Effect of Cutting and Rescanning Methods on Trueness and Mesh Density of Digital Intraoral Scans.

IF 1.8
Neslihan Güntekin, Sema Ateşalp İleri, Mehmet Gözen
{"title":"Effect of Cutting and Rescanning Methods on Trueness and Mesh Density of Digital Intraoral Scans.","authors":"Neslihan Güntekin, Sema Ateşalp İleri, Mehmet Gözen","doi":"10.11607/ijp.9383","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the effects of different cutting and rescanning methods on the trueness of digital impressions and mesh density. In particular, the contribution of the high definition (HD) rescanning mode to scanning results was analyzed.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The fully dentate model with a prepared mandibular right first molar was scanned using a reference scanner. The main model was repeatedly scanned with Trios 3 (T) and Medit i700 (M; T0, M0). Two copies of each scan were obtained. The crown region of the mandibular right first molar was cut and rescanned in standard resolution (T1, M1) and high resolution (T2, M2). The digital data were analyzed using CloudCompare and Meshlab software. Trueness was assessed based on RMS values obtained from 3D comparisons with the reference model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>While no significant differences were observed in the RMS values of full-arch scans, significant differences were found in crown RMS values (P < .001). T0 (29.03 μm) exhibited lower deviation compared to M0 (33.89 μm). M2 (29.29 μm) showed a significantly lower RMS value than M0 (33.89 μm). No significant differences were found between T0 (29.03 μm), T1 (29.28 μm), and T2 (27.22 μm). Significantly higher mesh density was detected in the M1 and M2 groups compared to the others (M1 = 42,170, M2 = 42,956).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Rescanning methods may affect scanning accuracy and mesh density. Specifically, the high-resolution mode of the Medit i700 has the potential to provide better accuracy and detail in localized areas.</p>","PeriodicalId":94232,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of prosthodontics","volume":"0 0","pages":"607-614"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of prosthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.9383","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the effects of different cutting and rescanning methods on the trueness of digital impressions and mesh density. In particular, the contribution of the high definition (HD) rescanning mode to scanning results was analyzed.

Materials and methods: The fully dentate model with a prepared mandibular right first molar was scanned using a reference scanner. The main model was repeatedly scanned with Trios 3 (T) and Medit i700 (M; T0, M0). Two copies of each scan were obtained. The crown region of the mandibular right first molar was cut and rescanned in standard resolution (T1, M1) and high resolution (T2, M2). The digital data were analyzed using CloudCompare and Meshlab software. Trueness was assessed based on RMS values obtained from 3D comparisons with the reference model.

Results: While no significant differences were observed in the RMS values of full-arch scans, significant differences were found in crown RMS values (P < .001). T0 (29.03 μm) exhibited lower deviation compared to M0 (33.89 μm). M2 (29.29 μm) showed a significantly lower RMS value than M0 (33.89 μm). No significant differences were found between T0 (29.03 μm), T1 (29.28 μm), and T2 (27.22 μm). Significantly higher mesh density was detected in the M1 and M2 groups compared to the others (M1 = 42,170, M2 = 42,956).

Conclusions: Rescanning methods may affect scanning accuracy and mesh density. Specifically, the high-resolution mode of the Medit i700 has the potential to provide better accuracy and detail in localized areas.

切割和重扫描方法对数字口内扫描准确性和网格密度的影响。
目的:本研究的目的是评估不同切割和重扫描方法对数字印痕真实感和网格密度的影响。特别分析了高清重扫描模式对扫描结果的贡献。材料与方法:采用参考扫描仪对制备好的46号牙的全齿状模型进行扫描。主模型用Trios 3 (T)和Medit i700 (M) (T0, M0)反复扫描。每次扫描得到两份拷贝。对46号牙冠区进行标准分辨率(T1、M1)和高分辨率(T2、M2)扫描。使用CloudCompare和Meshlab软件对数字数据进行分析。根据与参考模型的三维比较获得的RMS值来评估真实性。结果:虽然全弓扫描的RMS值无显著差异,但冠的RMS值有显著差异(p < 0.001)。与M0(33.89µm)相比,T0(29.03µm)的偏差较小。M2(29.29µm)的均方根值显著低于M0(33.89µm)。T0(29.03µm)、T1(29.28µm)和T2(27.22µm)之间无显著差异。M1和M2组的网孔密度明显高于其他组(M1 = 42,170, M2 = 42,956)。结论:重扫描方法会影响扫描精度和网格密度。具体来说,Medit i700的高分辨率模式有可能在局部区域提供更好的准确性和细节。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信