Effect of blue-filtering lens spectacles on signs and symptoms of dry eye during exposure to a digital screen.

IF 2.4
Akarapon Watcharapalakorn, Teera Poyomtip, Noppadol Srisurattanamethakul, Thitika Kohmarn, Chotika Poolsanam, Patarakorn Tawonkasiwattanakun
{"title":"Effect of blue-filtering lens spectacles on signs and symptoms of dry eye during exposure to a digital screen.","authors":"Akarapon Watcharapalakorn, Teera Poyomtip, Noppadol Srisurattanamethakul, Thitika Kohmarn, Chotika Poolsanam, Patarakorn Tawonkasiwattanakun","doi":"10.1111/opo.13543","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Digital device tasks emit blue light, which may cause damage to the ocular surface, resulting in dry eyes. This study compared lenses with blue-blocking filters, anti-reflective-coated CR39 lenses and uncoated CR39 lenses with regard to their effect on dry eye signs and symptoms during a 120-min reading task from a digital device.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This randomised crossover study included adults from an optometry clinic in Thailand. Twenty-six healthy participants (age, 21.7 ± 2.6 years) performed three reading tasks from a tablet for 3 days. The effects of the spectacles were explored by determining the differences in the mean values between pre- and post-task measurements.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant changes in dry eye symptoms were observed in the 5-Item Dry Eye Questionnaire or Ocular Surface Disease Index compared with the three lenses (p = 0.97 and 0.45, respectively). For dry eye signs, no significant differences in the mean values of tear meniscus height, non-invasive tear breakup time (keratometry mires) or fluorescence tear breakup time were found using the Friedman test (right eye: p = 0.53, 0.93 and 0.44, respectively; left eye: p = 0.53, 0.44 and 0.85, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Lenses with blue-blocking filters did not alleviate dry eye signs and symptoms during a 120-min digital activity.</p>","PeriodicalId":520731,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/opo.13543","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Digital device tasks emit blue light, which may cause damage to the ocular surface, resulting in dry eyes. This study compared lenses with blue-blocking filters, anti-reflective-coated CR39 lenses and uncoated CR39 lenses with regard to their effect on dry eye signs and symptoms during a 120-min reading task from a digital device.

Methods: This randomised crossover study included adults from an optometry clinic in Thailand. Twenty-six healthy participants (age, 21.7 ± 2.6 years) performed three reading tasks from a tablet for 3 days. The effects of the spectacles were explored by determining the differences in the mean values between pre- and post-task measurements.

Results: No significant changes in dry eye symptoms were observed in the 5-Item Dry Eye Questionnaire or Ocular Surface Disease Index compared with the three lenses (p = 0.97 and 0.45, respectively). For dry eye signs, no significant differences in the mean values of tear meniscus height, non-invasive tear breakup time (keratometry mires) or fluorescence tear breakup time were found using the Friedman test (right eye: p = 0.53, 0.93 and 0.44, respectively; left eye: p = 0.53, 0.44 and 0.85, respectively).

Conclusions: Lenses with blue-blocking filters did not alleviate dry eye signs and symptoms during a 120-min digital activity.

蓝光滤光镜对数码屏幕前干眼症的影响。
用途:数码设备任务会发出蓝光,蓝光可能对眼表造成损伤,导致眼睛干涩。在120分钟的数字设备阅读任务中,本研究比较了蓝阻滤镜镜片、抗反射涂层CR39镜片和未涂层CR39镜片对干眼症状和体征的影响。方法:这项随机交叉研究纳入了泰国一家验光诊所的成年人。26名健康参与者(年龄21.7±2.6岁)在3天内通过平板电脑完成3项阅读任务。眼镜的影响是通过确定任务前和任务后测量值的平均值的差异来探索的。结果:与三种隐形眼镜相比,5项干眼问卷和眼表疾病指数的干眼症状无明显变化(p分别为0.97和0.45)。对于干眼症状,使用Friedman检验发现泪液半月板高度、无创泪液破裂时间(角膜测量法)或荧光泪液破裂时间的平均值无显著差异(右眼:p分别= 0.53、0.93和0.44;左眼:p分别= 0.53、0.44、0.85)。结论:在120分钟的数字活动期间,带有蓝色阻隔滤光片的镜片并没有缓解干眼症状和体征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信