{"title":"Utility of neuromuscular ultrasound and comparison of NMUS with electrodiagnostic tests in dominant spinocerebellar ataxia","authors":"Luciana Pelosi , Antonella Antenora , Julian Bauer , Rosa Iodice , Ruth Leadbetter , Fiore Manganelli , Eoin Mulroy , Miriam Rodrigues , Richard Roxburgh","doi":"10.1016/j.clinph.2025.2110783","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To estimate and compare the prevalence of sensory neuronopathy and neuropathy in autosomal dominant spinocerebellar ataxia (SCA) using neuromuscular ultrasound (NMUS) and traditional electrodiagnostic tests (EDX).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We compared NMUS [median and ulnar nerve cross-sectional areas (CSAs)] with EDX [sensory (sural, radial, median, ulnar); motor (median, ulnar, tibial)] findings from previously published and newly recruited patients with SCA (44 in total; SCA1 = 8, SCA2 = 27, SCA3 = 2; SCA6 = 7).</div><div>Sensory neuronopathy was diagnosed by reduced nerve CSA on NMUS and non length-dependent sensory axonal pattern on EDX, and neuropathy by enlarged nerve CSA on NMUS and length-dependent axonal pattern on EDX.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Abnormalities were detected significantly more frequently on NMUS than EDX (75 % vs 51 %, p < 0.001), especially sensory neuronopathy (57 % vs 32 %; p < 0.001). Ten of 24 sensory neuronopathies detected by NMUS were missed by EDX. No sensory neuronopathy detected by EDX was missed by NMUS.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions and significance</h3><div>The prevalence of abnormality, especially sensory neuronopathy, detected in our SCA cohort was significantly higher with NMUS than EDX.</div><div>This has significant implication for clinical practice. Where NMUS resources are available, NMUS can be proposed as the method of choice for the investigation of sensory neuronopathy in SCA.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10671,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neurophysiology","volume":"176 ","pages":"Article 2110783"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1388245725006352","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
To estimate and compare the prevalence of sensory neuronopathy and neuropathy in autosomal dominant spinocerebellar ataxia (SCA) using neuromuscular ultrasound (NMUS) and traditional electrodiagnostic tests (EDX).
Methods
We compared NMUS [median and ulnar nerve cross-sectional areas (CSAs)] with EDX [sensory (sural, radial, median, ulnar); motor (median, ulnar, tibial)] findings from previously published and newly recruited patients with SCA (44 in total; SCA1 = 8, SCA2 = 27, SCA3 = 2; SCA6 = 7).
Sensory neuronopathy was diagnosed by reduced nerve CSA on NMUS and non length-dependent sensory axonal pattern on EDX, and neuropathy by enlarged nerve CSA on NMUS and length-dependent axonal pattern on EDX.
Results
Abnormalities were detected significantly more frequently on NMUS than EDX (75 % vs 51 %, p < 0.001), especially sensory neuronopathy (57 % vs 32 %; p < 0.001). Ten of 24 sensory neuronopathies detected by NMUS were missed by EDX. No sensory neuronopathy detected by EDX was missed by NMUS.
Conclusions and significance
The prevalence of abnormality, especially sensory neuronopathy, detected in our SCA cohort was significantly higher with NMUS than EDX.
This has significant implication for clinical practice. Where NMUS resources are available, NMUS can be proposed as the method of choice for the investigation of sensory neuronopathy in SCA.
期刊介绍:
As of January 1999, The journal Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, and its two sections Electromyography and Motor Control and Evoked Potentials have amalgamated to become this journal - Clinical Neurophysiology.
Clinical Neurophysiology is the official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology, the Brazilian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, the Czech Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, the Italian Clinical Neurophysiology Society and the International Society of Intraoperative Neurophysiology.The journal is dedicated to fostering research and disseminating information on all aspects of both normal and abnormal functioning of the nervous system. The key aim of the publication is to disseminate scholarly reports on the pathophysiology underlying diseases of the central and peripheral nervous system of human patients. Clinical trials that use neurophysiological measures to document change are encouraged, as are manuscripts reporting data on integrated neuroimaging of central nervous function including, but not limited to, functional MRI, MEG, EEG, PET and other neuroimaging modalities.