Theodora T Giannakopoulou, Alexandra K Papadopoulou, Dan Mike Busenhart, Theodore Eliades, Spyridon N Papageorgiou
{"title":"Long-term stability of dental arch widths after extraction and nonextraction orthodontic treatment: A retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Theodora T Giannakopoulou, Alexandra K Papadopoulou, Dan Mike Busenhart, Theodore Eliades, Spyridon N Papageorgiou","doi":"10.1016/j.ejwf.2025.05.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dental arch width is considered biologically determined and is associated with a balanced occlusion. However, it is often actively altered during orthodontic treatment and these modifications are associated with postorthodontic relapse. The purpose of this study was to assess the long-term dental arch width changes among patients treated orthodontically with fixed appliances and assess the effect of dental extractions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Young (<18 years) patients with malocclusion, who had been treated orthodontically with 0.018\"-slot edgewise fixed appliances, were included in this retrospective longitudinal study. The maxillary/mandibular intercanine, interpremolar, and intermolar widths were digitally measured before treatment (T1), at debond (T2), and an average of 7 years post-debond (T3). Data was analyzed statistically at 5% with regression modeling, while a subsample of borderline patients was analyzed to assess the effect of extractions on long-term stability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 104 patients were included (59.6% female; 11.5-year-old at T1), 39.4% (41/104) of which were treated with premolar extractions. All dental arch widths were increased during fixed appliance treatment, with considerable differences between extraction and nonextraction cases (P < 0.05 in all cases). On average 7 years post-debond, nonextraction cases showed significant relapse in intermolar width, while intercanine and interpremolar widths remained stable. After baseline matching of extraction/nonextraction cases, tooth extractions were not associated with post-treatment relapse (P > 0.05). Treatment-related (T1-T2) increases in all three dental arch widths were associated with post-treatment (T2-T3) relapse for both jaws, with 0.20-0.34 mm T2-T3 relapse for each additional 1 mm of width increase during T1-T2.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Modest dental arch width increases during fixed appliance treatment showed satisfactory stability in the long term, while greater archwire expansion was associated with increased relapse.</p>","PeriodicalId":43456,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejwf.2025.05.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Dental arch width is considered biologically determined and is associated with a balanced occlusion. However, it is often actively altered during orthodontic treatment and these modifications are associated with postorthodontic relapse. The purpose of this study was to assess the long-term dental arch width changes among patients treated orthodontically with fixed appliances and assess the effect of dental extractions.
Methods: Young (<18 years) patients with malocclusion, who had been treated orthodontically with 0.018"-slot edgewise fixed appliances, were included in this retrospective longitudinal study. The maxillary/mandibular intercanine, interpremolar, and intermolar widths were digitally measured before treatment (T1), at debond (T2), and an average of 7 years post-debond (T3). Data was analyzed statistically at 5% with regression modeling, while a subsample of borderline patients was analyzed to assess the effect of extractions on long-term stability.
Results: A total of 104 patients were included (59.6% female; 11.5-year-old at T1), 39.4% (41/104) of which were treated with premolar extractions. All dental arch widths were increased during fixed appliance treatment, with considerable differences between extraction and nonextraction cases (P < 0.05 in all cases). On average 7 years post-debond, nonextraction cases showed significant relapse in intermolar width, while intercanine and interpremolar widths remained stable. After baseline matching of extraction/nonextraction cases, tooth extractions were not associated with post-treatment relapse (P > 0.05). Treatment-related (T1-T2) increases in all three dental arch widths were associated with post-treatment (T2-T3) relapse for both jaws, with 0.20-0.34 mm T2-T3 relapse for each additional 1 mm of width increase during T1-T2.
Conclusions: Modest dental arch width increases during fixed appliance treatment showed satisfactory stability in the long term, while greater archwire expansion was associated with increased relapse.