Fabio Tarena , Claudio Comoglio , Michele Spairani , Alessandro Candiotto , Muhammad Usama Ashraf , Margherita Abbà , Carlo Ruffino , Daniel Nyqvist
{"title":"Passage performance of three small-sized fish species in a Vertical Slot Fishway with and without overhead cover","authors":"Fabio Tarena , Claudio Comoglio , Michele Spairani , Alessandro Candiotto , Muhammad Usama Ashraf , Margherita Abbà , Carlo Ruffino , Daniel Nyqvist","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2025.107713","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Hydropower dams block fish movement, cause river fragmentation, and constitute a threat to biodiversity worldwide. Vertical Slot Fishways (VSF) are a widespread solution to mitigate these effects by enabling fish passage at obstacles. In the past, fish passage research has focused mainly on strong swimming salmonids, often resulting in knowledge gaps and low passage success for other fish species, especially small-sized ones. In addition, although hydrodynamics is fundamental to assess the functionality of a fishway, other environmental factors can impact passage success. Light can affect several behaviors in fish and often plays a role in fish migration and movement. At fishways, light can both promote and hinder passage, with highly species-specific effects remaining underexplored for many species. Here we study the passage performance in an alternatingly open and covered VSF of three small-sized fish species: brook barbel (<em>Barbus caninus</em>), European bullhead (<em>Cottus gobio</em>), and Italian riffle dace (<em>Telestes muticellus</em>). Passage success was very high for brook barbel (100 %) and Italian riffle dace (95.2 %) while fewer European bullhead (46.4 %) successfully passed the fishway. Fish showed a preference for passage without overhead cover: both brook barbel and Italian riffle dace displayed lower overall passage rates under covered compared to open conditions, and entry rates were lower with cover for all three species.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11490,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Engineering","volume":"219 ","pages":"Article 107713"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857425002034","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Hydropower dams block fish movement, cause river fragmentation, and constitute a threat to biodiversity worldwide. Vertical Slot Fishways (VSF) are a widespread solution to mitigate these effects by enabling fish passage at obstacles. In the past, fish passage research has focused mainly on strong swimming salmonids, often resulting in knowledge gaps and low passage success for other fish species, especially small-sized ones. In addition, although hydrodynamics is fundamental to assess the functionality of a fishway, other environmental factors can impact passage success. Light can affect several behaviors in fish and often plays a role in fish migration and movement. At fishways, light can both promote and hinder passage, with highly species-specific effects remaining underexplored for many species. Here we study the passage performance in an alternatingly open and covered VSF of three small-sized fish species: brook barbel (Barbus caninus), European bullhead (Cottus gobio), and Italian riffle dace (Telestes muticellus). Passage success was very high for brook barbel (100 %) and Italian riffle dace (95.2 %) while fewer European bullhead (46.4 %) successfully passed the fishway. Fish showed a preference for passage without overhead cover: both brook barbel and Italian riffle dace displayed lower overall passage rates under covered compared to open conditions, and entry rates were lower with cover for all three species.
期刊介绍:
Ecological engineering has been defined as the design of ecosystems for the mutual benefit of humans and nature. The journal is meant for ecologists who, because of their research interests or occupation, are involved in designing, monitoring, or restoring ecosystems, and can serve as a bridge between ecologists and engineers.
Specific topics covered in the journal include: habitat reconstruction; ecotechnology; synthetic ecology; bioengineering; restoration ecology; ecology conservation; ecosystem rehabilitation; stream and river restoration; reclamation ecology; non-renewable resource conservation. Descriptions of specific applications of ecological engineering are acceptable only when situated within context of adding novelty to current research and emphasizing ecosystem restoration. We do not accept purely descriptive reports on ecosystem structures (such as vegetation surveys), purely physical assessment of materials that can be used for ecological restoration, small-model studies carried out in the laboratory or greenhouse with artificial (waste)water or crop studies, or case studies on conventional wastewater treatment and eutrophication that do not offer an ecosystem restoration approach within the paper.