Comparison of Local Subcutaneous Infiltration with Ropivacaine Alone and Two Different Doses of Dexmedetomidine Plus Ropivacaine for Postoperative Pain after Cesarean Section Under Spinal Anesthesia.

IF 0.7 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Advanced biomedical research Pub Date : 2025-05-31 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.4103/abr.abr_253_24
Atefeh Ghosouri, Alireza Hoghooghy, Azim Honarmand, Arefeh Kabirzadeh
{"title":"Comparison of Local Subcutaneous Infiltration with Ropivacaine Alone and Two Different Doses of Dexmedetomidine Plus Ropivacaine for Postoperative Pain after Cesarean Section Under Spinal Anesthesia.","authors":"Atefeh Ghosouri, Alireza Hoghooghy, Azim Honarmand, Arefeh Kabirzadeh","doi":"10.4103/abr.abr_253_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In a cesarean section (CS), good postoperative pain management is of great importance. We assessed the effect of adding dexmedetomidine to ropivacaine 0.5% in CS patients with spinal anesthesia to assess its ability to enhance pain management.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This was a randomized controlled trial in Shahid Beheshti Hospital between 2022 and 2023 with the goal of assessing ropivacaine efficacy with and without dexmedetomidine on pain control after a CS. Spinal anesthesia was administered for all patients by using bupivacaine 0.5%. Before wound closure, patients were treated with analgesics. Group A received dexmedetomidine 1 µg/kg infiltrated subcutaneously, followed by ropivacaine 0.5% 3 mg/kg diluted with normal saline to 40 cc. Group B received dexmedetomidine 2 µg/kg, followed by ropivacaine 0.5% 3 mg/kg. The control group received ropivacaine 0.5% 3 mg/kg. A <i>P</i> value of < 0.05was regarded as significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study groups exhibited significantly lower visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores. Specifically, group A showed significantly lower VAS scores than the controls, and group B also showed significantly lower VAS scores than group A. The VAS score after 24 hours of CS was, on average, 2.13 (SD = 0.16, 95% CI = [1.74, 2.52]) lower in group B compared to the control group and 1.1 (SD = 0.16, 95% CI = [0.71, 1.49]) lower than in group A (<i>P</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Subcutaneous infiltration of dexmedetomidine with ropivacaine improves postoperative pain management more effectively than using ropivacaine alone. It is noteworthy that dexmedetomidine 2 µg/kg can improve pain after a CS more effectively than 1 µg/kg.</p>","PeriodicalId":94292,"journal":{"name":"Advanced biomedical research","volume":"14 ","pages":"52"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12165305/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advanced biomedical research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/abr.abr_253_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In a cesarean section (CS), good postoperative pain management is of great importance. We assessed the effect of adding dexmedetomidine to ropivacaine 0.5% in CS patients with spinal anesthesia to assess its ability to enhance pain management.

Materials and methods: This was a randomized controlled trial in Shahid Beheshti Hospital between 2022 and 2023 with the goal of assessing ropivacaine efficacy with and without dexmedetomidine on pain control after a CS. Spinal anesthesia was administered for all patients by using bupivacaine 0.5%. Before wound closure, patients were treated with analgesics. Group A received dexmedetomidine 1 µg/kg infiltrated subcutaneously, followed by ropivacaine 0.5% 3 mg/kg diluted with normal saline to 40 cc. Group B received dexmedetomidine 2 µg/kg, followed by ropivacaine 0.5% 3 mg/kg. The control group received ropivacaine 0.5% 3 mg/kg. A P value of < 0.05was regarded as significant.

Results: The study groups exhibited significantly lower visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores. Specifically, group A showed significantly lower VAS scores than the controls, and group B also showed significantly lower VAS scores than group A. The VAS score after 24 hours of CS was, on average, 2.13 (SD = 0.16, 95% CI = [1.74, 2.52]) lower in group B compared to the control group and 1.1 (SD = 0.16, 95% CI = [0.71, 1.49]) lower than in group A (P < 0.05).

Conclusions: Subcutaneous infiltration of dexmedetomidine with ropivacaine improves postoperative pain management more effectively than using ropivacaine alone. It is noteworthy that dexmedetomidine 2 µg/kg can improve pain after a CS more effectively than 1 µg/kg.

单用罗哌卡因与两种不同剂量右美托咪定加罗哌卡因局部皮下浸润治疗腰麻剖宫产术后疼痛的比较。
背景:在剖宫产术中,良好的术后疼痛管理是非常重要的。我们评估了将右美托咪定加入0.5%罗哌卡因对脊髓麻醉CS患者的效果,以评估其增强疼痛管理的能力。材料和方法:这是一项于2022年至2023年在Shahid Beheshti医院进行的随机对照试验,目的是评估罗哌卡因加和不加右美托咪定对CS后疼痛控制的疗效。所有患者均采用0.5%布比卡因进行脊髓麻醉。在伤口闭合前,患者使用镇痛药治疗。A组患者给予右美托咪定1µg/kg皮下浸润,随后用生理盐水稀释至40cc的罗哌卡因0.5% 3mg /kg, B组患者给予右美托咪定2µg/kg,随后给予罗哌卡因0.5% 3mg /kg。对照组给予罗哌卡因0.5% 3 mg/kg。P值< 0.05为显著性。结果:实验组的视觉模拟评分(VAS)疼痛评分明显降低。其中,A组VAS评分明显低于对照组,B组VAS评分也明显低于A组。CS治疗24 h后,B组VAS评分平均比对照组低2.13分(SD = 0.16, 95% CI =[1.74, 2.52]),比A组低1.1分(SD = 0.16, 95% CI =[0.71, 1.49]),差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结论:右美托咪定联合罗哌卡因皮下浸润比单独使用罗哌卡因更有效地改善了术后疼痛管理。值得注意的是,右美托咪定2µg/kg比1µg/kg更有效地改善CS术后疼痛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信