{"title":"Liberal vs restrictive transfusion strategy for acute brain injury: A meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis of randomized clinical trials.","authors":"Wen-Wen Tsai, Jheng-Yan Wu, Kuan-Hsien Lu, Hong-Xiang Zheng, Hung-Hsi Tan, Chih-Cheng Lai","doi":"10.1016/j.accpm.2025.101566","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute brain injury is a critical health challenge with substantial mortality and morbidity. While anemia is common in these patients and may worsen outcomes, the optimal red blood cell transfusion strategy remains controversial.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We conducted a meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing liberal versus restrictive transfusion strategies in patients with acute brain injury.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Pubmed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases were searched through December 15, 2024, for RCT comparing liberal (hemoglobin threshold 9-10 g/dL) versus restrictive (hemoglobin threshold 7-8 g/dL) transfusion strategies in adults with acute brain injury. The primary outcome was an unfavorable neurological outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six RCTs involving 2,599 patients were included. There was no significant difference in unfavorable neurological outcomes between liberal and restrictive strategies (risk ratio [RR], 0.97; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.83 to 1.14; p = 0.70). Similarly, no differences were observed in overall mortality (RR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.85 to 1.12; p = 0.75), hospital mortality (RR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.79 to 1.31; p = 0.89), or intensive care unit (ICU) mortality (RR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.28 to 1.91; p = 0.53). Although transfusion reaction was non-significantly more frequent with liberal transfusion (RR, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.35 to 3.58; p = 0.84).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients with acute brain injury, a restrictive transfusion strategy was not associated with worse neurological outcomes or higher mortality compared to a liberal strategy.</p><p><strong>Implications for clinical practice: </strong>Maintaining hemoglobin levels above 7-8 g/dL may be effective for patients with acute brain injury, potentially reducing unnecessary transfusions and associated risks. META-ANALYSIS REGISTRATION: registered on PROSPERO under number CRD42025639745).</p>","PeriodicalId":48762,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"101566"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accpm.2025.101566","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Acute brain injury is a critical health challenge with substantial mortality and morbidity. While anemia is common in these patients and may worsen outcomes, the optimal red blood cell transfusion strategy remains controversial.
Objective: We conducted a meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing liberal versus restrictive transfusion strategies in patients with acute brain injury.
Methods: Pubmed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases were searched through December 15, 2024, for RCT comparing liberal (hemoglobin threshold 9-10 g/dL) versus restrictive (hemoglobin threshold 7-8 g/dL) transfusion strategies in adults with acute brain injury. The primary outcome was an unfavorable neurological outcome.
Results: Six RCTs involving 2,599 patients were included. There was no significant difference in unfavorable neurological outcomes between liberal and restrictive strategies (risk ratio [RR], 0.97; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.83 to 1.14; p = 0.70). Similarly, no differences were observed in overall mortality (RR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.85 to 1.12; p = 0.75), hospital mortality (RR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.79 to 1.31; p = 0.89), or intensive care unit (ICU) mortality (RR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.28 to 1.91; p = 0.53). Although transfusion reaction was non-significantly more frequent with liberal transfusion (RR, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.35 to 3.58; p = 0.84).
Conclusions: In patients with acute brain injury, a restrictive transfusion strategy was not associated with worse neurological outcomes or higher mortality compared to a liberal strategy.
Implications for clinical practice: Maintaining hemoglobin levels above 7-8 g/dL may be effective for patients with acute brain injury, potentially reducing unnecessary transfusions and associated risks. META-ANALYSIS REGISTRATION: registered on PROSPERO under number CRD42025639745).
期刊介绍:
Anaesthesia, Critical Care & Pain Medicine (formerly Annales Françaises d''Anesthésie et de Réanimation) publishes in English the highest quality original material, both scientific and clinical, on all aspects of anaesthesia, critical care & pain medicine.