Identification of Factors Predicting False-Negative Results in Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Breast Cancer: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.

IF 1.3 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Cureus Pub Date : 2025-06-12 eCollection Date: 2025-06-01 DOI:10.7759/cureus.85891
Sümeyra Bölük, Salih Bölük
{"title":"Identification of Factors Predicting False-Negative Results in Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Breast Cancer: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.","authors":"Sümeyra Bölük, Salih Bölük","doi":"10.7759/cureus.85891","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background In breast cancer surgery, sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is routinely utilized for axillary assessment. Frozen section examination of the sentinel lymph node (SLN) is used to guide the decision for axillary dissection. Adjuvant treatment is also planned based on the final pathological examination of the axilla and the mastectomy/breast-conserving surgery specimen. In rare cases, even when the frozen section examination of the SLN is negative, micrometastases and macrometastases can still be detected in the final pathologic examination. In our study, we aimed to analyze the characteristics of patients who underwent surgery for breast cancer and were found to have false-negative results in SLNB. We aimed to identify potential predictive markers for false-negative results in SLNB. Methodology A total of 206 patients with breast cancer who underwent surgery in our department between January 2018 and September 2023 were evaluated retrospectively. In total, 12 patients with false-negative SLNB results and 12 patients with true-negative SLNB results were reviewed. Demographic information of the patients, type of breast malignancy, hormone receptor status, the number of lymph nodes dissected in SLN sampling, and whether the patients received neoadjuvant treatment were recorded. Results The results of 12 cases with false-negative results in SLNB were compared with 12 cases with true-negative results. The ages of the cases ranged from 33 to 80 years, and the mean age was 57.00 ± 12.55 years. The mean age was 59.92 ± 9.72 years in the group with false-negative SLNB results and 54.08 ± 14.71 in the group with true-negative SLNB results. No significant difference was found between the groups (p > 0.05). No statistically significant difference was determined in tumor size, stage, estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor (PR), C-ERB, HER-2, and E-cadherin between the groups (p > 0.05). It is noteworthy that PR was detected at a higher rate in the false-negative SLNB group. In cases with false-negative results in SLNB, the absence of treatment response in the postoperative pathological examination was found to be statistically significantly higher. On the other hand, complete response and partial response rates were significantly higher in the SLNB true-negative group (p = 0.011 and p < 0.05). However, because response rates cannot be assessed preoperatively, they cannot be considered a predictive factor. Mean Ki-67 (%) of the cases with true-negative SLNB results was statistically significantly higher than the false-negative group (p = 0.017 and p < 0.05). Conclusions SLNB is routinely performed in breast cancer for the evaluation of the axilla. Examining a single blue-stained lymph node may be sufficient for SLN assessment. In the preoperative period, there is no imaging method, pathological finding, or data that can definitively predict the probability of a positive SLN. Even when the patient has received neoadjuvant therapy, unnecessary lymph node dissection should be avoided during SLN sampling.</p>","PeriodicalId":93960,"journal":{"name":"Cureus","volume":"17 6","pages":"e85891"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12165741/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cureus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.85891","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background In breast cancer surgery, sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is routinely utilized for axillary assessment. Frozen section examination of the sentinel lymph node (SLN) is used to guide the decision for axillary dissection. Adjuvant treatment is also planned based on the final pathological examination of the axilla and the mastectomy/breast-conserving surgery specimen. In rare cases, even when the frozen section examination of the SLN is negative, micrometastases and macrometastases can still be detected in the final pathologic examination. In our study, we aimed to analyze the characteristics of patients who underwent surgery for breast cancer and were found to have false-negative results in SLNB. We aimed to identify potential predictive markers for false-negative results in SLNB. Methodology A total of 206 patients with breast cancer who underwent surgery in our department between January 2018 and September 2023 were evaluated retrospectively. In total, 12 patients with false-negative SLNB results and 12 patients with true-negative SLNB results were reviewed. Demographic information of the patients, type of breast malignancy, hormone receptor status, the number of lymph nodes dissected in SLN sampling, and whether the patients received neoadjuvant treatment were recorded. Results The results of 12 cases with false-negative results in SLNB were compared with 12 cases with true-negative results. The ages of the cases ranged from 33 to 80 years, and the mean age was 57.00 ± 12.55 years. The mean age was 59.92 ± 9.72 years in the group with false-negative SLNB results and 54.08 ± 14.71 in the group with true-negative SLNB results. No significant difference was found between the groups (p > 0.05). No statistically significant difference was determined in tumor size, stage, estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor (PR), C-ERB, HER-2, and E-cadherin between the groups (p > 0.05). It is noteworthy that PR was detected at a higher rate in the false-negative SLNB group. In cases with false-negative results in SLNB, the absence of treatment response in the postoperative pathological examination was found to be statistically significantly higher. On the other hand, complete response and partial response rates were significantly higher in the SLNB true-negative group (p = 0.011 and p < 0.05). However, because response rates cannot be assessed preoperatively, they cannot be considered a predictive factor. Mean Ki-67 (%) of the cases with true-negative SLNB results was statistically significantly higher than the false-negative group (p = 0.017 and p < 0.05). Conclusions SLNB is routinely performed in breast cancer for the evaluation of the axilla. Examining a single blue-stained lymph node may be sufficient for SLN assessment. In the preoperative period, there is no imaging method, pathological finding, or data that can definitively predict the probability of a positive SLN. Even when the patient has received neoadjuvant therapy, unnecessary lymph node dissection should be avoided during SLN sampling.

乳腺癌手术患者前哨淋巴结活检假阴性预测因素的识别:一项单中心回顾性研究
背景在乳腺癌手术中,前哨淋巴结活检(SLNB)通常用于腋窝评估。前哨淋巴结冰冻切片检查(SLN)用于指导腋窝清扫的决定。辅助治疗也根据最终的腋窝病理检查和乳房切除/保乳手术标本计划。在极少数情况下,即使SLN冷冻切片检查为阴性,最终病理检查仍可发现微转移和大转移。在我们的研究中,我们的目的是分析接受乳腺癌手术并发现SLNB结果为假阴性的患者的特征。我们的目的是确定SLNB假阴性结果的潜在预测标记。方法回顾性分析2018年1月至2023年9月在我科接受手术治疗的206例乳腺癌患者。总共回顾了12例SLNB假阴性患者和12例SLNB真阴性患者。记录患者的人口统计学信息、乳腺恶性肿瘤类型、激素受体状态、SLN取样淋巴结清扫数、患者是否接受新辅助治疗。结果将12例SLNB假阴性结果与12例真阴性结果进行比较。年龄33 ~ 80岁,平均年龄57.00±12.55岁。SLNB假阴性组平均年龄为59.92±9.72岁,SLNB真阴性组平均年龄为54.08±14.71岁。各组间差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。两组间肿瘤大小、分期、雌激素受体、孕激素受体(PR)、C-ERB、HER-2、E-cadherin比较,差异均无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。值得注意的是,假阴性SLNB组PR的检出率更高。在SLNB假阴性的病例中,术后病理检查治疗无反应的比例有统计学意义更高。另一方面,SLNB真阴性组的完全缓解率和部分缓解率均显著高于对照组(p = 0.011和p < 0.05)。然而,由于术前不能评估有效率,因此不能将其视为预测因素。SLNB真阴性组平均Ki-67(%)显著高于假阴性组(p = 0.017, p < 0.05)。结论SLNB是乳腺癌腋窝评估的常规方法。检查单个蓝色染色的淋巴结可能足以对SLN进行评估。在术前,没有影像学方法、病理发现或数据可以明确预测SLN阳性的概率。即使患者接受了新辅助治疗,在SLN取样时也应避免不必要的淋巴结清扫。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信