Long-term stability of dental arch widths after extraction and nonextraction orthodontic treatment: A retrospective cohort study.

IF 2.6 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Theodora T Giannakopoulou, Alexandra K Papadopoulou, Dan Mike Busenhart, Theodore Eliades, Spyridon N Papageorgiou
{"title":"Long-term stability of dental arch widths after extraction and nonextraction orthodontic treatment: A retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Theodora T Giannakopoulou, Alexandra K Papadopoulou, Dan Mike Busenhart, Theodore Eliades, Spyridon N Papageorgiou","doi":"10.1016/j.ejwf.2025.05.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dental arch width is considered biologically determined and is associated with a balanced occlusion. However, it is often actively altered during orthodontic treatment and these modifications are associated with postorthodontic relapse. The purpose of this study was to assess the long-term dental arch width changes among patients treated orthodontically with fixed appliances and assess the effect of dental extractions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Young (<18 years) patients with malocclusion, who had been treated orthodontically with 0.018\"-slot edgewise fixed appliances, were included in this retrospective longitudinal study. The maxillary/mandibular intercanine, interpremolar, and intermolar widths were digitally measured before treatment (T1), at debond (T2), and an average of 7 years post-debond (T3). Data was analyzed statistically at 5% with regression modeling, while a subsample of borderline patients was analyzed to assess the effect of extractions on long-term stability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 104 patients were included (59.6% female; 11.5-year-old at T1), 39.4% (41/104) of which were treated with premolar extractions. All dental arch widths were increased during fixed appliance treatment, with considerable differences between extraction and nonextraction cases (P < 0.05 in all cases). On average 7 years post-debond, nonextraction cases showed significant relapse in intermolar width, while intercanine and interpremolar widths remained stable. After baseline matching of extraction/nonextraction cases, tooth extractions were not associated with post-treatment relapse (P > 0.05). Treatment-related (T1-T2) increases in all three dental arch widths were associated with post-treatment (T2-T3) relapse for both jaws, with 0.20-0.34 mm T2-T3 relapse for each additional 1 mm of width increase during T1-T2.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Modest dental arch width increases during fixed appliance treatment showed satisfactory stability in the long term, while greater archwire expansion was associated with increased relapse.</p>","PeriodicalId":43456,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejwf.2025.05.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Dental arch width is considered biologically determined and is associated with a balanced occlusion. However, it is often actively altered during orthodontic treatment and these modifications are associated with postorthodontic relapse. The purpose of this study was to assess the long-term dental arch width changes among patients treated orthodontically with fixed appliances and assess the effect of dental extractions.

Methods: Young (<18 years) patients with malocclusion, who had been treated orthodontically with 0.018"-slot edgewise fixed appliances, were included in this retrospective longitudinal study. The maxillary/mandibular intercanine, interpremolar, and intermolar widths were digitally measured before treatment (T1), at debond (T2), and an average of 7 years post-debond (T3). Data was analyzed statistically at 5% with regression modeling, while a subsample of borderline patients was analyzed to assess the effect of extractions on long-term stability.

Results: A total of 104 patients were included (59.6% female; 11.5-year-old at T1), 39.4% (41/104) of which were treated with premolar extractions. All dental arch widths were increased during fixed appliance treatment, with considerable differences between extraction and nonextraction cases (P < 0.05 in all cases). On average 7 years post-debond, nonextraction cases showed significant relapse in intermolar width, while intercanine and interpremolar widths remained stable. After baseline matching of extraction/nonextraction cases, tooth extractions were not associated with post-treatment relapse (P > 0.05). Treatment-related (T1-T2) increases in all three dental arch widths were associated with post-treatment (T2-T3) relapse for both jaws, with 0.20-0.34 mm T2-T3 relapse for each additional 1 mm of width increase during T1-T2.

Conclusions: Modest dental arch width increases during fixed appliance treatment showed satisfactory stability in the long term, while greater archwire expansion was associated with increased relapse.

拔牙和非拔牙正畸治疗后牙弓宽度的长期稳定性:一项回顾性队列研究。
背景:牙弓宽度被认为是由生物学决定的,与平衡咬合有关。然而,在正畸治疗过程中,它经常被主动改变,这些改变与正畸后复发有关。本研究的目的是评估固定矫治器正畸患者长期牙弓宽度的变化,并评估拔牙的效果。结果:共纳入104例患者,其中女性59.6%;11.5岁(T1), 39.4%(41/104)采用前磨牙拔牙治疗。固定矫治组牙弓宽度均增加,拔牙组与未拔牙组差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。脱落后平均7年,未拔牙的病例磨牙间宽度明显复发,而犬牙间和释磨牙宽度保持稳定。拔牙与未拔牙病例基线匹配后,拔牙与治疗后复发无相关性(P < 0.05)。所有三个牙弓宽度的治疗相关(T1-T2)增加与治疗后(T2-T3)双颌复发相关,在T1-T2期间,宽度每增加1 mm, T2-T3复发0.20-0.34 mm。结论:在固定矫治器治疗中,适当增加牙弓宽度可以获得满意的长期稳定性,而较大的弓丝扩张与复发增加有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists
Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.80%
发文量
34
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信