Creating a new climate transition politics? Reflections on a Real Deal for Australia

IF 4.9 1区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Amanda Tattersall , Katie Moore , Juliet Bennett , Christine Evans , Louise C. Johnson , Naomi Joy Godden , Dibya Shree Chhetry , Elise Ganley , Sally Fisher , Jaclyn McCosker , Jade Wright , Liz Bonner , Helen Long , Noreen Nicholson
{"title":"Creating a new climate transition politics? Reflections on a Real Deal for Australia","authors":"Amanda Tattersall ,&nbsp;Katie Moore ,&nbsp;Juliet Bennett ,&nbsp;Christine Evans ,&nbsp;Louise C. Johnson ,&nbsp;Naomi Joy Godden ,&nbsp;Dibya Shree Chhetry ,&nbsp;Elise Ganley ,&nbsp;Sally Fisher ,&nbsp;Jaclyn McCosker ,&nbsp;Jade Wright ,&nbsp;Liz Bonner ,&nbsp;Helen Long ,&nbsp;Noreen Nicholson","doi":"10.1016/j.polgeo.2025.103347","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Economic responses to climate change, such as just transitions and the Green New Deal (GND), have helped shift climate policy debate to focus on the economic dimensions of climate change. Yet these approaches have also been limited; they have not always delivered, they have left some groups behind and at times have polarised affected constituencies. This article argues that a key reason for this is that these agendas have primarily involved imposing solutions on communities without activating people's participation in the perpetual cocreation of new social, political and economic solutions. Here, community and academic researchers reflect on the first five years of the <em>Real Deal for Australia</em> project and its effort to realise a community-led climate transition politics through its application of the ‘relational method’. This paper locates the Real Deal within the traditions of just transitions and the GND, and details the theories, methods and practices that it has built upon and involved, including in two place-based projects. It reflects on the intentions of the project and the learning that has occurred in the process, in particular from seeking to privilege the voices of Indigenous Peoples, form diverse community coalitions made up of strong interpersonal relationships between existing trade union, environmental, neighbourhood and faith-based groups, produce robust place-based agendas and buid effective actions for alternative futures.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48262,"journal":{"name":"Political Geography","volume":"121 ","pages":"Article 103347"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Geography","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0962629825000794","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Economic responses to climate change, such as just transitions and the Green New Deal (GND), have helped shift climate policy debate to focus on the economic dimensions of climate change. Yet these approaches have also been limited; they have not always delivered, they have left some groups behind and at times have polarised affected constituencies. This article argues that a key reason for this is that these agendas have primarily involved imposing solutions on communities without activating people's participation in the perpetual cocreation of new social, political and economic solutions. Here, community and academic researchers reflect on the first five years of the Real Deal for Australia project and its effort to realise a community-led climate transition politics through its application of the ‘relational method’. This paper locates the Real Deal within the traditions of just transitions and the GND, and details the theories, methods and practices that it has built upon and involved, including in two place-based projects. It reflects on the intentions of the project and the learning that has occurred in the process, in particular from seeking to privilege the voices of Indigenous Peoples, form diverse community coalitions made up of strong interpersonal relationships between existing trade union, environmental, neighbourhood and faith-based groups, produce robust place-based agendas and buid effective actions for alternative futures.
创造一种新的气候转型政治?对澳大利亚真正交易的反思
气候变化的经济应对措施,如转型和绿色新政(GND),有助于将气候政策辩论转向气候变化的经济层面。然而,这些方法也有局限性;他们并不总是能兑现承诺,他们把一些群体抛在了后面,有时还使受影响的选区两极分化。本文认为,造成这种情况的一个关键原因是,这些议程主要涉及将解决方案强加给社区,而没有激活人们参与新的社会、政治和经济解决方案的永久共同创造。在这里,社区和学术研究人员反思了澳大利亚真正交易项目的前五年,以及它通过应用“关系方法”实现社区主导的气候过渡政治的努力。本文将Real Deal置于公正过渡和GND的传统中,并详细介绍了它所建立和涉及的理论、方法和实践,包括两个基于地方的项目。它反映了该项目的意图和在此过程中获得的经验教训,特别是寻求给予土著人民的声音以特权,形成由现有工会、环境、邻里和信仰团体之间牢固的人际关系组成的多样化社区联盟,制定强有力的基于地方的议程,并为替代未来制定有效的行动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
14.60%
发文量
210
期刊介绍: Political Geography is the flagship journal of political geography and research on the spatial dimensions of politics. The journal brings together leading contributions in its field, promoting international and interdisciplinary communication. Research emphases cover all scales of inquiry and diverse theories, methods, and methodologies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信