Automated identification of older adults at risk for cognitive decline.

IF 4 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Darlene P Floden, Olivia Hogue, Saket A Saxena, Anita D Misra-Hebert, Alex Milinovich, Michael B Rothberg, Elizabeth R Pfoh, Robyn M Busch, Kamini Krishnan, Robert J Fox, Michael W Kattan
{"title":"Automated identification of older adults at risk for cognitive decline.","authors":"Darlene P Floden, Olivia Hogue, Saket A Saxena, Anita D Misra-Hebert, Alex Milinovich, Michael B Rothberg, Elizabeth R Pfoh, Robyn M Busch, Kamini Krishnan, Robert J Fox, Michael W Kattan","doi":"10.1002/dad2.70136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Automated models that predict cognitive risk in older adults can aid decisions about which patients to screen in busy primary care settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective prediction model development study, we conducted formal cognitive testing on 337 older primary care patients to establish cognitive status. We used up to 5 years of prior discrete-field electronic health record (EHR) data to develop a multivariable prediction model that differentiates patients with impaired versus intact cognition.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final model included seven easily extractable variables with known associations to cognitive decline: age, race, pulse, systolic blood pressure, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory use, history of mood disorder, and family history of neurological disease. The model demonstrated good discrimination of cognitive status (concordance statistic = 0.72).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The cognitive risk model may be useful clinically to prompt for objective cognitive screening in high-risk patients. The use of common, discrete variables ensures relative ease of implementation in EHRs.</p><p><strong>Highlights: </strong>337 older primary care patients completed full neuropsychological assessment.Risk modeling used data available in a typical primary care record.The model successfully differentiated patients with/without cognitive impairment.This EHR model offers a passive workflow to identify patients at cognitive risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":53226,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer''s and Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment and Disease Monitoring","volume":"17 2","pages":"e70136"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12162263/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alzheimer''s and Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment and Disease Monitoring","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/dad2.70136","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Automated models that predict cognitive risk in older adults can aid decisions about which patients to screen in busy primary care settings.

Methods: In this retrospective prediction model development study, we conducted formal cognitive testing on 337 older primary care patients to establish cognitive status. We used up to 5 years of prior discrete-field electronic health record (EHR) data to develop a multivariable prediction model that differentiates patients with impaired versus intact cognition.

Results: The final model included seven easily extractable variables with known associations to cognitive decline: age, race, pulse, systolic blood pressure, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory use, history of mood disorder, and family history of neurological disease. The model demonstrated good discrimination of cognitive status (concordance statistic = 0.72).

Discussion: The cognitive risk model may be useful clinically to prompt for objective cognitive screening in high-risk patients. The use of common, discrete variables ensures relative ease of implementation in EHRs.

Highlights: 337 older primary care patients completed full neuropsychological assessment.Risk modeling used data available in a typical primary care record.The model successfully differentiated patients with/without cognitive impairment.This EHR model offers a passive workflow to identify patients at cognitive risk.

老年人认知能力下降风险的自动识别。
导读:预测老年人认知风险的自动化模型可以帮助在繁忙的初级保健机构中决定对哪些患者进行筛查。方法:在回顾性预测模型开发研究中,我们对337例老年初级保健患者进行正式的认知测试,以建立认知状态。我们使用长达5年的先前离散场电子健康记录(EHR)数据来开发一个多变量预测模型,以区分认知受损患者和完整患者。结果:最终模型包括七个容易提取的变量,已知与认知能力下降相关:年龄、种族、脉搏、收缩压、非甾体抗炎使用、情绪障碍史和神经系统疾病家族史。该模型具有较好的认知状态判别性(一致性统计量= 0.72)。讨论:认知风险模型可能有助于临床提示对高危患者进行客观认知筛查。使用通用的离散变量可以确保在电子病历中相对容易地实现。重点:337名老年初级保健患者完成了完整的神经心理评估。风险建模使用了典型初级保健记录中的可用数据。该模型成功区分了认知障碍患者和非认知障碍患者。这种电子病历模型提供了一个被动的工作流程来识别有认知风险的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
7.50%
发文量
101
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Alzheimer''s & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring (DADM) is an open access, peer-reviewed, journal from the Alzheimer''s Association® that will publish new research that reports the discovery, development and validation of instruments, technologies, algorithms, and innovative processes. Papers will cover a range of topics interested in the early and accurate detection of individuals with memory complaints and/or among asymptomatic individuals at elevated risk for various forms of memory disorders. The expectation for published papers will be to translate fundamental knowledge about the neurobiology of the disease into practical reports that describe both the conceptual and methodological aspects of the submitted scientific inquiry. Published topics will explore the development of biomarkers, surrogate markers, and conceptual/methodological challenges. Publication priority will be given to papers that 1) describe putative surrogate markers that accurately track disease progression, 2) biomarkers that fulfill international regulatory requirements, 3) reports from large, well-characterized population-based cohorts that comprise the heterogeneity and diversity of asymptomatic individuals and 4) algorithmic development that considers multi-marker arrays (e.g., integrated-omics, genetics, biofluids, imaging, etc.) and advanced computational analytics and technologies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信