Melting Point Prediction of Organic Crystals Using Direct Molecular Dynamics Simulations

IF 3.2 2区 化学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Nahyun Chi, Jungim Han, Joonghee Won and Jun Soo Kim*, 
{"title":"Melting Point Prediction of Organic Crystals Using Direct Molecular Dynamics Simulations","authors":"Nahyun Chi,&nbsp;Jungim Han,&nbsp;Joonghee Won and Jun Soo Kim*,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acs.cgd.4c0175310.1021/acs.cgd.4c01753","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Accurate melting point prediction is essential for investigating the molecular mechanisms of crystal growth and melting using molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. Here, we assess melting point predictions from direct MD simulations of nitromethane and acetic acid. This study has three objectives: to evaluate popular force fields (CGenFF, OPLS, GAFF), to assess various MD approaches (simulations of solid/liquid, vapor/solid/liquid/vapor, vapor/solid/vapor, and solid alone), and to compare the crystal growth and melting of both compounds, focusing specifically on the time scale and anisotropy. Our results indicate that none of the popular force fields accurately predict melting points, highlighting the need for improvement. All MD simulation approaches yielded consistent melting points of either compound, except for the solid-alone simulation, while continuous heating of the vapor/solid/vapor system proved effective. The time scales of crystal growth and melting differ significantly between the molecules: 20 ns for nitromethane and 200 ns for acetic acid. Anisotropy in crystal growth and melting is non-negligible and much more pronounced for acetic acid compared to nitromethane. These findings offer practical considerations for simulating melting phenomena in molecular crystals using MD.</p>","PeriodicalId":34,"journal":{"name":"Crystal Growth & Design","volume":"25 12","pages":"4169–4177 4169–4177"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crystal Growth & Design","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.cgd.4c01753","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accurate melting point prediction is essential for investigating the molecular mechanisms of crystal growth and melting using molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. Here, we assess melting point predictions from direct MD simulations of nitromethane and acetic acid. This study has three objectives: to evaluate popular force fields (CGenFF, OPLS, GAFF), to assess various MD approaches (simulations of solid/liquid, vapor/solid/liquid/vapor, vapor/solid/vapor, and solid alone), and to compare the crystal growth and melting of both compounds, focusing specifically on the time scale and anisotropy. Our results indicate that none of the popular force fields accurately predict melting points, highlighting the need for improvement. All MD simulation approaches yielded consistent melting points of either compound, except for the solid-alone simulation, while continuous heating of the vapor/solid/vapor system proved effective. The time scales of crystal growth and melting differ significantly between the molecules: 20 ns for nitromethane and 200 ns for acetic acid. Anisotropy in crystal growth and melting is non-negligible and much more pronounced for acetic acid compared to nitromethane. These findings offer practical considerations for simulating melting phenomena in molecular crystals using MD.

直接分子动力学模拟有机晶体熔点预测
准确的熔点预测对于利用分子动力学(MD)模拟研究晶体生长和熔化的分子机制至关重要。在这里,我们评估熔点预测从硝基甲烷和乙酸的直接MD模拟。本研究有三个目标:评估常用的力场(CGenFF, OPLS, GAFF),评估各种MD方法(模拟固体/液体,蒸汽/固体/液体/蒸汽,蒸汽/固体/蒸汽和单独固体),并比较两种化合物的晶体生长和熔化,特别关注时间尺度和各向异性。我们的结果表明,没有一个流行的力场能准确地预测熔点,突出了需要改进的地方。除了单独的固体模拟外,所有的MD模拟方法都得到了两种化合物的一致熔点,而连续加热蒸汽/固体/蒸汽系统被证明是有效的。分子间晶体生长和熔化的时间尺度差异显著:硝基甲烷为20 ns,醋酸为200 ns。晶体生长和熔化的各向异性是不可忽视的,与硝基甲烷相比,乙酸的各向异性更为明显。这些发现为用MD模拟分子晶体中的熔化现象提供了实际考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Crystal Growth & Design
Crystal Growth & Design 化学-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
10.50%
发文量
650
审稿时长
1.9 months
期刊介绍: The aim of Crystal Growth & Design is to stimulate crossfertilization of knowledge among scientists and engineers working in the fields of crystal growth, crystal engineering, and the industrial application of crystalline materials. Crystal Growth & Design publishes theoretical and experimental studies of the physical, chemical, and biological phenomena and processes related to the design, growth, and application of crystalline materials. Synergistic approaches originating from different disciplines and technologies and integrating the fields of crystal growth, crystal engineering, intermolecular interactions, and industrial application are encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信