Power-to-gas and power-to-liquid systems in emerging hydrogen valleys: techno-economic assessment of alternative fuels

Endeshaw Alemu Bekele , Antonio Sgaramella , Alessandro Ciancio , Gianluigi Lo Basso , Livio de Santoli , Lorenzo Mario Pastore
{"title":"Power-to-gas and power-to-liquid systems in emerging hydrogen valleys: techno-economic assessment of alternative fuels","authors":"Endeshaw Alemu Bekele ,&nbsp;Antonio Sgaramella ,&nbsp;Alessandro Ciancio ,&nbsp;Gianluigi Lo Basso ,&nbsp;Livio de Santoli ,&nbsp;Lorenzo Mario Pastore","doi":"10.1016/j.enss.2025.01.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study presents a techno-economic assessment of power-to-gas and power-to-liquid pathways within the Hydrogen Valley concept to support the decarbonization of local energy systems. Using the EnergyPLAN software, both business-as-usual and Hydrogen Valley scenarios were analyzed by varying renewable energy, electrolyzer capacity, and hydrogen storage. The levelized costs of green hydrogen, electrofuels, and synthetic natural gas were estimated for both scenarios. A sensitivity analysis was conducted to assess the impact of cost parameters on the levelized costs of hydrogen and alternative fuel production. The findings indicate that the Hydrogen Valley scenario results in a 5.9 % increase in total annual costs but achieves a 29.5 % reduction in CO<sub>2</sub> emissions compared to the business-as-usual scenario. Additionally, utilizing excess energy for power-to-gas and power-to-liquid conversion in the Hydrogen Valley scenario lowers the levelized cost of electrofuels from 0.28 €·kWh<sup>−1</sup> to 0.21 €·kWh<sup>−1</sup>. Similarly, the levelized cost of synthetic natural gas decreases from 0.33 €·kWh<sup>−1</sup> to 0.25 €·kWh<sup>−1</sup> when transitioning from the business-as-usual scenario to the Hydrogen Valley scenario. The results highlight that Hydrogen Valleys enable low-emission energy systems with cost-effective alternative fuels, underscoring the trade-offs between deep decarbonization and cost optimization in the transition to clean energy systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100472,"journal":{"name":"Energy Storage and Saving","volume":"4 2","pages":"Pages 148-156"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Storage and Saving","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277268352500007X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study presents a techno-economic assessment of power-to-gas and power-to-liquid pathways within the Hydrogen Valley concept to support the decarbonization of local energy systems. Using the EnergyPLAN software, both business-as-usual and Hydrogen Valley scenarios were analyzed by varying renewable energy, electrolyzer capacity, and hydrogen storage. The levelized costs of green hydrogen, electrofuels, and synthetic natural gas were estimated for both scenarios. A sensitivity analysis was conducted to assess the impact of cost parameters on the levelized costs of hydrogen and alternative fuel production. The findings indicate that the Hydrogen Valley scenario results in a 5.9 % increase in total annual costs but achieves a 29.5 % reduction in CO2 emissions compared to the business-as-usual scenario. Additionally, utilizing excess energy for power-to-gas and power-to-liquid conversion in the Hydrogen Valley scenario lowers the levelized cost of electrofuels from 0.28 €·kWh−1 to 0.21 €·kWh−1. Similarly, the levelized cost of synthetic natural gas decreases from 0.33 €·kWh−1 to 0.25 €·kWh−1 when transitioning from the business-as-usual scenario to the Hydrogen Valley scenario. The results highlight that Hydrogen Valleys enable low-emission energy systems with cost-effective alternative fuels, underscoring the trade-offs between deep decarbonization and cost optimization in the transition to clean energy systems.
新兴氢谷中的电制气和电制液系统:替代燃料的技术经济评估
本研究提出了氢谷概念中电力制气和电力制液途径的技术经济评估,以支持当地能源系统的脱碳。使用EnergyPLAN软件,通过不同的可再生能源、电解槽容量和氢储存,分析了常规业务和氢谷两种方案。对两种情况下的绿色氢、电燃料和合成天然气的平准化成本进行了估计。进行了敏感性分析,以评估成本参数对氢和替代燃料生产平准化成本的影响。研究结果表明,与常规情况相比,氢谷方案导致年度总成本增加5.9%,但二氧化碳排放量减少29.5%。此外,在氢谷方案中,利用多余的能量进行电制气和电制液转换,将电燃料的平均成本从0.28欧元·千瓦时- 1降低到0.21欧元·千瓦时- 1。同样,当从常规方案过渡到氢谷方案时,合成天然气的平化成本从0.33欧元·千瓦时- 1降至0.25欧元·千瓦时- 1。研究结果强调,氢谷使低排放能源系统能够使用具有成本效益的替代燃料,强调了向清洁能源系统过渡过程中深度脱碳和成本优化之间的权衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信