Device Selection Contributes to Operative Time Reduction in Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy.

IF 1.7 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Gynecology and Minimally Invasive Therapy-GMIT Pub Date : 2025-03-15 eCollection Date: 2025-04-01 DOI:10.4103/gmit.gmit_155_23
Kenji Kuroda, Koetsu Hamamoto, Kazuki Kawamura, Ayako Masunaga, Akio Horiguchi, Keiichi Ito
{"title":"Device Selection Contributes to Operative Time Reduction in Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy.","authors":"Kenji Kuroda, Koetsu Hamamoto, Kazuki Kawamura, Ayako Masunaga, Akio Horiguchi, Keiichi Ito","doi":"10.4103/gmit.gmit_155_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The standard laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC) technique involves several suture fixation sites, which can prolong the operative time. This study aimed to investigate the extent to which the operative time could be shortened using devices such as tackers in sites where suture manipulation could be omitted.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The study enrolled 82 patients who underwent LSC at our hospital between May 2016 and May 2022. The median operative time was 3.2 h (1.78-6.5 h). Changes in symptoms before and after surgery were measured using several questionnaires and 60-min pad weight testing among patient groups based on the device used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the preoperative factors, no factors were found to be significantly correlated with the operative time (≥3.2 h or <3.2 h). As intraoperative factors, significant associations were found between the number of tackers used on the posterior vaginal wall, anterior vaginal wall, and cervix (0-3 locations), whether a device was used in mesh retroperitonealization, whether the first needle used to fix the anterior longitudinal ligament was successful, whether adhesion dissection was performed, and the type of sealing device. Among these factors, the use of tackers on the posterior wall, anterior wall, and cervix and the use of a device in mesh retroperitonealization were significantly associated with the operative time.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of easy-to-operate devices appeared to contribute to a shorter operative time in LSC.</p>","PeriodicalId":45272,"journal":{"name":"Gynecology and Minimally Invasive Therapy-GMIT","volume":"14 2","pages":"157-164"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12165672/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gynecology and Minimally Invasive Therapy-GMIT","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/gmit.gmit_155_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The standard laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC) technique involves several suture fixation sites, which can prolong the operative time. This study aimed to investigate the extent to which the operative time could be shortened using devices such as tackers in sites where suture manipulation could be omitted.

Materials and methods: The study enrolled 82 patients who underwent LSC at our hospital between May 2016 and May 2022. The median operative time was 3.2 h (1.78-6.5 h). Changes in symptoms before and after surgery were measured using several questionnaires and 60-min pad weight testing among patient groups based on the device used.

Results: Among the preoperative factors, no factors were found to be significantly correlated with the operative time (≥3.2 h or <3.2 h). As intraoperative factors, significant associations were found between the number of tackers used on the posterior vaginal wall, anterior vaginal wall, and cervix (0-3 locations), whether a device was used in mesh retroperitonealization, whether the first needle used to fix the anterior longitudinal ligament was successful, whether adhesion dissection was performed, and the type of sealing device. Among these factors, the use of tackers on the posterior wall, anterior wall, and cervix and the use of a device in mesh retroperitonealization were significantly associated with the operative time.

Conclusion: The use of easy-to-operate devices appeared to contribute to a shorter operative time in LSC.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

腹腔镜骶骶固定术中器械的选择有助于缩短手术时间。
目的:标准腹腔镜骶colpop固定术(LSC)涉及多个缝合固定部位,延长手术时间。本研究旨在探讨在缝合操作可以省略的部位使用诸如钉钉之类的装置可以缩短手术时间的程度。材料与方法:本研究纳入2016年5月至2022年5月在我院行LSC手术的82例患者。中位手术时间为3.2 h (1.78 ~ 6.5 h)。手术前后的症状变化是根据所使用的设备在患者组中使用几份问卷和60分钟垫重测试来测量的。结果:术前因素中,未发现任何因素与手术时间有显著相关(≥3.2 h)。结论:使用易于操作的器械似乎有助于缩短LSC手术时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
98
审稿时长
52 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信