Exploring medical student perceptions of a video-modified Peyton's 4-step technique for teaching spinal and neurological examinations.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Medical Education Online Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-16 DOI:10.1080/10872981.2025.2519391
Ramy Sherif, Ewan John, Michael John Haydon McCarthy
{"title":"Exploring medical student perceptions of a video-modified Peyton's 4-step technique for teaching spinal and neurological examinations.","authors":"Ramy Sherif, Ewan John, Michael John Haydon McCarthy","doi":"10.1080/10872981.2025.2519391","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Peyton's 4-step technique is a highly recognized framework for teaching practical procedures. This study introduces a unique video-modified adaptation of the technique for teaching clinical examination and evaluates medical students' perceptions, identifying key areas for enhancement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted with 606 second-year medical students, utilizing an online questionnaire to assess their perceptions of the modified teaching method. Responses were measured using a 5-point Likert scale, with 354 students providing feedback.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Findings revealed significant improvements in student confidence following the video-modified examination session (p-value <0.05). The method was widely accepted by participants, who also provided constructive feedback for refining the teaching approach.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The video-modified Peyton's 4-step technique was perceived by students as a well-structured and engaging method for learning spinal and neurological examinations. Its adaptability to small group settings and integration of video-based instruction were well received and considered beneficial for understanding the procedural steps. While students reported increased confidence, this finding should be interpreted with caution given the cross-sectional design of the study. Incorporating this framework into medical curricula may enhance the delivery of clinical skills training, and future research should explore its impact through longitudinal and comparative studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":47656,"journal":{"name":"Medical Education Online","volume":"30 1","pages":"2519391"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12172078/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Education Online","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2025.2519391","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Peyton's 4-step technique is a highly recognized framework for teaching practical procedures. This study introduces a unique video-modified adaptation of the technique for teaching clinical examination and evaluates medical students' perceptions, identifying key areas for enhancement.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted with 606 second-year medical students, utilizing an online questionnaire to assess their perceptions of the modified teaching method. Responses were measured using a 5-point Likert scale, with 354 students providing feedback.

Results: Findings revealed significant improvements in student confidence following the video-modified examination session (p-value <0.05). The method was widely accepted by participants, who also provided constructive feedback for refining the teaching approach.

Conclusions: The video-modified Peyton's 4-step technique was perceived by students as a well-structured and engaging method for learning spinal and neurological examinations. Its adaptability to small group settings and integration of video-based instruction were well received and considered beneficial for understanding the procedural steps. While students reported increased confidence, this finding should be interpreted with caution given the cross-sectional design of the study. Incorporating this framework into medical curricula may enhance the delivery of clinical skills training, and future research should explore its impact through longitudinal and comparative studies.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

探索医学生对视频修饰的Peyton四步脊柱和神经学检查教学技术的看法。
背景:Peyton的四步法是一个被高度认可的教学实践程序的框架。本研究引入了一种独特的视频修改技术,用于临床检查教学,并评估医学生的认知,确定需要加强的关键领域。方法:对606名二年级医学生进行横断面调查,采用在线问卷调查方式评估他们对改进教学方法的看法。调查采用李克特5分制,共有354名学生提供反馈。结果:研究结果显示,经过视频修饰的检查课程后,学生的自信心有了显著的提高(p值)。结论:视频修饰的佩顿四步技术被学生认为是一种结构良好、引人入胜的学习脊柱和神经学检查的方法。它对小组设置的适应性和基于视频的教学的整合受到好评,并被认为有助于理解程序步骤。虽然学生报告信心增加,但考虑到研究的横截面设计,这一发现应谨慎解释。将这一框架纳入医学课程可能会加强临床技能培训,未来的研究应通过纵向和比较研究来探索其影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical Education Online
Medical Education Online EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.20%
发文量
97
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Medical Education Online is an open access journal of health care education, publishing peer-reviewed research, perspectives, reviews, and early documentation of new ideas and trends. Medical Education Online aims to disseminate information on the education and training of physicians and other health care professionals. Manuscripts may address any aspect of health care education and training, including, but not limited to: -Basic science education -Clinical science education -Residency education -Learning theory -Problem-based learning (PBL) -Curriculum development -Research design and statistics -Measurement and evaluation -Faculty development -Informatics/web
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信