Priority ranking for the conservation of all European bryophyte species

IF 4.4 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Irene Bisang , Norbert Schnyder , Christian Schröck , Nick Hodgetts , Neil Lockhart , Ariel Bergamini
{"title":"Priority ranking for the conservation of all European bryophyte species","authors":"Irene Bisang ,&nbsp;Norbert Schnyder ,&nbsp;Christian Schröck ,&nbsp;Nick Hodgetts ,&nbsp;Neil Lockhart ,&nbsp;Ariel Bergamini","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111297","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Biological diversity declines rapidly and resources for conservation actions to halt the loss are limited. It requires setting appropriate conservation priorities. We present an efficient and reproducible approach to identify European bryophytes species that warrant highest conservation attention. We used two independent criteria to define conservation priorities: i) Red List status in Europe; ii) European population size relative to the global population or global rarity, respectively, by combining the best available information with expert judgment. We assigned a quantitative score for both criteria separately to each of the 553 threatened (i.e., Critically Endangered, Endangered, Vulnerable) and Near Threatened species and calculated their sum as the “Priority Score for conservation”. Applying this global perspective, the conservation priorities presented here differ from a prioritisation solely based on regional Red List status. We used distinct thresholds to the Priority Scores, which resulted in 135 (24 %) species of high, 126 (23 %) of medium, and 292 (53 %) of low priority for conservation. We provide occurrence data for each species, and for additional European endemics, together with conservation priority scores for all European countries or territories, making the priority scheme readily applicable for national conservation decisions. Areas with oceanic climates, especially Macaronesia, and mountainous regions harbour many species of conservation concern. We recommend a process how to apply the Priority Scores in the scope of national legislation, policies and expertise. Our method will assist national agencies and conservationists to direct resources to conservation actions for bryophytes whose persistence in Europe is critical from a global viewpoint.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55375,"journal":{"name":"Biological Conservation","volume":"309 ","pages":"Article 111297"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320725003349","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Biological diversity declines rapidly and resources for conservation actions to halt the loss are limited. It requires setting appropriate conservation priorities. We present an efficient and reproducible approach to identify European bryophytes species that warrant highest conservation attention. We used two independent criteria to define conservation priorities: i) Red List status in Europe; ii) European population size relative to the global population or global rarity, respectively, by combining the best available information with expert judgment. We assigned a quantitative score for both criteria separately to each of the 553 threatened (i.e., Critically Endangered, Endangered, Vulnerable) and Near Threatened species and calculated their sum as the “Priority Score for conservation”. Applying this global perspective, the conservation priorities presented here differ from a prioritisation solely based on regional Red List status. We used distinct thresholds to the Priority Scores, which resulted in 135 (24 %) species of high, 126 (23 %) of medium, and 292 (53 %) of low priority for conservation. We provide occurrence data for each species, and for additional European endemics, together with conservation priority scores for all European countries or territories, making the priority scheme readily applicable for national conservation decisions. Areas with oceanic climates, especially Macaronesia, and mountainous regions harbour many species of conservation concern. We recommend a process how to apply the Priority Scores in the scope of national legislation, policies and expertise. Our method will assist national agencies and conservationists to direct resources to conservation actions for bryophytes whose persistence in Europe is critical from a global viewpoint.
欧洲所有苔藓植物物种保护的优先排序
生物多样性迅速下降,而用于阻止这种损失的保护行动的资源有限。这需要设定适当的保护优先级。我们提出了一种有效和可复制的方法来鉴定欧洲苔藓植物物种,需要最高的保护关注。我们使用了两个独立的标准来定义保护优先级:i)欧洲的红色名录;ii)通过将最佳可用信息与专家判断相结合,分别确定欧洲人口规模相对于全球人口或全球稀有性。我们分别为553种受威胁(即极度濒危、濒危、脆弱)和近危物种分配了两个标准的定量得分,并计算出它们的总和作为“保护优先得分”。从全球的角度来看,这里提出的保护优先事项不同于仅仅基于区域红色名录状态的优先事项。我们采用不同的阈值对优先级评分进行划分,结果表明135种(24%)为高优先级,126种(23%)为中等优先级,292种(53%)为低优先级。我们提供了每个物种的发生数据,以及其他欧洲特有物种的数据,以及所有欧洲国家或地区的保护优先级得分,使优先级方案易于适用于国家保护决策。海洋性气候的地区,尤其是马卡罗尼西亚和山区,拥有许多值得保护的物种。我们建议一个如何在国家立法、政策和专门知识范围内应用优先分数的程序。我们的方法将帮助国家机构和保护主义者将资源用于苔藓植物的保护行动,这些苔藓植物在欧洲的持久性从全球的角度来看是至关重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biological Conservation
Biological Conservation 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
3.40%
发文量
295
审稿时长
61 days
期刊介绍: Biological Conservation is an international leading journal in the discipline of conservation biology. The journal publishes articles spanning a diverse range of fields that contribute to the biological, sociological, and economic dimensions of conservation and natural resource management. The primary aim of Biological Conservation is the publication of high-quality papers that advance the science and practice of conservation, or which demonstrate the application of conservation principles for natural resource management and policy. Therefore it will be of interest to a broad international readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信