Can ETS pricing policies and clean subsidy policies lead to a cleaner power generation sector

IF 9.2 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Boyang Li, Runze Chen, Yuqin Du
{"title":"Can ETS pricing policies and clean subsidy policies lead to a cleaner power generation sector","authors":"Boyang Li,&nbsp;Runze Chen,&nbsp;Yuqin Du","doi":"10.1016/j.enpol.2025.114736","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>China currently implements an intensity-based carbon emissions trading system (ETS), a pricing mechanism that limits emissions while subsidizing output. This system has helped mitigate production losses associated with emission reductions. However, it tends to preserve traditional energy structures and impedes the transition toward cleaner development, particularly given China's reliance on inexpensive coal and the higher cost of cleaner energy sources. In response, China is actively considering new pricing strategies aimed at reducing output subsidies. This study develops a dynamic stochastic general equilibrium (DSGE) model that integrates the ETS with the power sector to evaluate how changes in pricing policies and clean energy subsidies influence emissions reduction and energy transition. The results indicate that: (i) transitioning to an aggregate-based pricing system significantly reduces emissions but also suppresses electricity generation due to insufficient incentives for clean energy adoption; (ii) increasing subsidies for clean energy promotes technological transition but has a limited impact on emissions, as it does not increase the relative cost of coal-fired power; and (iii) combining pricing reform with clean energy subsidies achieves greater emissions reductions and better preserves electricity output than either policy alone.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11672,"journal":{"name":"Energy Policy","volume":"206 ","pages":"Article 114736"},"PeriodicalIF":9.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421525002435","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

China currently implements an intensity-based carbon emissions trading system (ETS), a pricing mechanism that limits emissions while subsidizing output. This system has helped mitigate production losses associated with emission reductions. However, it tends to preserve traditional energy structures and impedes the transition toward cleaner development, particularly given China's reliance on inexpensive coal and the higher cost of cleaner energy sources. In response, China is actively considering new pricing strategies aimed at reducing output subsidies. This study develops a dynamic stochastic general equilibrium (DSGE) model that integrates the ETS with the power sector to evaluate how changes in pricing policies and clean energy subsidies influence emissions reduction and energy transition. The results indicate that: (i) transitioning to an aggregate-based pricing system significantly reduces emissions but also suppresses electricity generation due to insufficient incentives for clean energy adoption; (ii) increasing subsidies for clean energy promotes technological transition but has a limited impact on emissions, as it does not increase the relative cost of coal-fired power; and (iii) combining pricing reform with clean energy subsidies achieves greater emissions reductions and better preserves electricity output than either policy alone.
碳排放交易体系的定价政策和清洁能源补贴政策能否使发电行业变得更加清洁
中国目前实行的是以碳排放强度为基础的碳排放交易体系(ETS),这是一种在补贴产出的同时限制排放的定价机制。该系统有助于减少与减排有关的生产损失。然而,它倾向于保留传统的能源结构,阻碍向更清洁的发展过渡,特别是考虑到中国对廉价煤炭的依赖和更清洁能源的较高成本。作为回应,中国正在积极考虑旨在减少产出补贴的新定价策略。本研究建立了一个动态随机一般均衡(DSGE)模型,该模型将碳排放交易体系与电力部门相结合,以评估定价政策和清洁能源补贴的变化如何影响减排和能源转型。结果表明:(1)过渡到以总量为基础的定价制度显著减少了排放,但由于采用清洁能源的激励不足,也抑制了发电量;增加对清洁能源的补贴促进了技术转型,但对排放的影响有限,因为它不会增加燃煤发电的相对成本;(三)将定价改革与清洁能源补贴相结合,比单独实施任何一项政策都能实现更大的减排,更好地保护电力产出。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy Policy
Energy Policy 管理科学-环境科学
CiteScore
17.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
540
审稿时长
7.9 months
期刊介绍: Energy policy is the manner in which a given entity (often governmental) has decided to address issues of energy development including energy conversion, distribution and use as well as reduction of greenhouse gas emissions in order to contribute to climate change mitigation. The attributes of energy policy may include legislation, international treaties, incentives to investment, guidelines for energy conservation, taxation and other public policy techniques. Energy policy is closely related to climate change policy because totalled worldwide the energy sector emits more greenhouse gas than other sectors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信