How does prior knowledge affect learning? A review of 16 mechanisms and a framework for future research

IF 3.8 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL
Michael Schneider, Bianca A. Simonsmeier
{"title":"How does prior knowledge affect learning? A review of 16 mechanisms and a framework for future research","authors":"Michael Schneider,&nbsp;Bianca A. Simonsmeier","doi":"10.1016/j.lindif.2025.102744","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The knowledge-is-power hypothesis posits that individual differences in domain-specific prior knowledge are among the strongest positive determinants of learning. However, a large recent meta-analysis found that the correlations between prior knowledge and knowledge gains had a mean of zero and a large range. This Prior Knowledge Paradox demonstrates the need to understand better how prior knowledge affects learning. We give an integrative review of 16 learning processes mediating the effects of prior knowledge on learning outcomes in learners, for example, encoding, chunking, comprehension, interest, cognitive load, meta-cognition, transfer, and interference. Each process is moderated by further variables, such as content domain, learner characteristics, or instruction. We summarize these findings in the Multiple Moderated Mediations (Triple-M) framework for future research, which emphasizes that a full understanding of the effect of prior knowledge on learning requires the joint consideration of the multiple cognitive and motivational learning mechanisms and moderating influences on them.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48336,"journal":{"name":"Learning and Individual Differences","volume":"122 ","pages":"Article 102744"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning and Individual Differences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1041608025001207","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The knowledge-is-power hypothesis posits that individual differences in domain-specific prior knowledge are among the strongest positive determinants of learning. However, a large recent meta-analysis found that the correlations between prior knowledge and knowledge gains had a mean of zero and a large range. This Prior Knowledge Paradox demonstrates the need to understand better how prior knowledge affects learning. We give an integrative review of 16 learning processes mediating the effects of prior knowledge on learning outcomes in learners, for example, encoding, chunking, comprehension, interest, cognitive load, meta-cognition, transfer, and interference. Each process is moderated by further variables, such as content domain, learner characteristics, or instruction. We summarize these findings in the Multiple Moderated Mediations (Triple-M) framework for future research, which emphasizes that a full understanding of the effect of prior knowledge on learning requires the joint consideration of the multiple cognitive and motivational learning mechanisms and moderating influences on them.
先验知识如何影响学习?综述了16种机制和未来研究的框架
知识即力量假说认为,特定领域先验知识的个体差异是学习的最强积极决定因素之一。然而,最近的一项大型荟萃分析发现,先验知识和知识增益之间的相关性平均值为零,且范围很大。先验知识悖论表明,我们需要更好地理解先验知识是如何影响学习的。本文综述了编码、组块、理解、兴趣、认知负荷、元认知、迁移和干扰等16个学习过程对学习者学习结果的影响。每个过程都由进一步的变量调节,例如内容领域、学习者特征或指导。我们将这些发现总结为未来研究的多重调节机制(Multiple Moderated mediation, Triple-M)框架,强调充分理解先验知识对学习的影响需要综合考虑多种认知和动机学习机制及其调节作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Learning and Individual Differences
Learning and Individual Differences PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
2.80%
发文量
86
期刊介绍: Learning and Individual Differences is a research journal devoted to publishing articles of individual differences as they relate to learning within an educational context. The Journal focuses on original empirical studies of high theoretical and methodological rigor that that make a substantial scientific contribution. Learning and Individual Differences publishes original research. Manuscripts should be no longer than 7500 words of primary text (not including tables, figures, references).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信