Using Qualitative Research in Community Engagement to Capture and Mitigate Vulnerability Mechanisms in the Face of Infectious Diseases: Insights From a Research-Based Program in Five European Countries During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Mandy Geise, Jacob Osborne, Paul Grohma, Tamara Giles-Vernick, Benedetta Lana, Papa Mamadou Diagne, Zeliha Öcek, Uršula Lipovec Čebron, Neza Vodopivec, Anja Brunec, Jean Paul Baldacchino, Maurice Said, Gisella Orsini, Victoria Sultana, Concetta Vaccaro, Anna-Maria Volkmann, Ruth Kutalek, Michel Dückers
{"title":"Using Qualitative Research in Community Engagement to Capture and Mitigate Vulnerability Mechanisms in the Face of Infectious Diseases: Insights From a Research-Based Program in Five European Countries During the COVID-19 Pandemic.","authors":"Mandy Geise, Jacob Osborne, Paul Grohma, Tamara Giles-Vernick, Benedetta Lana, Papa Mamadou Diagne, Zeliha Öcek, Uršula Lipovec Čebron, Neza Vodopivec, Anja Brunec, Jean Paul Baldacchino, Maurice Said, Gisella Orsini, Victoria Sultana, Concetta Vaccaro, Anna-Maria Volkmann, Ruth Kutalek, Michel Dückers","doi":"10.1177/10497323251346407","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Various frameworks have been proposed for carrying out community engagement (CE) in the context of infectious disease response, but few have done so through a lens of vulnerability and even fewer, if any, have compared cases across countries. This paper reflects on the implementation of a project based on social science research and CE to capture and mitigate vulnerability mechanisms, which was carried out in France, Germany, Italy, Malta, and Slovenia during the COVID-19 pandemic. Using qualitative data collected through interviews, a focus group discussion, and project meetings, we describe how a stepwise CE process was carried out in the context of an international, multi-sectoral project. As such, this paper sheds light on the applicability of the methodology, the strategies followed, and overlapping themes encountered during the CE implementation. In all five countries, researchers created overviews of multiple vulnerability case descriptions situated in communities affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. Several recurring themes played a role in the CE process in the different settings: the challenges of finding, defining, and working with(in) communities; the role and position of researchers \"in action\"; stakeholders and power dynamics; timing of stakeholder involvement; translating qualitative data on vulnerability mechanisms into practical solutions; and sustainability and institutional integration. It is important to consider these themes when planning future initiatives to apply social and behavioral science methods to address and mitigate vulnerabilities in communities confronted with pandemics or other crisis contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":48437,"journal":{"name":"Qualitative Health Research","volume":" ","pages":"10497323251346407"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Qualitative Health Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10497323251346407","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Various frameworks have been proposed for carrying out community engagement (CE) in the context of infectious disease response, but few have done so through a lens of vulnerability and even fewer, if any, have compared cases across countries. This paper reflects on the implementation of a project based on social science research and CE to capture and mitigate vulnerability mechanisms, which was carried out in France, Germany, Italy, Malta, and Slovenia during the COVID-19 pandemic. Using qualitative data collected through interviews, a focus group discussion, and project meetings, we describe how a stepwise CE process was carried out in the context of an international, multi-sectoral project. As such, this paper sheds light on the applicability of the methodology, the strategies followed, and overlapping themes encountered during the CE implementation. In all five countries, researchers created overviews of multiple vulnerability case descriptions situated in communities affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. Several recurring themes played a role in the CE process in the different settings: the challenges of finding, defining, and working with(in) communities; the role and position of researchers "in action"; stakeholders and power dynamics; timing of stakeholder involvement; translating qualitative data on vulnerability mechanisms into practical solutions; and sustainability and institutional integration. It is important to consider these themes when planning future initiatives to apply social and behavioral science methods to address and mitigate vulnerabilities in communities confronted with pandemics or other crisis contexts.

在社区参与中使用定性研究来捕捉和减轻传染病面前的脆弱性机制:来自2019冠状病毒病大流行期间五个欧洲国家基于研究的项目的见解
已经提出了在传染病应对背景下开展社区参与的各种框架,但很少有框架从脆弱性的角度来开展社区参与,比较各国病例的框架甚至更少。本文反映了在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间在法国、德国、意大利、马耳他和斯洛文尼亚开展的一个基于社会科学研究和社会实践的项目的实施情况,该项目旨在捕捉和缓解脆弱性机制。通过访谈、焦点小组讨论和项目会议收集的定性数据,我们描述了如何在国际多部门项目的背景下实施逐步的环境绩效评估过程。因此,本文阐明了方法的适用性、所遵循的策略,以及行政长官在执行过程中遇到的重叠主题。在这五个国家,研究人员对受COVID-19大流行影响的社区的多个脆弱性病例描述进行了概述。几个反复出现的主题在不同环境下的行政教育过程中发挥了作用:发现、定义社区和与社区合作的挑战;研究人员在“行动”中的作用和地位;利益相关者和权力动态;利益相关者参与的时机;将关于脆弱性机制的定性数据转化为实际解决办法;以及可持续性和制度整合。在规划今后采取行动,应用社会和行为科学方法处理和减轻面临流行病或其他危机情况的社区的脆弱性时,必须考虑到这些主题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
6.20%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH is an international, interdisciplinary, refereed journal for the enhancement of health care and to further the development and understanding of qualitative research methods in health care settings. We welcome manuscripts in the following areas: the description and analysis of the illness experience, health and health-seeking behaviors, the experiences of caregivers, the sociocultural organization of health care, health care policy, and related topics. We also seek critical reviews and commentaries addressing conceptual, theoretical, methodological, and ethical issues pertaining to qualitative enquiry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信