Load-Bearing Capacity of All-Ceramic Fixed Partial Dentures - Do In Vitro Tests Overestimate Strength?

IF 1.8
K J Erdelt, J Schweiger, M Bäumer, D Edelhoff, O Schubert
{"title":"Load-Bearing Capacity of All-Ceramic Fixed Partial Dentures - Do In Vitro Tests Overestimate Strength?","authors":"K J Erdelt, J Schweiger, M Bäumer, D Edelhoff, O Schubert","doi":"10.11607/ijp.9375","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the impact of the testing model on the load-bearing capacity of monolithic zirconia three-unit fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) and to discuss its implications for transferring in vitro results to clinical reality.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Thirty-two CAD- designed three-unit FDPs milled from zirconia were resin-bonded to four different types of die models (n=8 each): PM (models made from PMMA); FR (fiberglass-reinforced polymer models), NP (CoCr-alloy models), and TM (tooth mobility simulation models). Load-to- failure testing was performed, and data were analyzed (P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results/conclusion: </strong>The mean fracture values were 1676 ± 210 MPa in group TM, 1820 ± 203 MPa in group PM, 2266 ± 138 MPa in group FR, and 4847 ± 496 MPa in group NP. All direct pairwise comparisons, except for TM and PM, showed significant differences. The results suggest that the nature of the underlying model has significant impact on the fracture values of all-ceramic FDPs in in vitro testing. Therefore, the validity of in-vitro tests regarding clinical relevance must be questioned, emphasizing the necessity of a close-to-reality and highly standardized testing method.</p>","PeriodicalId":94232,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of prosthodontics","volume":"0 0","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of prosthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.9375","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the impact of the testing model on the load-bearing capacity of monolithic zirconia three-unit fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) and to discuss its implications for transferring in vitro results to clinical reality.

Materials and methods: Thirty-two CAD- designed three-unit FDPs milled from zirconia were resin-bonded to four different types of die models (n=8 each): PM (models made from PMMA); FR (fiberglass-reinforced polymer models), NP (CoCr-alloy models), and TM (tooth mobility simulation models). Load-to- failure testing was performed, and data were analyzed (P < 0.05).

Results/conclusion: The mean fracture values were 1676 ± 210 MPa in group TM, 1820 ± 203 MPa in group PM, 2266 ± 138 MPa in group FR, and 4847 ± 496 MPa in group NP. All direct pairwise comparisons, except for TM and PM, showed significant differences. The results suggest that the nature of the underlying model has significant impact on the fracture values of all-ceramic FDPs in in vitro testing. Therefore, the validity of in-vitro tests regarding clinical relevance must be questioned, emphasizing the necessity of a close-to-reality and highly standardized testing method.

全瓷固定局部义齿的承载能力——体外试验是否高估了强度?
目的:评估测试模型对整体氧化锆三单元固定修复体(fdp)承载能力的影响,并探讨其对将体外结果转化为临床实际的意义。材料和方法:将32个CAD设计的由氧化锆磨成的三单元fdp树脂粘接到四种不同类型的模具模型上(每种模型n=8): PM(由PMMA制成的模型);FR(玻璃纤维增强聚合物模型),NP (cocr合金模型)和TM(牙齿移动模拟模型)。进行负载-失效试验,并对数据进行分析(P < 0.05)。结果/结论:TM组平均骨折值为1676±210 MPa, PM组为1820±203 MPa, FR组为2266±138 MPa, NP组为4847±496 MPa。除TM和PM外,其他直接两两比较均有显著差异。结果表明,在体外测试中,基础模型的性质对全陶瓷fdp的断裂值有显著影响。因此,体外试验在临床相关性方面的有效性必须受到质疑,强调一种接近现实和高度标准化的测试方法的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信