[Clinical recommendations in clinical biology protocols : application to clinical chemistry].

Revue medicale de Liege Pub Date : 2025-05-01
Marion Janssen, Aurélie Ladang, Romy Gadisseur, Laurence Lutteri, Caroline Le Goff, Étienne Cavalier
{"title":"[Clinical recommendations in clinical biology protocols : application to clinical chemistry].","authors":"Marion Janssen, Aurélie Ladang, Romy Gadisseur, Laurence Lutteri, Caroline Le Goff, Étienne Cavalier","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The interpretation of laboratory results traditionally relies on comparison with reference values or clinical recommendations. Reference values are established from a population considered «healthy», while clinical recommendations come from epidemiological studies or expert consensus. Recommendations represent a more personalized approach compared to reference values, as they take into account various criteria such as the patient's pathophysiological condition, risk factors, etc. It is important to understand the process of developing recommendations and reference values and to be aware of their potential limitations to ensure appropriate clinical application. The aim of this work is to illustrate, through concrete examples, the use of clinical recommendations or reference values and their limitations.</p>","PeriodicalId":94201,"journal":{"name":"Revue medicale de Liege","volume":"80 5-6","pages":"296-300"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revue medicale de Liege","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The interpretation of laboratory results traditionally relies on comparison with reference values or clinical recommendations. Reference values are established from a population considered «healthy», while clinical recommendations come from epidemiological studies or expert consensus. Recommendations represent a more personalized approach compared to reference values, as they take into account various criteria such as the patient's pathophysiological condition, risk factors, etc. It is important to understand the process of developing recommendations and reference values and to be aware of their potential limitations to ensure appropriate clinical application. The aim of this work is to illustrate, through concrete examples, the use of clinical recommendations or reference values and their limitations.

[临床生物学方案中的临床建议:在临床化学中的应用]。
对实验室结果的解释传统上依赖于与参考值或临床建议的比较。参考值是根据被认为是“健康”的人群确定的,而临床建议来自流行病学研究或专家共识。与参考值相比,推荐值是一种更加个性化的方法,因为它们考虑了各种标准,如患者的病理生理状况、危险因素等。重要的是要了解制定建议和参考值的过程,并意识到其潜在的局限性,以确保适当的临床应用。这项工作的目的是通过具体的例子来说明临床建议或参考价值的使用及其局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信