Effectiveness and safety of dual therapy with co-packaged dolutegravir and lamivudine compared to triple therapy as switching strategy in clinical practice.

IF 2.2
Diego Cecchini, Edgardo Bottaro, Brenda Bacelar, Ángeles Tisné, Claudia Migazzi, Macarena Roel, Maximiliano Bergman, Isabel Cassetti
{"title":"Effectiveness and safety of dual therapy with co-packaged dolutegravir and lamivudine compared to triple therapy as switching strategy in clinical practice.","authors":"Diego Cecchini, Edgardo Bottaro, Brenda Bacelar, Ángeles Tisné, Claudia Migazzi, Macarena Roel, Maximiliano Bergman, Isabel Cassetti","doi":"10.37201/req/030.2025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Dolutegravir plus lamivudine (DTG/3TC) dual therapy has demonstrated efficacy in HIV treatment, but access remains challenging in Latin America. Argentina approved a generic co-packaged DTG+3TC presentation to improve accessibility. This study evaluated the effectiveness and safety of co-packed DTG/3TC compared to DTG-based triple therapy in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective observational cohort study conducted between October 2019 and November 2023 at a reference HIV center in Argentina. Treatment-experienced people living with HIV (PLWH) with viral suppression who switched to either co-packaged DTG/3TC or DTG-based triple therapy were included. Primary outcomes included persistence, virologic suppression rates (VSR), and safety at 6, 12, and 18 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 599 PLWH, 245 (41%) switched to dual therapy and 354 (59%) to triple therapy. Persistence rates for dual therapy at 6, 12, and 18 months were 99%, 100% and 98%; for triple therapy: 99%, 97% and 97%, respectively. VSR for dual therapy were 99%, 98% and 99%; for triple therapy: 99%, 97% and 98% at the same timepoints. Adverse event rates were low in both groups: dual therapy (0.5%, 0%, 0.8% at 6, 12, 18 months) and triple therapy (1.2%, 0.7%, 0.4% at 6, 12, 18 months).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Co-packaged DTG/3TC demonstrated high persistence and virologic suppression rates with a favorable safety profile in clinical practice. Its effectiveness and safety were comparable to DTG-based triple therapy, supporting its use as a cost-effective alternative for treatment-experienced PLWH in resource-limited settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":94198,"journal":{"name":"Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia","volume":" ","pages":"386-393"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12447303/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37201/req/030.2025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Dolutegravir plus lamivudine (DTG/3TC) dual therapy has demonstrated efficacy in HIV treatment, but access remains challenging in Latin America. Argentina approved a generic co-packaged DTG+3TC presentation to improve accessibility. This study evaluated the effectiveness and safety of co-packed DTG/3TC compared to DTG-based triple therapy in clinical practice.

Materials and methods: A retrospective observational cohort study conducted between October 2019 and November 2023 at a reference HIV center in Argentina. Treatment-experienced people living with HIV (PLWH) with viral suppression who switched to either co-packaged DTG/3TC or DTG-based triple therapy were included. Primary outcomes included persistence, virologic suppression rates (VSR), and safety at 6, 12, and 18 months.

Results: Of 599 PLWH, 245 (41%) switched to dual therapy and 354 (59%) to triple therapy. Persistence rates for dual therapy at 6, 12, and 18 months were 99%, 100% and 98%; for triple therapy: 99%, 97% and 97%, respectively. VSR for dual therapy were 99%, 98% and 99%; for triple therapy: 99%, 97% and 98% at the same timepoints. Adverse event rates were low in both groups: dual therapy (0.5%, 0%, 0.8% at 6, 12, 18 months) and triple therapy (1.2%, 0.7%, 0.4% at 6, 12, 18 months).

Conclusions: Co-packaged DTG/3TC demonstrated high persistence and virologic suppression rates with a favorable safety profile in clinical practice. Its effectiveness and safety were comparable to DTG-based triple therapy, supporting its use as a cost-effective alternative for treatment-experienced PLWH in resource-limited settings.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

在临床实践中,与三联治疗作为转换策略相比,多替格拉韦和拉米夫定复合治疗的有效性和安全性。
Dolutegravir +拉米夫定(DTG/3TC)双重疗法已被证明对HIV治疗有效,但在拉丁美洲获得仍然具有挑战性。阿根廷批准了一种通用的共包装DTG+3TC演示,以改善可及性。本研究在临床实践中比较了DTG/3TC共包装与DTG为基础的三联疗法的有效性和安全性。材料和方法:2019年10月至2023年11月在阿根廷HIV参考中心进行的回顾性观察队列研究。治疗经验丰富的病毒抑制HIV感染者(PLWH)转换为共包装DTG/3TC或基于DTG的三联治疗。主要结局包括6、12和18个月时的持久性、病毒学抑制率(VSR)和安全性。结果:在599例PLWH中,245例(41%)转为双药治疗,354例(59%)转为三联治疗。双重治疗在6、12和18个月的持续率分别为99%、100%和98%;三联疗法:分别为99%、97%和97%。双重治疗的VSR分别为99%、98%和99%;三联疗法:同一时间点的99%,97%和98%。两组不良事件发生率均较低:双重治疗(6、12、18个月时分别为0.5%、0%、0.8%)和三联治疗(6、12、18个月时分别为1.2%、0.7%、0.4%)。结论:共包装DTG/3TC在临床实践中具有较高的持久性和病毒学抑制率,且具有良好的安全性。其有效性和安全性与基于dtg的三联疗法相当,支持其作为资源有限环境中治疗经验丰富的PLWH的成本效益替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信