Insights from Agenda 21 for enhancing the implementation of the SDGs and shaping the Post-2030 sustainable development agenda

IF 4.7 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Earth System Governance Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-17 DOI:10.1016/j.esg.2025.100262
Mark Elder , Susanne Grünewald
{"title":"Insights from Agenda 21 for enhancing the implementation of the SDGs and shaping the Post-2030 sustainable development agenda","authors":"Mark Elder ,&nbsp;Susanne Grünewald","doi":"10.1016/j.esg.2025.100262","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper re-examines Agenda 21 for lessons to improve SDG implementation and contribute to discussions on the post-2030 sustainable development agenda. The SDGs' roots in Agenda 21 have been almost forgotten, as analyses of the SDGs' creation and structure highlighted “governance through goals” as a core feature and presented SDGs as the MDGs' successor. This paper, however, demonstrates that the SDGs' contents are substantially based on Agenda 21, especially their broad scope and integrated perspective, not just MDGs. While Agenda 21 was considered unsuccessful, no systematic assessment was conducted, so the lessons for improvement were not clear. Now is a good time to reconsider Agenda 21's experience to better understand the SDGs' strengths and weaknesses and consider possible implications for developing the post-2030 sustainable development agenda. Concretely, this paper surveys and synthesizes the similarities and differences between Agenda 21 and SDGs (including Agenda 2030), and existing non-systematic evaluations of Agenda 21. This paper argues that despite Agenda 21's uneven progress, it had more impact than is generally appreciated, so discussions of post-2030 should take its experience into account. Lessons to inform discussions on achieving the SDGs and developing the post-2030 agenda are presented.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":33685,"journal":{"name":"Earth System Governance","volume":"25 ","pages":"Article 100262"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earth System Governance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S258981162500028X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper re-examines Agenda 21 for lessons to improve SDG implementation and contribute to discussions on the post-2030 sustainable development agenda. The SDGs' roots in Agenda 21 have been almost forgotten, as analyses of the SDGs' creation and structure highlighted “governance through goals” as a core feature and presented SDGs as the MDGs' successor. This paper, however, demonstrates that the SDGs' contents are substantially based on Agenda 21, especially their broad scope and integrated perspective, not just MDGs. While Agenda 21 was considered unsuccessful, no systematic assessment was conducted, so the lessons for improvement were not clear. Now is a good time to reconsider Agenda 21's experience to better understand the SDGs' strengths and weaknesses and consider possible implications for developing the post-2030 sustainable development agenda. Concretely, this paper surveys and synthesizes the similarities and differences between Agenda 21 and SDGs (including Agenda 2030), and existing non-systematic evaluations of Agenda 21. This paper argues that despite Agenda 21's uneven progress, it had more impact than is generally appreciated, so discussions of post-2030 should take its experience into account. Lessons to inform discussions on achieving the SDGs and developing the post-2030 agenda are presented.
《21世纪议程》对加强落实可持续发展目标和制定2030年后可持续发展议程的见解
本文重新审视了《21世纪议程》,从中吸取教训,以改进可持续发展目标的实施,并为讨论2030年后可持续发展议程做出贡献。可持续发展目标在《21世纪议程》中的根源几乎被遗忘,因为对可持续发展目标创建和结构的分析强调了“通过目标进行治理”是其核心特征,并将可持续发展目标视为千年发展目标的继承者。然而,本文表明,可持续发展目标的内容实质上是基于《21世纪议程》,尤其是其广泛的范围和综合的视角,而不仅仅是千年发展目标。虽然《21世纪议程》被认为是不成功的,但没有进行系统的评价,因此改进的教训并不清楚。现在是重新考虑《21世纪议程》经验的好时机,以便更好地了解可持续发展目标的优缺点,并考虑对制定2030年后可持续发展议程可能产生的影响。具体而言,本文调查和综合了《21世纪议程》与可持续发展目标(包括2030年议程)的异同,以及现有的对《21世纪议程》的非系统评价。本文认为,尽管《21世纪议程》的进展参差不齐,但它的影响比人们普遍认为的要大,因此关于2030年后的讨论应该考虑到它的经验。本文介绍了为讨论实现可持续发展目标和制定2030年后议程提供参考的经验教训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
14.30%
发文量
31
审稿时长
35 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书