Validation of the Polish Self and Interpersonal Functioning Scale (SIFS-PL) in community and clinical samples.

IF 1.1 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Current Issues in Personality Psychology Pub Date : 2025-01-09 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.5114/cipp/194231
Emilia Soroko, Jan Cieciuch, Dominick Gamache
{"title":"Validation of the Polish Self and Interpersonal Functioning Scale (SIFS-PL) in community and clinical samples.","authors":"Emilia Soroko, Jan Cieciuch, Dominick Gamache","doi":"10.5114/cipp/194231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of this study was to examine the psychometric properties of the Polish version of the Self and Interpersonal Functioning Scale (SIFS-PL). The scale is designed to assess Criterion A of the DSM-5 Alternative Model of Personality Disorders (AMPD) - the four core elements of personality pathology (Identity, Self-direction, Empathy, and Intimacy) from the Level of Personality Functioning (LPF) for personality disorders (PDs).</p><p><strong>Participants and procedure: </strong>Adult participants from 6 community and clinical samples (total <i>N</i> = 394; 83.2% female; age: <i>M</i> = 30.9, <i>SD</i> = 9.6) completed the SIFS-PL. A clinical subsample of 50 patients diagnosed with personality disorders additionally completed the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID5).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Confirmatory factor analysis supported a bifactor four-factor model. All items had significant loadings on both the four specific elements and an overarching general personality pathology factor. The internal consistency ranged from acceptable to good for subscales and excellent for the global scale. In terms of criterion validity, results from the clinical subgroup were consistent with previous research on the SIFS. The SIFS-PL scales effectively discriminated between community sample participants and those suffering from depression, as well as an ambulatory clinical group with personality disorders.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings underscore the robust psychometric properties of the Polish version of the SIFS, rendering it a promising tool for both screening and extensive research on personality disorders within contemporary dimensional models such as the AMPD and ICD-11. Its application in clinical settings can also be advocated. However, general scores and subscale scores might serve distinct purposes, warranting further investigation into their predictive validity.</p>","PeriodicalId":43067,"journal":{"name":"Current Issues in Personality Psychology","volume":"13 2","pages":"138-147"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12163587/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Issues in Personality Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/cipp/194231","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to examine the psychometric properties of the Polish version of the Self and Interpersonal Functioning Scale (SIFS-PL). The scale is designed to assess Criterion A of the DSM-5 Alternative Model of Personality Disorders (AMPD) - the four core elements of personality pathology (Identity, Self-direction, Empathy, and Intimacy) from the Level of Personality Functioning (LPF) for personality disorders (PDs).

Participants and procedure: Adult participants from 6 community and clinical samples (total N = 394; 83.2% female; age: M = 30.9, SD = 9.6) completed the SIFS-PL. A clinical subsample of 50 patients diagnosed with personality disorders additionally completed the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID5).

Results: Confirmatory factor analysis supported a bifactor four-factor model. All items had significant loadings on both the four specific elements and an overarching general personality pathology factor. The internal consistency ranged from acceptable to good for subscales and excellent for the global scale. In terms of criterion validity, results from the clinical subgroup were consistent with previous research on the SIFS. The SIFS-PL scales effectively discriminated between community sample participants and those suffering from depression, as well as an ambulatory clinical group with personality disorders.

Conclusions: Our findings underscore the robust psychometric properties of the Polish version of the SIFS, rendering it a promising tool for both screening and extensive research on personality disorders within contemporary dimensional models such as the AMPD and ICD-11. Its application in clinical settings can also be advocated. However, general scores and subscale scores might serve distinct purposes, warranting further investigation into their predictive validity.

Abstract Image

波兰自我与人际功能量表(SIFS-PL)在社区和临床样本中的验证。
背景:本研究的目的是检验波兰版自我与人际功能量表(SIFS-PL)的心理测量特性。该量表旨在从人格障碍(pd)的人格功能水平(LPF)评估DSM-5人格障碍替代模型(AMPD)的标准A -人格病理学的四个核心要素(身份,自我导向,共情和亲密关系)。参与者和程序:来自6个社区和临床样本的成人参与者(总N = 394;83.2%的女性;年龄:M = 30.9, SD = 9.6)完成sfs - pl。50名诊断为人格障碍的患者的临床亚样本另外完成了DSM-5 (PID5)的人格量表。结果:验证性因子分析支持双因素四因素模型。所有项目在四个特定因素和一个总体人格病理因素上都有显著的负荷。内部一致性范围从可接受到良好的子尺度和优秀的全球尺度。在标准效度方面,临床亚组的结果与先前关于SIFS的研究一致。sfs - pl量表有效地区分了社区样本参与者和抑郁症患者以及有人格障碍的门诊临床组。结论:我们的研究结果强调了波兰版SIFS的强大心理测量特性,使其成为在当代维度模型(如AMPD和ICD-11)中筛选和广泛研究人格障碍的有前途的工具。其在临床的应用也值得提倡。然而,一般分数和子量表分数可能有不同的目的,需要进一步研究它们的预测有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信