Passage performance of three small-sized fish species in a Vertical Slot Fishway with and without overhead cover

IF 4.1 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Fabio Tarena , Claudio Comoglio , Michele Spairani , Alessandro Candiotto , Muhammad Usama Ashraf , Margherita Abbà , Carlo Ruffino , Daniel Nyqvist
{"title":"Passage performance of three small-sized fish species in a Vertical Slot Fishway with and without overhead cover","authors":"Fabio Tarena ,&nbsp;Claudio Comoglio ,&nbsp;Michele Spairani ,&nbsp;Alessandro Candiotto ,&nbsp;Muhammad Usama Ashraf ,&nbsp;Margherita Abbà ,&nbsp;Carlo Ruffino ,&nbsp;Daniel Nyqvist","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2025.107713","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Hydropower dams block fish movement, cause river fragmentation, and constitute a threat to biodiversity worldwide. Vertical Slot Fishways (VSF) are a widespread solution to mitigate these effects by enabling fish passage at obstacles. In the past, fish passage research has focused mainly on strong swimming salmonids, often resulting in knowledge gaps and low passage success for other fish species, especially small-sized ones. In addition, although hydrodynamics is fundamental to assess the functionality of a fishway, other environmental factors can impact passage success. Light can affect several behaviors in fish and often plays a role in fish migration and movement. At fishways, light can both promote and hinder passage, with highly species-specific effects remaining underexplored for many species. Here we study the passage performance in an alternatingly open and covered VSF of three small-sized fish species: brook barbel (<em>Barbus caninus</em>), European bullhead (<em>Cottus gobio</em>), and Italian riffle dace (<em>Telestes muticellus</em>). Passage success was very high for brook barbel (100 %) and Italian riffle dace (95.2 %) while fewer European bullhead (46.4 %) successfully passed the fishway. Fish showed a preference for passage without overhead cover: both brook barbel and Italian riffle dace displayed lower overall passage rates under covered compared to open conditions, and entry rates were lower with cover for all three species.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11490,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Engineering","volume":"219 ","pages":"Article 107713"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857425002034","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hydropower dams block fish movement, cause river fragmentation, and constitute a threat to biodiversity worldwide. Vertical Slot Fishways (VSF) are a widespread solution to mitigate these effects by enabling fish passage at obstacles. In the past, fish passage research has focused mainly on strong swimming salmonids, often resulting in knowledge gaps and low passage success for other fish species, especially small-sized ones. In addition, although hydrodynamics is fundamental to assess the functionality of a fishway, other environmental factors can impact passage success. Light can affect several behaviors in fish and often plays a role in fish migration and movement. At fishways, light can both promote and hinder passage, with highly species-specific effects remaining underexplored for many species. Here we study the passage performance in an alternatingly open and covered VSF of three small-sized fish species: brook barbel (Barbus caninus), European bullhead (Cottus gobio), and Italian riffle dace (Telestes muticellus). Passage success was very high for brook barbel (100 %) and Italian riffle dace (95.2 %) while fewer European bullhead (46.4 %) successfully passed the fishway. Fish showed a preference for passage without overhead cover: both brook barbel and Italian riffle dace displayed lower overall passage rates under covered compared to open conditions, and entry rates were lower with cover for all three species.
三种小型鱼类在有顶盖和无顶盖的垂直槽式鱼道中的通行性能
水电站大坝阻碍鱼类运动,造成河流破碎,并对全球生物多样性构成威胁。垂直槽式鱼道(VSF)是一种广泛的解决方案,可以通过障碍物来减轻这些影响。过去,鱼类洄游研究主要集中在游动能力强的鲑科鱼类上,这往往导致其他鱼类,特别是小型鱼类的知识空白和低洄游成功率。此外,虽然流体力学是评估鱼道功能的基础,但其他环境因素也会影响通道的成功。光可以影响鱼类的一些行为,并经常在鱼类的迁徙和运动中发挥作用。在鱼道上,光既能促进也能阻碍通过,对许多物种来说,光对物种特异性的影响尚未得到充分的研究。本文研究了三种小型鱼类:溪刺鱼(Barbus caninus)、欧洲牛头鱼(Cottus gobio)和意大利梭子鱼(Telestes muticellus)在交替开放和覆盖的VSF中的通过性能。通过鱼道的成功率非常高的是梭子鱼(100%)和意大利梭子鱼(95.2%),而通过鱼道的欧洲牛头鱼(46.4%)较少。鱼类表现出对无顶棚的通行偏好:与开放条件相比,有顶棚条件下的总通行率较低,而有顶棚条件下这三种鱼类的进入率均较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecological Engineering
Ecological Engineering 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
293
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Ecological engineering has been defined as the design of ecosystems for the mutual benefit of humans and nature. The journal is meant for ecologists who, because of their research interests or occupation, are involved in designing, monitoring, or restoring ecosystems, and can serve as a bridge between ecologists and engineers. Specific topics covered in the journal include: habitat reconstruction; ecotechnology; synthetic ecology; bioengineering; restoration ecology; ecology conservation; ecosystem rehabilitation; stream and river restoration; reclamation ecology; non-renewable resource conservation. Descriptions of specific applications of ecological engineering are acceptable only when situated within context of adding novelty to current research and emphasizing ecosystem restoration. We do not accept purely descriptive reports on ecosystem structures (such as vegetation surveys), purely physical assessment of materials that can be used for ecological restoration, small-model studies carried out in the laboratory or greenhouse with artificial (waste)water or crop studies, or case studies on conventional wastewater treatment and eutrophication that do not offer an ecosystem restoration approach within the paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信