Rethinking Lower Extremity Limb Dominance: A Comparison of Performance-Based and Self-Selected Measures.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES
Anne Leung, Julie Dyke, Ryan Zarzycki, J Todd Lawrence, Theodore Ganley, Elliot Greenberg
{"title":"Rethinking Lower Extremity Limb Dominance: A Comparison of Performance-Based and Self-Selected Measures.","authors":"Anne Leung, Julie Dyke, Ryan Zarzycki, J Todd Lawrence, Theodore Ganley, Elliot Greenberg","doi":"10.1177/19417381251343085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Limb dominance implies preferential or asymmetrical performance between limbs. There is currently no consensus regarding limb dominance definition for the lower extremity. Previous work described several methods of subjective reporting for lower extremity limb dominance; however, the correlation between objective performance and subjective perception of limb dominance is poorly understood, particularly among adolescent athletes. The purpose of this study was to test the agreement between objective performance and self-selected limb dominance in 3 different single-leg hopping tasks.</p><p><strong>Hypothesis: </strong>There will be a positive association between self-selected limb dominance and objective performance.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Cross-sectional cohort study.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level 3.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Self-selected limb dominance was determined by asking, \"Which leg would you use to kick a ball as far as you could?\" Participants performed a series of single-leg hops, and 3-trial means of the single hop (SH), timed hop (TH), and vertical hop (VH) were used for analysis. Paired samples <i>t</i> test or Wilcoxon-signed rank test identified differences in limb performance for each hop test. Chi-square analysis evaluated associations between self-selected limb dominance and objective performance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 352 healthy youth athletes (55% male; mean age, 11.1 ± 1.7 years) participated. There was a small statistically significant difference between limbs on all hop tests. Chi-square analysis revealed no associations (<i>P</i> > 0.05) between self-selected limb dominance and objective performance across all hop test constructs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A single limb performed better on all hop tests by a small and not clinically relevant difference. Perceived limb dominance did not predict performance regardless of hopping task.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Symmetrical performance on the SH, TH, and VH is normal in uninjured athletes. When returning injured athletes to sport, clinicians should aim for restoring hop test symmetry regardless of whether the injured limb is the perceived dominant limb.</p>","PeriodicalId":54276,"journal":{"name":"Sports Health-A Multidisciplinary Approach","volume":" ","pages":"19417381251343085"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12171090/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports Health-A Multidisciplinary Approach","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19417381251343085","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Limb dominance implies preferential or asymmetrical performance between limbs. There is currently no consensus regarding limb dominance definition for the lower extremity. Previous work described several methods of subjective reporting for lower extremity limb dominance; however, the correlation between objective performance and subjective perception of limb dominance is poorly understood, particularly among adolescent athletes. The purpose of this study was to test the agreement between objective performance and self-selected limb dominance in 3 different single-leg hopping tasks.

Hypothesis: There will be a positive association between self-selected limb dominance and objective performance.

Study design: Cross-sectional cohort study.

Level of evidence: Level 3.

Methods: Self-selected limb dominance was determined by asking, "Which leg would you use to kick a ball as far as you could?" Participants performed a series of single-leg hops, and 3-trial means of the single hop (SH), timed hop (TH), and vertical hop (VH) were used for analysis. Paired samples t test or Wilcoxon-signed rank test identified differences in limb performance for each hop test. Chi-square analysis evaluated associations between self-selected limb dominance and objective performance.

Results: A total of 352 healthy youth athletes (55% male; mean age, 11.1 ± 1.7 years) participated. There was a small statistically significant difference between limbs on all hop tests. Chi-square analysis revealed no associations (P > 0.05) between self-selected limb dominance and objective performance across all hop test constructs.

Conclusion: A single limb performed better on all hop tests by a small and not clinically relevant difference. Perceived limb dominance did not predict performance regardless of hopping task.

Clinical relevance: Symmetrical performance on the SH, TH, and VH is normal in uninjured athletes. When returning injured athletes to sport, clinicians should aim for restoring hop test symmetry regardless of whether the injured limb is the perceived dominant limb.

重新思考下肢优势:基于性能和自选测量的比较。
背景:肢体优势意味着肢体之间的优先或不对称行为。对于下肢的肢体优势定义,目前尚无共识。先前的工作描述了几种主观报告下肢肢体优势的方法;然而,客观表现与肢体优势的主观感知之间的相关性尚不清楚,特别是在青少年运动员中。本研究的目的是检验3种不同单腿跳跃任务中客观表现与自我选择肢体优势之间的一致性。假设:自我选择肢体优势与客观表现之间存在正相关关系。研究设计:横断面队列研究。证据等级:三级。方法:通过问“你会用哪条腿踢球,踢得越远越好?”参与者进行一系列单腿跳跃,并使用单腿跳跃(SH),定时跳跃(TH)和垂直跳跃(VH)的3次试验方法进行分析。配对样本t检验或wilcoxon符号秩检验确定了每个跳跃测试中肢体表现的差异。卡方分析评估了自我选择肢体优势与客观表现之间的关系。结果:352名健康青少年运动员(男性55%;平均年龄(11.1±1.7岁)。在所有跳跃测试中,四肢之间有统计学上的显着差异。卡方分析显示,在所有跳跃测试结构中,自选肢体优势与客观表现之间没有相关性(P > 0.05)。结论:单肢在所有跳跃试验中表现较好,差异不大且无临床意义。感知肢体优势与跳跃任务无关。临床相关性:在未受伤的运动员中,SH、TH和VH的对称表现是正常的。当受伤的运动员恢复运动时,临床医生应该致力于恢复跳跃测试的对称性,而不管受伤的肢体是否被认为是优势肢体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sports Health-A Multidisciplinary Approach
Sports Health-A Multidisciplinary Approach Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
101
期刊介绍: Sports Health: A Multidisciplinary Approach is an indispensable resource for all medical professionals involved in the training and care of the competitive or recreational athlete, including primary care physicians, orthopaedic surgeons, physical therapists, athletic trainers and other medical and health care professionals. Published bimonthly, Sports Health is a collaborative publication from the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine (AOSSM), the American Medical Society for Sports Medicine (AMSSM), the National Athletic Trainers’ Association (NATA), and the Sports Physical Therapy Section (SPTS). The journal publishes review articles, original research articles, case studies, images, short updates, legal briefs, editorials, and letters to the editor. Topics include: -Sports Injury and Treatment -Care of the Athlete -Athlete Rehabilitation -Medical Issues in the Athlete -Surgical Techniques in Sports Medicine -Case Studies in Sports Medicine -Images in Sports Medicine -Legal Issues -Pediatric Athletes -General Sports Trauma -Sports Psychology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信