Efficiency comparison of succinic acid and oxalic acid with choline chloride deep-eutectic solvent through response surface methodology

IF 5.5 3区工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL

Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers Pub Date : 2025-06-18 DOI:10.1016/j.jtice.2025.106230

Shang-Cyuan Chen , Feng-Chih Chou , Shivani Shirke , Shou-Yuan Lin , Yuan-Chung Lin

{"title":"Efficiency comparison of succinic acid and oxalic acid with choline chloride deep-eutectic solvent through response surface methodology","authors":"Shang-Cyuan Chen , Feng-Chih Chou , Shivani Shirke , Shou-Yuan Lin , Yuan-Chung Lin","doi":"10.1016/j.jtice.2025.106230","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Recycling spent lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) is an urgent issue due to their rapid growth and environmental impact. Lithium cobalt oxide (LiCoO2, LCO) is a valuable cathode material, making cobalt a critical raw material with many applications.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In our study, we introduce a new approach using a deep-eutectic solvent (DES) made of choline chloride-succinic acid as a solution for extracting cobalt from LIBs. Our method, based on a complete factorial experimental design, explores various parameters affecting cobalt extraction efficiency from spent LIBs. The extraction experiments were carried out using both an oil bath and a microwave-assisted heating system.</div></div><div><h3>Significant Findings</h3><div>The Co(OH)<sub>2</sub> can be isolated from the extracted solution using the electrodeposition method, with an electrolyzing efficiency of 84 %-93 % (SA-OA) and a purity of 97.5 %. This study presents a comparison of the performance of succinic acid and oxalic acid as sustainable alternatives to conventional methods to recover spent LIBs more effectively.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":381,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers","volume":"174 ","pages":"Article 106230"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876107025002834","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Recycling spent lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) is an urgent issue due to their rapid growth and environmental impact. Lithium cobalt oxide (LiCoO2, LCO) is a valuable cathode material, making cobalt a critical raw material with many applications.

Methods

In our study, we introduce a new approach using a deep-eutectic solvent (DES) made of choline chloride-succinic acid as a solution for extracting cobalt from LIBs. Our method, based on a complete factorial experimental design, explores various parameters affecting cobalt extraction efficiency from spent LIBs. The extraction experiments were carried out using both an oil bath and a microwave-assisted heating system.

Significant Findings

The Co(OH)₂ can be isolated from the extracted solution using the electrodeposition method, with an electrolyzing efficiency of 84 %-93 % (SA-OA) and a purity of 97.5 %. This study presents a comparison of the performance of succinic acid and oxalic acid as sustainable alternatives to conventional methods to recover spent LIBs more effectively.

查看原文本刊更多论文

响应面法比较琥珀酸和草酸与氯化胆碱深共晶溶剂的效率

废旧锂离子电池（lib）由于其快速增长和对环境的影响，回收是一个紧迫的问题。锂钴氧化物（LiCoO2， LCO）是一种有价值的正极材料，使钴成为具有许多应用的关键原材料。方法采用氯化胆碱-琥珀酸组成的深度共晶溶剂（DES）作为溶液，从锂离子电池中提取钴。我们的方法基于完全析因实验设计，探索了影响废lib中钴提取效率的各种参数。提取实验采用油浴法和微波辅助加热系统进行。电沉积法可从萃取液中分离出Co(OH)2，电解效率为84% ~ 93% (SA-OA)，纯度为97.5%。本研究比较了琥珀酸和草酸作为传统方法的可持续替代品，更有效地回收废lib。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers 工程技术-工程：化工

CiteScore

9.10

自引率

14.00%

发文量

362

审稿时长

35 days

期刊介绍： Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers (formerly known as Journal of the Chinese Institute of Chemical Engineers) publishes original works, from fundamental principles to practical applications, in the broad field of chemical engineering with special focus on three aspects: Chemical and Biomolecular Science and Technology, Energy and Environmental Science and Technology, and Materials Science and Technology. Authors should choose for their manuscript an appropriate aspect section and a few related classifications when submitting to the journal online.