{"title":"Stochastic framework reveals the controls of forest treatment – peakflow causal relations in rain environment","authors":"Henry C. Pham , Younes Alila , Peter V. Caldwell","doi":"10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.133704","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Decades of literature on forest treatment – peakflow relations have generated considerable disagreements and turned the topic into one regarded as enigmatic. Factors affecting peakflows are multiple and chancy and, hence, can only be investigated via a probabilistic approach. We analyze peakflow data using the peakflow frequency distribution framework in two pairs of control-treatment watersheds in the rain environment of an experimental forest in North Carolina. We demonstrate how a range of forest treatments can change the magnitude and frequency of all peakflows on record and how such effects can increase with increasing event size as a consequence of changes to the peakflow frequency distribution. Changes to the distribution’s mean (−0.2 to +47.4 %) and variance (−30.9 to +162.1 %) resulted in a range of effects from no significant impacts on peakflows to making larger peakflows becoming even larger (up to 105 % increase) and more frequent (up to 18 times more frequent). Changes to peakflows are attributed to treatment-induced suppression of evapotranspiration and changes to non-vegetative factors, which can alter the soil storage capacity, moisture available for runoff, and the efficiency of runoff arriving to the outlet. The dominant topographical aspect of the watershed, seasonal differences in storm types, extent to which the storm events are in-phase or out-of-phase with high antecedent soil moisture, and lagged runoff responses with watershed memory emerged as key indicators of the sensitivity of peakflows to forest treatment. The application of the stochastic framework in forest hydrology can help fully understand forest treatment – peakflows relations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":362,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hydrology","volume":"661 ","pages":"Article 133704"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hydrology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002216942501042X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Decades of literature on forest treatment – peakflow relations have generated considerable disagreements and turned the topic into one regarded as enigmatic. Factors affecting peakflows are multiple and chancy and, hence, can only be investigated via a probabilistic approach. We analyze peakflow data using the peakflow frequency distribution framework in two pairs of control-treatment watersheds in the rain environment of an experimental forest in North Carolina. We demonstrate how a range of forest treatments can change the magnitude and frequency of all peakflows on record and how such effects can increase with increasing event size as a consequence of changes to the peakflow frequency distribution. Changes to the distribution’s mean (−0.2 to +47.4 %) and variance (−30.9 to +162.1 %) resulted in a range of effects from no significant impacts on peakflows to making larger peakflows becoming even larger (up to 105 % increase) and more frequent (up to 18 times more frequent). Changes to peakflows are attributed to treatment-induced suppression of evapotranspiration and changes to non-vegetative factors, which can alter the soil storage capacity, moisture available for runoff, and the efficiency of runoff arriving to the outlet. The dominant topographical aspect of the watershed, seasonal differences in storm types, extent to which the storm events are in-phase or out-of-phase with high antecedent soil moisture, and lagged runoff responses with watershed memory emerged as key indicators of the sensitivity of peakflows to forest treatment. The application of the stochastic framework in forest hydrology can help fully understand forest treatment – peakflows relations.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Hydrology publishes original research papers and comprehensive reviews in all the subfields of the hydrological sciences including water based management and policy issues that impact on economics and society. These comprise, but are not limited to the physical, chemical, biogeochemical, stochastic and systems aspects of surface and groundwater hydrology, hydrometeorology and hydrogeology. Relevant topics incorporating the insights and methodologies of disciplines such as climatology, water resource systems, hydraulics, agrohydrology, geomorphology, soil science, instrumentation and remote sensing, civil and environmental engineering are included. Social science perspectives on hydrological problems such as resource and ecological economics, environmental sociology, psychology and behavioural science, management and policy analysis are also invited. Multi-and interdisciplinary analyses of hydrological problems are within scope. The science published in the Journal of Hydrology is relevant to catchment scales rather than exclusively to a local scale or site.