</sub> due to increased shear rate and corresponding bubble breakups. The relationship between d<sub>sea</sub> and F was linear, while it plateaued with W. With F and W fluxes, the d<sub>sea</sub> decreased from a maximum of 1.37 and 1.11 mm to a minimum of 0.44 and 0.62 mm, respectively. Conversely, U flux increased d<sub>sea</sub> at low j<sub>G</sub> but decreased it at higher j<sub>G</sub>, with values ranging from ∼ 0.48 to 0.97 mm. Gas holdup exhibited a linear increase with j<sub>G</sub> but decreased with higher F and W fluxes or reduced U flux. The <span><math><mrow><msub><mover><mrow><mi>α</mi></mrow><mrow><mo>¯</mo></mrow></mover><mi>G</mi></msub></mrow></math></span> ranged between ∼ 0.37 and 0.72 for F and ∼ 0.46 and 0.65 for W, while U varied from ∼ 0.30 to 0.64. Feed flux had a stronger impact on d<sub>sea</sub>, whereas U flux was noted to affect <span><math><mrow><msub><mover><mrow><mi>α</mi></mrow><mrow><mo>¯</mo></mrow></mover><mi>G</mi></msub></mrow></math></span> more. Suitable empirical correlations were also developed to predict d<sub>sea</sub> and <span><math><mrow><msub><mover><mrow><mi>α</mi></mrow><mrow><mo>¯</mo></mrow></mover><mi>G</mi></msub></mrow></math></span> which agreed well with the experimental data. The overall hydrodynamics was characterised by two distinct flow regimes − bubbly flow, with minimal bubble coalescence at low j<sub>G</sub>, and churn-turbulent flow, characterized by frequent coalescence at high j<sub>G</sub>. It was noted that wash water flux destabilises the bubbly flow regime into churn turbulent flow with transition occurring at <span><math><mrow><msub><mover><mrow><mi>α</mi></mrow><mrow><mo>¯</mo></mrow></mover><mi>G</mi></msub></mrow></math></span> ≥ 0.6 and j<sub>G</sub> = 1.46 cm/s.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18594,"journal":{"name":"Minerals Engineering","volume":"232 ","pages":"Article 109526"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerals Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0892687525003541","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Performance of mineral flotation process in terms of grade and recovery is critically dependent on achieving the optimal gas dispersion in a flotation cell which involves three parameters − superficial gas velocity (jG), gas holdup (α¯G), and bubble size (dsea). In mechanical flotation cells, these parameters have been extensively studied, however current understanding of these parameters in the Reflux Flotation Cell (RFC™) remains significantly limited. This study aims to experimentally measure these parameters in a pilot-scale RFC™ system using high-speed imaging and differential pressure measurement technique by varying four operating fluxes which include − gas (jG = 0.42 to 2.09 cm/s), feed (F = 1.46 to 1.88 cm/s), wash water (W = 0.21 to 0.63 cm/s), and underflow (U = 1.46 to 1.88 cm/s). It was noted that increasing F and W fluxes resulted in smaller dsea due to increased shear rate and corresponding bubble breakups. The relationship between dsea and F was linear, while it plateaued with W. With F and W fluxes, the dsea decreased from a maximum of 1.37 and 1.11 mm to a minimum of 0.44 and 0.62 mm, respectively. Conversely, U flux increased dsea at low jG but decreased it at higher jG, with values ranging from ∼ 0.48 to 0.97 mm. Gas holdup exhibited a linear increase with jG but decreased with higher F and W fluxes or reduced U flux. The α¯G ranged between ∼ 0.37 and 0.72 for F and ∼ 0.46 and 0.65 for W, while U varied from ∼ 0.30 to 0.64. Feed flux had a stronger impact on dsea, whereas U flux was noted to affect α¯G more. Suitable empirical correlations were also developed to predict dsea and α¯G which agreed well with the experimental data. The overall hydrodynamics was characterised by two distinct flow regimes − bubbly flow, with minimal bubble coalescence at low jG, and churn-turbulent flow, characterized by frequent coalescence at high jG. It was noted that wash water flux destabilises the bubbly flow regime into churn turbulent flow with transition occurring at α¯G ≥ 0.6 and jG = 1.46 cm/s.
回流浮选池中气体分散参数的测定
矿物浮选过程在品位和回收率方面的性能关键取决于浮选池中气体的最佳分散,这涉及三个参数:表面气速(jG)、气含率(α¯G)和气泡尺寸(dsea)。在机械浮选池中,这些参数已经得到了广泛的研究,但是目前对回流浮选池(RFC™)中这些参数的了解仍然非常有限。本研究旨在利用高速成像和差压测量技术在中试规模RFC™系统中实验测量这些参数,通过改变四种操作通量,包括-气体(jG = 0.42至2.09 cm/s),进料(F = 1.46至1.88 cm/s),洗涤水(W = 0.21至0.63 cm/s)和底流(U = 1.46至1.88 cm/s)。研究指出,由于剪切速率的增加和相应的气泡破裂,F和W通量的增加导致海平面下降。随着F和W通量的增加,海平面从最大值1.37和1.11 mm下降到最小值0.44和0.62 mm。相反,在低jG下,U通量增加了海平面,但在高jG下降低了海平面,其值在~ 0.48 ~ 0.97 mm之间。气含率随jG的增加呈线性增加,但随F和W通量的增加或U通量的减少而降低。F的α¯G在~ 0.37 ~ 0.72之间,W的α¯G在~ 0.46 ~ 0.65之间,而U在~ 0.30 ~ 0.64之间变化。饲料通量对海水的影响更大,而U通量对α¯G的影响更大。并建立了相应的经验关系式来预测dsea和α¯G,与实验数据吻合较好。整体流体力学表现为两种不同的流动形式:气泡流动,在低焦耳加速度下气泡聚并最少;搅拌湍流,在高焦耳加速度下聚并频繁。研究发现,在α¯G≥0.6和jG = 1.46 cm/s时,冲洗水通量使气泡流不稳定,转变为搅拌湍流。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Minerals Engineering
Minerals Engineering 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
18.80%
发文量
519
审稿时长
81 days
期刊介绍: The purpose of the journal is to provide for the rapid publication of topical papers featuring the latest developments in the allied fields of mineral processing and extractive metallurgy. Its wide ranging coverage of research and practical (operating) topics includes physical separation methods, such as comminution, flotation concentration and dewatering, chemical methods such as bio-, hydro-, and electro-metallurgy, analytical techniques, process control, simulation and instrumentation, and mineralogical aspects of processing. Environmental issues, particularly those pertaining to sustainable development, will also be strongly covered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信